Economic and environmental comparison of conventional and conservation agriculture in South African wheat production

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agrekon Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1080/03031853.2023.2169481
W. Mulimbi, L. Nalley, J. Strauss, Kristiina Ala-Kokko
{"title":"Economic and environmental comparison of conventional and conservation agriculture in South African wheat production","authors":"W. Mulimbi, L. Nalley, J. Strauss, Kristiina Ala-Kokko","doi":"10.1080/03031853.2023.2169481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Global wheat yields must increase to meet current and rising global demand despite the increasing threats to production resulting from climate change. One climate change adaptation strategy in wheat production in the Western Cape of South Africa is conservation agriculture (CA). Using a data set of 1,043 plot-level wheat observations collected at Langgewens and Tygerhoek research farms from 2002 to 2020, this study conducts a stepwise Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to estimate the environmental and economic impacts of switching from conventional wheat production to CA’s zero tillage (zero-till) and no-tillage (no-till) systems. The results indicate that CA is more profitable and has a higher environmental efficiency, than conventional tillage wheat production. In Langgewens, zero-till and no-till are respectively 113% and 55% more efficient than conventional tillage when comparing the environmental impact of producing one kg of wheat. Findings also suggest that, compared to 100% conventional tillage wheat production, the adoption of CA systems has led to reductions in environmental damage valued between R269.2 and R402.5 million in the Western Cape.","PeriodicalId":55541,"journal":{"name":"Agrekon","volume":"62 1","pages":"133 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrekon","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2023.2169481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Global wheat yields must increase to meet current and rising global demand despite the increasing threats to production resulting from climate change. One climate change adaptation strategy in wheat production in the Western Cape of South Africa is conservation agriculture (CA). Using a data set of 1,043 plot-level wheat observations collected at Langgewens and Tygerhoek research farms from 2002 to 2020, this study conducts a stepwise Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to estimate the environmental and economic impacts of switching from conventional wheat production to CA’s zero tillage (zero-till) and no-tillage (no-till) systems. The results indicate that CA is more profitable and has a higher environmental efficiency, than conventional tillage wheat production. In Langgewens, zero-till and no-till are respectively 113% and 55% more efficient than conventional tillage when comparing the environmental impact of producing one kg of wheat. Findings also suggest that, compared to 100% conventional tillage wheat production, the adoption of CA systems has led to reductions in environmental damage valued between R269.2 and R402.5 million in the Western Cape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非小麦生产中传统农业和保护性农业的经济和环境比较
摘要:尽管气候变化对生产的威胁越来越大,但全球小麦产量必须提高,以满足当前和不断增长的全球需求。南非西开普省小麦生产中的一项气候变化适应战略是保护性农业。本研究使用2002年至2020年在Langgewens和Tygerhoek研究农场收集的1043个地块级小麦观测数据集,进行了逐步生命周期评估(LCA),以评估从传统小麦生产转向CA的免耕(免耕)和免耕(免耕)系统对环境和经济的影响。结果表明,与传统的小麦耕作生产相比,CA更有利可图,环境效率更高。在Langgewens,当比较生产一公斤小麦的环境影响时,免耕和免耕的效率分别比传统耕作高113%和55%。研究结果还表明,与100%的传统耕作小麦生产相比,CA系统的采用减少了西开普省6.92亿至4.025亿兰特的环境破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrekon
Agrekon AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Agrekon publishes scholarly articles that contribute to the existing literature in the domain of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics as it applies to Southern Africa. The editors of Agrekon therefore invite contributions in this context that provide new insights, either through the problems they address, the methods they employ or the theoretical and practical insights gained from the results. The quarterly journal serves as the official publication of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA) and is published by Taylor & Francis.
期刊最新文献
Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study Modelling the exiting of South African producers from commercial agricultural production – an agent-based model The Covid pandemic, cultivation and livelihoods in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Agricultural productivity, land use intensification and rural household welfare: evidence from Ethiopia Is persistent “loadshedding” pulling the plug on agriculture in the Western Cape, South Africa?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1