Moving Beyond Promise: A Response to The Choice Theory of Contracts

Q3 Social Sciences Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jrls/jly038
P. Saprai
{"title":"Moving Beyond Promise: A Response to The Choice Theory of Contracts","authors":"P. Saprai","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jly038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is impossible to overestimate the impact and importance that the publication in 1981 of Charles Fried’s Contract as Promise has had on the field of philosophically inclined contract theory. The book was and still is considered seminal. At the time, the very idea of a contract law grounded on liberal premises and as an independent legal category was under sustained attack from the Critical Legal Studies (‘CLS’) movement, which viewed contract law and indeed law generally as an instrument of social control. Like any tool, its value depended on its usefulness for achieving the end to which it was put. Aside from that, it was dispensable.","PeriodicalId":36820,"journal":{"name":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jrls/jly038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jly038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is impossible to overestimate the impact and importance that the publication in 1981 of Charles Fried’s Contract as Promise has had on the field of philosophically inclined contract theory. The book was and still is considered seminal. At the time, the very idea of a contract law grounded on liberal premises and as an independent legal category was under sustained attack from the Critical Legal Studies (‘CLS’) movement, which viewed contract law and indeed law generally as an instrument of social control. Like any tool, its value depended on its usefulness for achieving the end to which it was put. Aside from that, it was dispensable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越承诺:对契约选择理论的回应
查尔斯·弗里德1981年出版的《契约即承诺》对哲学倾向的契约理论产生了怎样的影响和重要性都不为过。这本书过去和现在都被认为是开创性的。当时,基于自由前提并作为一个独立法律类别的合同法的理念正受到批判法律研究运动的持续攻击,该运动将合同法乃至法律普遍视为社会控制的工具。与任何工具一样,它的价值取决于它对实现其目的的有用性。除此之外,它是可有可无的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People Unstable Personalized Law Personalizing Personalized Law: Discussion of “Personalized Law” Personalized Law and the Depersonalization of the Person Personalized Behavioral Regulation Is Here: What Lessons for “Personalized Law”?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1