Evolution of beryllium safety standards over the last 70 years and challenges ahead

Munish Kumar, A. Srivastava
{"title":"Evolution of beryllium safety standards over the last 70 years and challenges ahead","authors":"Munish Kumar, A. Srivastava","doi":"10.4103/rpe.rpe_6_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beryllium (Be), its alloys, and ceramics are widely used in high-tech applications such as electronics, space, atomic energy, and other day-to-day items of use. Initially, Be-based phosphors such as ZnBeSiO4 were being used in the lamp industry during the 1930s onward but were soon abandoned due to lung-related diseases and deaths of workers in the phosphor industry which was attributed to the highly toxic nature of Be. Typical effects associated with Be inhalation are chronic and acute Be diseases (CBD and ABD) and the main target organ being affected is the lung although effects on other human body organs are also well documented. Such diseases were observed not only in occupational workers handling Be but also in the members of the public residing in the neighborhood of Be manufacturing and processing facilities, especially in the USA. The CBD in occupational workers may depend on many factors such as individual's sensitivity to Be, amount of Be exposure, nature of Be compound, and types of Be operations and processes being performed. All this led to safety concerns about the toxicity of Be and recommendations regarding Be air concentration in the workplace and public environment were issued by the Department of Energy, USA in 1949 as occupational exposure limit (OEL)/threshold limit values (TLVs) which were 2.0 μg/m3 and 0.01 μg/m3 for occupational Be workers and public environment, respectively. It is worth to mention that these recommendations were adopted by various countries and organizations either as it is or with small changes. Later, different organizations recommended changes in the value of TLV for occupational workplaces, but such changes were never adopted as they were lacking sound epidemiological basis. The OEL/TLV of 2.0 μg/m3 continued for nearly 70 years until Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 2017 reduced the Be air concentration (BeAir-Conc) limit for occupational workers to 0.20 μg/m3 as the value of 2.00 μg/m3 was inadequate to protect occupational workers from CBD. This is a major change in the Be-related safety standards recommended recently and is/being adopted by many countries. The present article provides details about the evolution of Be safety standards over the last 70 years, the notion behind the recent revision of Be permissible exposure limit (PEL) value from 2.0 μg/m3 to 0.20 μg/m3 by OSHA and the associated safety challenges ahead. The information from literature about Be safety and related safety standards adopted in India is also given. The article also provides details about TLVs for BeAir-Conc being followed in various countries in the world and various challenges for the implementation of a revised PEL value of 0.20 μg/m3 as suggested by OSHA i.e., reduction in PEL value by a factor of 10 or recommendation of revised TLV of 0.05 μg/m3 by American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists as compared to the previous value of 2.0 μg/m3. In view of different notations and limits for BeAir-Conc recommended by various agencies and limited information about Be safety-related details, all relevant information regarding Be safety along with the evolution of Be safety standards over the last 70 years is included in the present article. This is an important issue for the safety of individual's at occupational workplaces as well as for environmental safety and its compilation was highly needed for providing comprehensive information on Be safety from the inception of standards to till today.","PeriodicalId":32488,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Protection and Environment","volume":"45 1","pages":"107 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Protection and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rpe.rpe_6_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beryllium (Be), its alloys, and ceramics are widely used in high-tech applications such as electronics, space, atomic energy, and other day-to-day items of use. Initially, Be-based phosphors such as ZnBeSiO4 were being used in the lamp industry during the 1930s onward but were soon abandoned due to lung-related diseases and deaths of workers in the phosphor industry which was attributed to the highly toxic nature of Be. Typical effects associated with Be inhalation are chronic and acute Be diseases (CBD and ABD) and the main target organ being affected is the lung although effects on other human body organs are also well documented. Such diseases were observed not only in occupational workers handling Be but also in the members of the public residing in the neighborhood of Be manufacturing and processing facilities, especially in the USA. The CBD in occupational workers may depend on many factors such as individual's sensitivity to Be, amount of Be exposure, nature of Be compound, and types of Be operations and processes being performed. All this led to safety concerns about the toxicity of Be and recommendations regarding Be air concentration in the workplace and public environment were issued by the Department of Energy, USA in 1949 as occupational exposure limit (OEL)/threshold limit values (TLVs) which were 2.0 μg/m3 and 0.01 μg/m3 for occupational Be workers and public environment, respectively. It is worth to mention that these recommendations were adopted by various countries and organizations either as it is or with small changes. Later, different organizations recommended changes in the value of TLV for occupational workplaces, but such changes were never adopted as they were lacking sound epidemiological basis. The OEL/TLV of 2.0 μg/m3 continued for nearly 70 years until Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 2017 reduced the Be air concentration (BeAir-Conc) limit for occupational workers to 0.20 μg/m3 as the value of 2.00 μg/m3 was inadequate to protect occupational workers from CBD. This is a major change in the Be-related safety standards recommended recently and is/being adopted by many countries. The present article provides details about the evolution of Be safety standards over the last 70 years, the notion behind the recent revision of Be permissible exposure limit (PEL) value from 2.0 μg/m3 to 0.20 μg/m3 by OSHA and the associated safety challenges ahead. The information from literature about Be safety and related safety standards adopted in India is also given. The article also provides details about TLVs for BeAir-Conc being followed in various countries in the world and various challenges for the implementation of a revised PEL value of 0.20 μg/m3 as suggested by OSHA i.e., reduction in PEL value by a factor of 10 or recommendation of revised TLV of 0.05 μg/m3 by American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists as compared to the previous value of 2.0 μg/m3. In view of different notations and limits for BeAir-Conc recommended by various agencies and limited information about Be safety-related details, all relevant information regarding Be safety along with the evolution of Be safety standards over the last 70 years is included in the present article. This is an important issue for the safety of individual's at occupational workplaces as well as for environmental safety and its compilation was highly needed for providing comprehensive information on Be safety from the inception of standards to till today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铍安全标准在过去70年中的演变和未来的挑战
铍(Be)及其合金和陶瓷广泛用于高科技应用,如电子、太空、原子能和其他日常用品。最初,Be基磷光体,如ZnBeSiO4,在20世纪30年代以后被用于灯具行业,但由于Be的剧毒性质,磷光体行业工人的肺部相关疾病和死亡,很快被放弃。与吸入Be相关的典型影响是慢性和急性Be疾病(CBD和ABD),受影响的主要靶器官是肺,尽管对其他人体器官的影响也有充分的记录。这种疾病不仅在处理Be的职业工人中观察到,而且在Be制造和加工设施附近的公众中也观察到,尤其是在美国。职业工人的CBD可能取决于许多因素,如个人对Be的敏感性、Be暴露量、Be化合物的性质,以及正在执行的Be操作和过程的类型。所有这些都导致了对Be毒性的安全担忧,美国能源部于1949年发布了关于工作场所和公共环境中Be空气浓度的建议,作为职业暴露限值(OEL)/阈值限值(TLV),对职业Be工人和公共环境分别为2.0μg/m3和0.01μg/m3。值得一提的是,这些建议是由各个国家和组织通过的,要么是按现状通过,要么是稍作修改。后来,不同的组织建议改变职业工作场所的TLV值,但这些改变从未被采纳,因为它们缺乏健全的流行病学基础。2.0μg/m3的OEL/TLV持续了近70年,直到职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)在2017年将职业工人的Be空气浓度(BeAir-Conc)限值降至0.20μg/m3,因为2.00μg/m3的值不足以保护职业工人免受CBD的影响。这是最近推荐的Be相关安全标准的一个重大变化,许多国家正在采用。本文详细介绍了过去70年来Be安全标准的演变,OSHA最近将Be允许暴露限值(PEL)从2.0μg/m3修订为0.20μg/m3的概念,以及未来的相关安全挑战。还提供了有关Be安全和印度采用的相关安全标准的文献信息。文章还详细介绍了世界各国对BeAir Conc的TLV的遵守情况,以及OSHA建议的0.20μ。,PEL值降低了10倍,或者美国政府工业卫生学家会议建议将TLV修正为0.05微克/立方米,而之前的值为2.0微克/立方米。鉴于各机构推荐的BeAir Conc的不同符号和限制,以及Be安全相关细节的有限信息,本文包含了过去70年Be安全标准的演变过程中有关Be安全的所有相关信息。这对个人在职业工作场所的安全以及环境安全都是一个重要问题,从标准制定到今天,它的汇编对于提供关于Be安全的全面信息是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Theme 8. Emergency preparedness and response Theme 2. Radiation Safety and Protection in Nuclear Facilities Theme 1. Foundation Topics on Radiation Protection Philosophy and Risk Estimates Theme 7. Existing Exposures Theme 5. Nuclear instrumentation and system development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1