Prospective Evaluation of Factors Associated with Arteriovenous Fistula Primary Failure and Complications in Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center-Study

Ismail Al-Shameri, Gamal KhudaBux, Abudar Al-Ganadi
{"title":"Prospective Evaluation of Factors Associated with Arteriovenous Fistula Primary Failure and Complications in Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center-Study","authors":"Ismail Al-Shameri, Gamal KhudaBux, Abudar Al-Ganadi","doi":"10.33425/2639-8486.1103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of this study was to analysis factors affecting arteriovenous fistula patency, to improve access outcome. Methods& Patients: Patients (n=290) were enrolled in our prospective observational study. Demographic, clinical, and operative variables were compared between those with and without NAVF function loss. In addition, we evaluated the distribution and complication of NAVF and its association with different factors. All statistical analyses were performed with the use of appropriate SPSS software package, version 24.0. Results: We found 96.5% (n=280) of patients had NAVFs, among them 67.9% (190/280) of patients had upper NAVFs, followed by lower NAVFs 32.1% 90/280), while 3.4% (10/290) of patients had depended on a cuff catheter. The most frequent complication post NAVF creation was thrombosis (11.4%), followed by noninfectious fluid collections (9.3%), infection (6.4%), Limp edema (4.3%), Aneurysmal degeneration (3.2%), arterial steal syndrome (2.5%) and venous hypertension (1.8%). History of dialysis catheter used AVF location and absent intraoperative thrill were independently associated with loss of NAVF primary patency. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of steal syndrome in patients who had diabetes mellitus (P value= 0.021) and in patients who had age >65 years (P value 0.002), while female gender was not (P value= 0.122). History of catheter used (P = 0.02), previous AVF procedure (P= 0.01), and present of non-infection fluid (P = 0.00) were found significantly increase the infection rate of NAVF. Conclusions: Identifying risk factors affecting AVF patency is crucial. Early and timely treating complications post AVF is essential for proper management and maturation.","PeriodicalId":72522,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology & vascular research (Wilmington, Del.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology & vascular research (Wilmington, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-8486.1103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to analysis factors affecting arteriovenous fistula patency, to improve access outcome. Methods& Patients: Patients (n=290) were enrolled in our prospective observational study. Demographic, clinical, and operative variables were compared between those with and without NAVF function loss. In addition, we evaluated the distribution and complication of NAVF and its association with different factors. All statistical analyses were performed with the use of appropriate SPSS software package, version 24.0. Results: We found 96.5% (n=280) of patients had NAVFs, among them 67.9% (190/280) of patients had upper NAVFs, followed by lower NAVFs 32.1% 90/280), while 3.4% (10/290) of patients had depended on a cuff catheter. The most frequent complication post NAVF creation was thrombosis (11.4%), followed by noninfectious fluid collections (9.3%), infection (6.4%), Limp edema (4.3%), Aneurysmal degeneration (3.2%), arterial steal syndrome (2.5%) and venous hypertension (1.8%). History of dialysis catheter used AVF location and absent intraoperative thrill were independently associated with loss of NAVF primary patency. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of steal syndrome in patients who had diabetes mellitus (P value= 0.021) and in patients who had age >65 years (P value 0.002), while female gender was not (P value= 0.122). History of catheter used (P = 0.02), previous AVF procedure (P= 0.01), and present of non-infection fluid (P = 0.00) were found significantly increase the infection rate of NAVF. Conclusions: Identifying risk factors affecting AVF patency is crucial. Early and timely treating complications post AVF is essential for proper management and maturation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液透析患者动静脉瘘原发性失败及并发症相关因素的前瞻性评价:一项单中心研究
目的:本研究的目的是分析影响动静脉瘘通畅性的因素,以提高入路效果。方法和患者:患者(n=290)被纳入我们的前瞻性观察性研究。比较有和无NAVF功能丧失患者的人口学、临床和手术变量。此外,我们还评估了NAVF的分布和并发症及其与不同因素的关系。所有统计分析均使用适当的SPSS软件包24.0版进行。结果:我们发现96.5%(n=280)的患者患有NAVF,其中67.9%(190/280)的患者具有上NAVF,其次是下NAVF 32.1%(90/280),而3.4%(10/290)的患者依赖于袖带导管。NAVF形成后最常见的并发症是血栓形成(11.4%),其次是非感染性积液(9.3%)、感染(6.4%)、Limp水肿(4.3%)、动脉瘤变性(3.2%),动脉窃血综合征(2.5%)和静脉高压(1.8%)。透析导管使用AVF定位的历史和术中无刺激与NAVF原发性通畅性丧失独立相关。糖尿病患者(P=0.021)和年龄>65岁的患者(0.002)偷窃综合征的数量有统计学意义的增加,而女性则没有(0.122),非感染液的存在(P=0.00)显著增加NAVF的感染率。结论:识别影响AVF通畅性的危险因素至关重要。早期及时治疗AVF后的并发症对于正确的管理和成熟至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stroke Subtypes, Risk Factors and Treatment Outcomes at A Tertiary Hospital Situated in Rural Southwestern Nigeria: A Five- Year Restrospective Observational Study Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Components among EarlyAge onset Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Bangladesh Aortic Dissection Involving a Right Retroesophagian Subclaviary Artery (LUSORIA) Associated with a Bi-Carotidian Trunk: About a Case at the National University Hospital Center of Fann (Sénégal) Use of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain to predict Reverse Left Ventricular Remodeling after MitraClip Repair Can Early Diagnosis - Treatment of A Hemodynamically Significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus Reduce the Incidence of Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Extreme Low Birth Weight Infants?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1