Psychosocial correlates of well-being among people who engage in online health-seeking behaviour

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY South African Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-08 DOI:10.1177/00812463231186335
R. Roomaney, M. Popovac
{"title":"Psychosocial correlates of well-being among people who engage in online health-seeking behaviour","authors":"R. Roomaney, M. Popovac","doi":"10.1177/00812463231186335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined the extent to which neuroticism, health anxiety, social anxiety, and social support predicted well-being in a sample of online users engaging in health-seeking behaviour. We used a cross-sectional online survey to recruit participants who engaged in online health-seeking behaviour. The study included 350 participants who were recruited online using social media platforms such as Reddit and Twitter. A multiple regression was conducted to examine the relationships between neuroticism, health anxiety, social anxiety, social support, and well-being. Participants completed a battery of measures on Survey Monkey consisting of a demographic questionnaire, International Personality Item Pool Big Five Markers, Leibowitz Social Anxiety scale, Short Health Anxiety Inventory, World Health Organisation Five Well-Being Index, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. We found significant negative correlations between the indicated psychological variables and well-being, indicating that higher levels of neuroticism, social anxiety, and health anxiety were related to lower levels of well-being. We also found significant, positive correlations between the social support variables and well-being, indicating that more social support was correlated with better well-being. The results of the multiple regression demonstrate that neuroticism, health anxiety, family support, and friend support were significant predictors of well-being.","PeriodicalId":47237,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00812463231186335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the extent to which neuroticism, health anxiety, social anxiety, and social support predicted well-being in a sample of online users engaging in health-seeking behaviour. We used a cross-sectional online survey to recruit participants who engaged in online health-seeking behaviour. The study included 350 participants who were recruited online using social media platforms such as Reddit and Twitter. A multiple regression was conducted to examine the relationships between neuroticism, health anxiety, social anxiety, social support, and well-being. Participants completed a battery of measures on Survey Monkey consisting of a demographic questionnaire, International Personality Item Pool Big Five Markers, Leibowitz Social Anxiety scale, Short Health Anxiety Inventory, World Health Organisation Five Well-Being Index, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. We found significant negative correlations between the indicated psychological variables and well-being, indicating that higher levels of neuroticism, social anxiety, and health anxiety were related to lower levels of well-being. We also found significant, positive correlations between the social support variables and well-being, indicating that more social support was correlated with better well-being. The results of the multiple regression demonstrate that neuroticism, health anxiety, family support, and friend support were significant predictors of well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与在线健康寻求行为的人幸福感的心理社会相关性
我们研究了神经质、健康焦虑、社交焦虑和社会支持在多大程度上预测了参与健康寻求行为的在线用户的幸福感。我们使用了一项横断面的在线调查来招募参与在线健康寻求行为的参与者。这项研究包括350名使用Reddit和Twitter等社交媒体平台在线招募的参与者。采用多元回归检验神经质、健康焦虑、社交焦虑、社会支持和幸福感之间的关系。参与者在Survey Monkey上完成了一系列测量,包括人口统计问卷、国际个性项目库大五标记、Leibowitz社交焦虑量表、短期健康焦虑量表,世界卫生组织五项幸福指数和感知社会支持多维量表。我们发现,所示的心理变量与幸福感之间存在显著的负相关,表明神经质、社交焦虑和健康焦虑水平越高,幸福感水平越低。我们还发现,社会支持变量与幸福感之间存在显著的正相关关系,表明更多的社会支持与更好的幸福感相关。多元回归的结果表明,神经质、健康焦虑、家庭支持和朋友支持是幸福感的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Psychology
South African Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Psychology publishes contributions in English from all fields of psychology. While the emphasis is on empirical research, the Journal also accepts theoretical and methodological papers, review articles, short communications, reviews and letters containing fair commentary. Priority is given to articles which are relevant to Africa and which address psychological issues of social change and development.
期刊最新文献
Exploring primary mental health care nurses’ perceptions of the post-treatment needs of women admitted for psychiatric treatment ‘Crushed all over again’: the professional experiences of early career counselling psychologists in South Africa South African fathers’ experiences with healthcare providers during their partners’ medically high-risk pregnancy and childbirth Bodies, bruises, and blisters, and the struggle for/of the feminine/muscular body: the ways in which women CrossFitters transgress gendered boundaries The well-being correlates of religious commitment amongst South African and Kenyan students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1