Severely mobility-disabled people assess the quality of their lives.

R. Stensman
{"title":"Severely mobility-disabled people assess the quality of their lives.","authors":"R. Stensman","doi":"10.2340/1650197785178799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirty-six severely mobility-disabled subjects aged 24-52 years using a wheelchair and in need of daily assistance and 36 non-handicapped, matched control-subjects were interviewed. They were asked to rank 30 different abilities involving physical and mental functions, interpersonal and social relationships, and to rate their overall quality of life (QOL) on a 0-10 point scale. Among the severely mobility-disabled subjects the mean value of self-reported QOL was 8.0, which differs only slightly from 8.3 among the controls. The mean QOL among the disabled showed no significant difference regarding congenital/acquired and progressive/permanent disability. The 'abilities' ranked 1-9 were not directly related to mobility and corresponded among the disabled and non-handicapped. The functions lacked by the severely mobility-disabled persons were rated as less important by the disabled. The undiminished QOL is probably a result of personal adjustment, compensation by medical rehabilitation and society, as well as positive features of the disability.","PeriodicalId":76523,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine","volume":"17 2 1","pages":"87-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"145","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197785178799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145

Abstract

Thirty-six severely mobility-disabled subjects aged 24-52 years using a wheelchair and in need of daily assistance and 36 non-handicapped, matched control-subjects were interviewed. They were asked to rank 30 different abilities involving physical and mental functions, interpersonal and social relationships, and to rate their overall quality of life (QOL) on a 0-10 point scale. Among the severely mobility-disabled subjects the mean value of self-reported QOL was 8.0, which differs only slightly from 8.3 among the controls. The mean QOL among the disabled showed no significant difference regarding congenital/acquired and progressive/permanent disability. The 'abilities' ranked 1-9 were not directly related to mobility and corresponded among the disabled and non-handicapped. The functions lacked by the severely mobility-disabled persons were rated as less important by the disabled. The undiminished QOL is probably a result of personal adjustment, compensation by medical rehabilitation and society, as well as positive features of the disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动不便的残疾人评估他们的生活质量。
访谈了36名年龄在24-52岁、使用轮椅并需要日常帮助的重度行动障碍受试者和36名非残疾、匹配的对照受试者。他们被要求对30种不同的能力进行排名,包括身体和心理功能、人际关系和社会关系,并对他们的整体生活质量(QOL)进行0-10分的评分。在严重行动障碍受试者中,自我报告的生活质量平均值为8.0,与对照组的8.3仅略有不同。残疾人的平均生活质量在先天性/后天性和进行性/永久性残疾方面没有显著差异。排名1-9的“能力”与行动能力没有直接关系,在残疾人和非残疾人中相对应。行动不便的残疾人所缺乏的功能被残疾人认为不那么重要。生活质量的下降可能是个人适应、医疗康复和社会补偿以及残疾的积极特征的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. III. Medical service--work consequence. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. A controlled study. Growth hormone and periarticular new bone formation--a causal relationship? A preliminary communication. The etiology and conservative treatment of humeral epicondylitis. Effects of comprehensive rehabilitation on weight reduction in myocardial infarction patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1