Self-care practices for common acute conditions in the Philippines: a scoping review

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Governance Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1108/ijhg-01-2023-0008
Arianna Maever Loreche, V. Pepito, M. Dayrit
{"title":"Self-care practices for common acute conditions in the Philippines: a scoping review","authors":"Arianna Maever Loreche, V. Pepito, M. Dayrit","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-01-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis review aimed to identify and map published studies on self-care practices to manage common acute health conditions in the Philippines.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a scoping review in PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ProQuest Central, Journal Storage (JSTOR) and the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development – Health Research and Development Information Network (HERDIN). The authors included all studies on self-care practices to manage common acute conditions, namely low back pain, allergic rhinitis, general acute pain, cough, cold, diarrhea, constipation and stress, published up to 2021 in the Philippines. Information on the article type, aim of the study, study design and setting, population characteristics and size, and self-practices employed for the conditions were extracted and synthesized.FindingsThe authors identified various self-care practices for acute conditions among the general population and indigenous peoples in the Philippines from 26 studies included in the review: the use of medicines with and without a prescription, appropriate and inappropriate antibiotic use, use of medicinal plants and other traditional and alternative therapies and products, recreational activities and healthy habits and behaviors, and self-management or seeking care from traditional healers (albularyo or manggagamot) or health professionals. A number of considerations influenced their decision on how to manage symptoms, including perceived severity of the condition, availability and perceived effectiveness of treatment, cost, and advice from trusted sources of health information.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors searched five major databases and a local research database, but some studies may still have been missed in the review. The review also excluded intervention studies on the outcomes of self-care, which limits the authors' ability to make conclusions on the effectiveness of the different modalities of self-care.Social implicationsFilipinos engage in a variety of “safe” (or evidence-informed) and “unsafe” (or harmful) self-care practices. While the term “self-care” is not routinely used by the general population and health providers, it is widely enculturated and practiced in the Philippines. Self-care benefits individuals and the health system, but there are also practices that increase risk of adverse outcomes and death including inappropriate antibiotic use, prescription sharing and reuse, and delays in seeking adequate treatment from a health professional. To leverage on self-care in advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) goals, the authors recommend a national strategy that provides guidance on how to practice responsible self-care, further research on the effectiveness and safety of alternative medicine and other priority areas, and better integration of self-care in the formal education and health systems. The authors also propose that the research agenda on self-care include acute health conditions, given their impact and burden on health and the economy.Originality/valueThis is the first published review of self-care practices for managing common acute health conditions, which captured practices of various groups and populations including indigenous peoples.","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-01-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis review aimed to identify and map published studies on self-care practices to manage common acute health conditions in the Philippines.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a scoping review in PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ProQuest Central, Journal Storage (JSTOR) and the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development – Health Research and Development Information Network (HERDIN). The authors included all studies on self-care practices to manage common acute conditions, namely low back pain, allergic rhinitis, general acute pain, cough, cold, diarrhea, constipation and stress, published up to 2021 in the Philippines. Information on the article type, aim of the study, study design and setting, population characteristics and size, and self-practices employed for the conditions were extracted and synthesized.FindingsThe authors identified various self-care practices for acute conditions among the general population and indigenous peoples in the Philippines from 26 studies included in the review: the use of medicines with and without a prescription, appropriate and inappropriate antibiotic use, use of medicinal plants and other traditional and alternative therapies and products, recreational activities and healthy habits and behaviors, and self-management or seeking care from traditional healers (albularyo or manggagamot) or health professionals. A number of considerations influenced their decision on how to manage symptoms, including perceived severity of the condition, availability and perceived effectiveness of treatment, cost, and advice from trusted sources of health information.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors searched five major databases and a local research database, but some studies may still have been missed in the review. The review also excluded intervention studies on the outcomes of self-care, which limits the authors' ability to make conclusions on the effectiveness of the different modalities of self-care.Social implicationsFilipinos engage in a variety of “safe” (or evidence-informed) and “unsafe” (or harmful) self-care practices. While the term “self-care” is not routinely used by the general population and health providers, it is widely enculturated and practiced in the Philippines. Self-care benefits individuals and the health system, but there are also practices that increase risk of adverse outcomes and death including inappropriate antibiotic use, prescription sharing and reuse, and delays in seeking adequate treatment from a health professional. To leverage on self-care in advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) goals, the authors recommend a national strategy that provides guidance on how to practice responsible self-care, further research on the effectiveness and safety of alternative medicine and other priority areas, and better integration of self-care in the formal education and health systems. The authors also propose that the research agenda on self-care include acute health conditions, given their impact and burden on health and the economy.Originality/valueThis is the first published review of self-care practices for managing common acute health conditions, which captured practices of various groups and populations including indigenous peoples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾常见急性疾病的自我护理实践:范围界定综述
目的本综述旨在确定和绘制已发表的关于自我护理实践的研究,以管理菲律宾常见的急性健康状况。设计/方法/方法作者在PubMed、Scopus、护理和联合健康文献累积指数(CINAHL)、ProQuest Central、,期刊存储(JSTOR)和菲律宾卫生研究与发展委员会-卫生研究与开发信息网络(HERDIN)。作者纳入了截至2021年在菲律宾发表的所有关于管理常见急性疾病的自我护理实践的研究,即腰痛、过敏性鼻炎、一般急性疼痛、咳嗽、感冒、腹泻、便秘和压力。提取并综合了有关文章类型、研究目的、研究设计和设置、人群特征和规模以及在该条件下采用的自我实践的信息。研究结果作者从综述中的26项研究中确定了菲律宾普通人群和土著人民对急性疾病的各种自我护理做法:有处方和无处方药物的使用、适当和不适当的抗生素使用、药用植物和其他传统和替代疗法及产品的使用、,娱乐活动和健康习惯和行为,以及自我管理或寻求传统治疗师(albularyo或manggagamot)或健康专业人员的护理。许多考虑因素影响了他们关于如何管理症状的决定,包括感知到的病情严重程度、治疗的可用性和感知到的有效性、成本以及来自可靠健康信息来源的建议。研究局限性/含义作者搜索了五个主要数据库和一个当地研究数据库,但在综述中可能仍然遗漏了一些研究。该综述还排除了对自我护理结果的干预研究,这限制了作者对不同自我护理模式的有效性得出结论的能力。菲律宾人从事各种“安全”(或证据知情)和“不安全”(或者有害)的自我护理实践。虽然“自我护理”一词并不是普通人群和卫生服务提供者经常使用的,但它在菲律宾被广泛接受和实践。自我护理有利于个人和卫生系统,但也有一些做法会增加不良后果和死亡的风险,包括不适当的抗生素使用、处方共享和重复使用,以及延迟向卫生专业人员寻求充分治疗。为了利用自我保健来推进全民健康覆盖(UHC)目标,作者建议制定一项国家战略,指导如何实施负责任的自我保健,进一步研究替代医学和其他优先领域的有效性和安全性,并将自我保健更好地融入正规教育和卫生系统。作者还提出,鉴于急性健康状况对健康和经济的影响和负担,自我保健的研究议程包括急性健康状况。独创性/价值这是首次发表的关于管理常见急性健康状况的自我护理实践的综述,其中涵盖了包括土著人民在内的各种群体和人口的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
期刊最新文献
The response of regional general hospitals in Indonesia to COVID-19 Editorial: Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency IJHG review 28.4 Management of gallstone disease and chronic liver diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Ukraine: an ecological study Transforming food systems: a case of Eat Right India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1