Crossing the curtain: British activists and the echoes of soviet dissent in contemporary Russian human rights activism

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cambridge Review of International Affairs Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1080/09557571.2022.2106820
M. Hurst
{"title":"Crossing the curtain: British activists and the echoes of soviet dissent in contemporary Russian human rights activism","authors":"M. Hurst","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2022.2106820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The efforts of the Soviet authorities to suppress political opposition are widely known, utilising psychiatry to ‘treat’ political dissidents and the widespread, state-endorsed persecution of religious believers. These human rights violations often became flashpoints in the Cold War, shaping international relations and offering a moral weapon through which the Soviet Union could be attacked. Given the tightly controlled nature of information in the Soviet bloc, how did academics, journalists, and politicians in Britain know about this persecution? How could information obtained on the position of political dissidents be trusted in the West, and how did it end up influencing those in positions of power? Given recent events in Russia, understanding the historic response to human rights violations in the Cold War offers the space to reflect on contemporary concerns. This article argues that parallels can be drawn between human rights concerns in the Soviet and post-Soviet world, and that understanding historic case studies can offer insight into the efforts of contemporary activists. Alongside this, it argues that the efforts of activists in Britain need to be considered in order to understand the way in which human rights issues in Russia are understood, placing these concerns into an international context.","PeriodicalId":51580,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","volume":"36 1","pages":"513 - 531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2106820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The efforts of the Soviet authorities to suppress political opposition are widely known, utilising psychiatry to ‘treat’ political dissidents and the widespread, state-endorsed persecution of religious believers. These human rights violations often became flashpoints in the Cold War, shaping international relations and offering a moral weapon through which the Soviet Union could be attacked. Given the tightly controlled nature of information in the Soviet bloc, how did academics, journalists, and politicians in Britain know about this persecution? How could information obtained on the position of political dissidents be trusted in the West, and how did it end up influencing those in positions of power? Given recent events in Russia, understanding the historic response to human rights violations in the Cold War offers the space to reflect on contemporary concerns. This article argues that parallels can be drawn between human rights concerns in the Soviet and post-Soviet world, and that understanding historic case studies can offer insight into the efforts of contemporary activists. Alongside this, it argues that the efforts of activists in Britain need to be considered in order to understand the way in which human rights issues in Russia are understood, placing these concerns into an international context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谢幕:英国活动家与苏联异议在当代俄罗斯人权活动中的回响
摘要苏联当局镇压政治反对派的努力广为人知,利用精神病学“治疗”政治异见人士,以及国家支持的对宗教信徒的广泛迫害。这些侵犯人权的行为经常成为冷战的爆发点,塑造了国际关系,并提供了一种道德武器,通过这种武器可以攻击苏联。鉴于苏联集团对信息的严格控制,英国的学者、记者和政治家是如何知道这种迫害的?在西方,获得的关于持不同政见者立场的信息怎么可能得到信任,它最终是如何影响当权者的?鉴于俄罗斯最近发生的事件,了解对冷战中侵犯人权行为的历史性回应,为反思当代关切提供了空间。本文认为,苏联和后苏联世界的人权问题可以相提并论,了解历史案例研究可以深入了解当代活动家的努力。除此之外,它还认为,为了理解人们对俄罗斯人权问题的理解方式,需要考虑英国活动人士的努力,并将这些担忧置于国际背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Ascending Orders: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International InstitutionsRohan Mukherjee, Ascending Orders: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International Institutions , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, ISBN: 9781009195874 (ebook), 9781009186810 (hbk), 324 pp. Farahnaz Ispahani, Politics of hate: Religious majoritarianism in South Asia Farahnaz Ispahani, Politics of hate: Religious majoritarianism in South Asia , Harper Collins, Gurugram, Haryana, India, 2023, ISBN-13: 978-9356293557, ISBN-10: 9356293554 (pbk), 336 pp Letter from the editors, CRIA Volume 37, Issue 1 Everyday nuclear histories and futures in the Middle East, 1945–1948 The ‘situatedness’ of security in postcolonial spaces: Examining the historical and spatial trajectories of localised practices in Tunisia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1