IMPLEMENTING FOREST TENURE REFORMS: PERSPECTIVES FROM INDONESIA’S FORESTRY AGENCIES

T. Herawati, E. Mwangi, N. Liswanti
{"title":"IMPLEMENTING FOREST TENURE REFORMS: PERSPECTIVES FROM INDONESIA’S FORESTRY AGENCIES","authors":"T. Herawati, E. Mwangi, N. Liswanti","doi":"10.20886/ijfr.2019.6.2.117-132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest Tenure Reform implementation involves diverse actors with multiple roles and interests, including government officials. Few studies have attempted to systematically document the conditions facing government agency implementers in their efforts to implement forest tenure reform. This study attempts to identifies factors that enhance or constrain reform implementation from the perspective of individual implementers at national and sub-national levels in Indonesia. The study was conducted through analysing data that resulted from bureaucrat’s interview who purposively selected at Central and Local Government. Most interviewees indicate that forest tenure reforms have three interrelated objectives: to conserve forests and restore degraded forests, to improve community livelihoods and ensure benefits are equitably distributed; and to secure the rights of local, forest-adjacent or forest-dwelling communities. Reform implementation has been effective or somewhat effective in protecting community rights to access, use, manage and benefit from forests. Close to half of the respondents indicated that their activities gave special consideration to low income groups but few paid special attentions to women and women’s rights. Main constraints to implementation are inadequate budgets and insufficient manpower to execute tenure-related activities. Divergent priorities between national and sub-national/local levels and changes in government that redistribute personnel are additional factors that hinder reform implementation. Overall, respondents agree that reforms are only partially implemented due to technical and institutions constraints, which in turn influence the extent to which collaboration/coordination among actors can be achieved and the extent to which community tenure needs such as conflict management and resolution can be addressed.","PeriodicalId":13482,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2019.6.2.117-132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Forest Tenure Reform implementation involves diverse actors with multiple roles and interests, including government officials. Few studies have attempted to systematically document the conditions facing government agency implementers in their efforts to implement forest tenure reform. This study attempts to identifies factors that enhance or constrain reform implementation from the perspective of individual implementers at national and sub-national levels in Indonesia. The study was conducted through analysing data that resulted from bureaucrat’s interview who purposively selected at Central and Local Government. Most interviewees indicate that forest tenure reforms have three interrelated objectives: to conserve forests and restore degraded forests, to improve community livelihoods and ensure benefits are equitably distributed; and to secure the rights of local, forest-adjacent or forest-dwelling communities. Reform implementation has been effective or somewhat effective in protecting community rights to access, use, manage and benefit from forests. Close to half of the respondents indicated that their activities gave special consideration to low income groups but few paid special attentions to women and women’s rights. Main constraints to implementation are inadequate budgets and insufficient manpower to execute tenure-related activities. Divergent priorities between national and sub-national/local levels and changes in government that redistribute personnel are additional factors that hinder reform implementation. Overall, respondents agree that reforms are only partially implemented due to technical and institutions constraints, which in turn influence the extent to which collaboration/coordination among actors can be achieved and the extent to which community tenure needs such as conflict management and resolution can be addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施森林保有权改革:印尼林业机构的视角
森林保有权改革的实施涉及具有多种角色和利益的不同行为者,包括政府官员。很少有研究试图系统地记录政府机构实施者在实施森林保有权改革方面所面临的条件。本研究试图从印度尼西亚国家和地方各级的个别实施者的角度来确定促进或限制改革实施的因素。这项研究是通过分析官员面试的数据进行的,这些官员被有意选入中央和地方政府。大多数受访者表示,森林保有权改革有三个相互关联的目标:保护森林和恢复退化森林,改善社区生计,确保利益公平分配;以及保障当地、毗邻森林或居住在森林中的社区的权利。在保护社区获得、使用、管理和受益于森林的权利方面,改革的实施是有效的或在一定程度上是有效的。近一半的受访者表示,他们的活动特别考虑到了低收入群体,但很少有人特别关注妇女和妇女权利。执行方面的主要制约因素是预算不足和执行与任期相关活动的人力不足。国家和次国家/地方各级的优先事项不同,以及重新分配人员的政府改革是阻碍改革实施的额外因素。总体而言,答复者一致认为,由于技术和体制方面的限制,改革只得到了部分实施,这反过来又影响了行为者之间的合作/协调的实现程度,以及冲突管理和解决等社区保有权需求的解决程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COLCHICINE AND ORYZALIN ON POLYPLOIDY INDUCTION IN TEAK (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) IN VITRO FOOD SELF-SUFFICIENCY AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: A CASE STUDY IN PEATLANDS OF SOUTH SUMATRA CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF Melaleuca leucadendron Linn. LEAF ESSENTIAL OILS QUALITY UNDER DIFFERENT COLLECTING TIME IN KPH YOGYAKARTA, GUNUNGKIDUL, INDONESIA BIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION OF BAMBOO PAPER BY TWO WHITE-ROT FUNGI SPECIES EFFECT OF PULP SLUDGE COMPOST VS. MANURE FERTILIZER APPLICATION TO THE GROWTH OF GERONGGANG (Cratoxylum arborescens) SEEDLINGS IN PEAT SOIL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1