Discrimination between Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase–Inhibiting Herbicide-Resistant and Herbicide-Susceptible Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with Spectral Reflectance

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Weed Science Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1017/wsc.2023.25
E. Jones, R. Austin, J. Dunne, R. León, W. Everman
{"title":"Discrimination between Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase–Inhibiting Herbicide-Resistant and Herbicide-Susceptible Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with Spectral Reflectance","authors":"E. Jones, R. Austin, J. Dunne, R. León, W. Everman","doi":"10.1017/wsc.2023.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current assays to confirm herbicide resistance can be time- and labor-intensive (dose–response) or require a skill set/technical equipment (genetic sequencing). Stakeholders could benefit from a rapid assay to confirm herbicide-resistant weeds to ensure sustainable crop production. Because protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicides rapidly interfere with chlorophyll production/integrity; we propose a new, rapid assay utilizing spectral reflectance to confirm resistance. Leaf disks were excised from two PPO-inhibiting herbicide-resistant (target-site [TSR] and non–target site [NTSR]) and herbicide-susceptible redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) populations and placed into a 24-well plate containing different concentrations (0 to 10 mM) of fomesafen for 48 h. A multispectral sensor captured images from the red (668 nm), green (560 nm), blue (475 nm), and red edge (717 nm) wavebands after a 48-h incubation period. The green leaf index (GLI) was utilized to determine spectral reflectance ratios of the treated leaf disks. Clear differences of spectral reflectance were observed in the red edge waveband for all populations treated with the 10 mM concentration in the dose–response assays. Differences of spectral reflectance were observed for the NTSR population compared with the TSR and susceptible populations treated with the 10 mM concentration in the green waveband and the GLI in the dose–response assay. Leaf disks from the aforementioned A. retroflexus populations and two additional susceptible populations were subjected to a similar assay with the discriminating concentration (10 mM). Spectral reflectance was different between the PPO-inhibiting herbicide-resistant and herbicide-susceptible populations in the red, blue, and green wavebands. Spectral reflectance was not distinctive between the populations in the red edge waveband and the GLI. The results provide a basis for rapidly (∼48 h) detecting PPO-inhibiting herbicide-resistant A. retroflexus via spectral reflectance. Discrimination between TSR and NTSR populations was possible only in the dose–response assay, but the assay still has utility in distinguishing herbicide-resistant plants from herbicide-susceptible plants.","PeriodicalId":23688,"journal":{"name":"Weed Science","volume":"71 1","pages":"198 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2023.25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The current assays to confirm herbicide resistance can be time- and labor-intensive (dose–response) or require a skill set/technical equipment (genetic sequencing). Stakeholders could benefit from a rapid assay to confirm herbicide-resistant weeds to ensure sustainable crop production. Because protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicides rapidly interfere with chlorophyll production/integrity; we propose a new, rapid assay utilizing spectral reflectance to confirm resistance. Leaf disks were excised from two PPO-inhibiting herbicide-resistant (target-site [TSR] and non–target site [NTSR]) and herbicide-susceptible redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) populations and placed into a 24-well plate containing different concentrations (0 to 10 mM) of fomesafen for 48 h. A multispectral sensor captured images from the red (668 nm), green (560 nm), blue (475 nm), and red edge (717 nm) wavebands after a 48-h incubation period. The green leaf index (GLI) was utilized to determine spectral reflectance ratios of the treated leaf disks. Clear differences of spectral reflectance were observed in the red edge waveband for all populations treated with the 10 mM concentration in the dose–response assays. Differences of spectral reflectance were observed for the NTSR population compared with the TSR and susceptible populations treated with the 10 mM concentration in the green waveband and the GLI in the dose–response assay. Leaf disks from the aforementioned A. retroflexus populations and two additional susceptible populations were subjected to a similar assay with the discriminating concentration (10 mM). Spectral reflectance was different between the PPO-inhibiting herbicide-resistant and herbicide-susceptible populations in the red, blue, and green wavebands. Spectral reflectance was not distinctive between the populations in the red edge waveband and the GLI. The results provide a basis for rapidly (∼48 h) detecting PPO-inhibiting herbicide-resistant A. retroflexus via spectral reflectance. Discrimination between TSR and NTSR populations was possible only in the dose–response assay, but the assay still has utility in distinguishing herbicide-resistant plants from herbicide-susceptible plants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用光谱反射法鉴别原卟啉原氧化酶对除草剂的抗性和对除草剂的敏感性
摘要目前确认除草剂抗性的测定可能是时间和劳动密集型的(剂量-反应),或者需要一套技能/技术设备(基因测序)。利益相关者可以从快速检测中受益,以确认抗除草剂杂草,从而确保可持续的作物生产。因为抑制原卟啉原氧化酶(PPO)的除草剂会迅速干扰叶绿素的产生/完整性;我们提出了一种新的快速检测方法,利用光谱反射率来确认耐药性。从两个抑制PPO的除草剂抗性(靶位点[TSR]和非靶位点[NTSR])和除草剂敏感的复根猪草(Amaranthus retroflexus L.)种群中切下叶盘,并将其放入含有不同浓度(0至10mM)的氟美沙芬的24孔板中48小时。多光谱传感器捕获了红色(668 nm)、绿色(560 nm)、蓝色(475 nm),以及48小时培养期后的红边(717nm)波段。绿叶指数(GLI)用于确定处理过的叶盘的光谱反射率。在剂量-反应测定中,在用10mM浓度处理的所有群体的红边波段中观察到光谱反射率的明显差异。与绿色波段中用10mM浓度处理的TSR和易感人群相比,NTSR人群的光谱反射率存在差异,剂量-反应分析中用GLI处理。对来自上述反曲A.retroflexus群体和另外两个易感群体的叶盘进行具有鉴别浓度(10mM)的类似测定。在红色、蓝色和绿色波段,PPO抑制除草剂抗性种群和除草剂敏感种群的光谱反射率不同。在红边波段和GLI中,种群之间的光谱反射率并不明显。该结果为通过光谱反射快速(~48小时)检测PPO抑制除草剂的反曲弯孢提供了基础。TSR和NTSR种群之间的区分仅在剂量-反应分析中可行,但该分析在区分抗除草剂植物和易受除草剂影响的植物方面仍然有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Science
Weed Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science in agricultural systems. Topics for Weed Science include: - the biology and ecology of weeds in agricultural, forestry, aquatic, turf, recreational, rights-of-way and other settings, genetics of weeds - herbicide resistance, chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and molecular action of herbicides and plant growth regulators used to manage undesirable vegetation - ecology of cropping and other agricultural systems as they relate to weed management - biological and ecological aspects of weed control tools including biological agents, and herbicide resistant crops - effect of weed management on soil, air and water.
期刊最新文献
Adaptations in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) flowering time, Part 1: Individual-based modeling of a polygenic trait Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and unresolved Amaranthus spp. from Brazil resistant to glyphosate exhibit the EPSPS TAP-IVS substitution A Systematic Review of Chemical Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogea) in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities Breeding allelopathy in cereal rye for weed suppression A hydrothermal model to predict Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) seedling emergence in the dryland of the Pacific Northwest (USA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1