Rotational Dynamics of EVA Style Analysis: Implications for Traders and Investors

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Investing Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.3905/joi.2022.1.244
A. Chakraborty, J. Grant, E. Trahan, B. Varma
{"title":"Rotational Dynamics of EVA Style Analysis: Implications for Traders and Investors","authors":"A. Chakraborty, J. Grant, E. Trahan, B. Varma","doi":"10.3905/joi.2022.1.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We extend prior work on economic value added (EVA) style analysis in the context of dynamic changes in EVA style. We find that rotations of EVA style provide traders and investors with opportunistic returns. For value-creating growth companies, the status quo strategy outperformed the consolidated annual average return of companies that moved out of Quadrant II (QII) to other EVA styles by 7.45%. For value-destroying growth companies, the status quo position underperformed the consolidated average return of companies that moved out of QIII to other EVA styles by 11.24%. For almost every year from 2000–2020, the status quo strategy for value-creating growth companies outperformed the consolidated annual returns from moving out of QII to other EVA styles. For most every year over the 21-year reporting period, the status quo strategy for value-destroying growth companies underperformed the consolidated returns from moving out of QIII. Future research on the dynamics of EVA style points to opportunities to build out trading systems across multiple starting points.","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":"32 1","pages":"70 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2022.1.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We extend prior work on economic value added (EVA) style analysis in the context of dynamic changes in EVA style. We find that rotations of EVA style provide traders and investors with opportunistic returns. For value-creating growth companies, the status quo strategy outperformed the consolidated annual average return of companies that moved out of Quadrant II (QII) to other EVA styles by 7.45%. For value-destroying growth companies, the status quo position underperformed the consolidated average return of companies that moved out of QIII to other EVA styles by 11.24%. For almost every year from 2000–2020, the status quo strategy for value-creating growth companies outperformed the consolidated annual returns from moving out of QII to other EVA styles. For most every year over the 21-year reporting period, the status quo strategy for value-destroying growth companies underperformed the consolidated returns from moving out of QIII. Future research on the dynamics of EVA style points to opportunities to build out trading systems across multiple starting points.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVA风格分析的循环动力学:对交易员和投资者的启示
我们在EVA风格动态变化的背景下扩展了先前关于经济增加值(EVA)风格分析的工作。我们发现,EVA风格的轮动为交易者和投资者提供了机会回报。对于创造价值的成长型公司,现状策略的综合年平均回报率超过了从象限II(QII)转移到其他EVA风格的公司7.45%。对于破坏价值的成长性公司,从QII转移到其他EVA风格的公司,现状状况的综合平均回报率低11.24%。从2000年到2020年,几乎每年,创造价值的成长型公司的现状战略都优于从QII迁移到其他EVA类型的综合年度回报率。在21年的报告期内,大多数年份,破坏价值的成长型公司的现状策略都不如从QII中撤出的综合回报。未来对EVA风格动态的研究指出了在多个起点建立交易系统的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
A New Global Portfolio Weighting Strategy Based on Cointegration Methods “I Have Never Seen a Bad Backtest”: Modeling Reality in Quantitative Investing Predicting Market Risk Premiums with Historical Patterns How Many Securities Should an Active Manager hold? What Makes the Dollar Cost Averaging Strategy So Popular Today? A Critical Review of the Benefits and Risks of a Controversial Investment Scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1