Management of Charitable Program Expense Ratios in the Charity Sector

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Australian Accounting Review Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI:10.1111/auar.12346
Dominic Cyr, Suzanne Landry, Anne Fortin
{"title":"Management of Charitable Program Expense Ratios in the Charity Sector","authors":"Dominic Cyr,&nbsp;Suzanne Landry,&nbsp;Anne Fortin","doi":"10.1111/auar.12346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine factors likely to influence charity managers’ propensity to manage their charitable program expense ratios. To this end, we survey 202 Canadian charities. First, we ask managers whether they think a high charitable program expense ratio is important. The results suggest that managers are less concerned with charitable program expense ratios when there are no regulatory restrictions for this figure, but they are more (less) inclined to post a high charitable program expense ratio when the charity depends on private donations (relies on government grants). We also find a positive relationship between education level and managers’ perception of the importance of having a high charitable program expense ratio. Second, for managers who believe having a high charitable program expense ratio is important, we use a logit model to analyse their propensity to manage the ratio upward. We show that improving the management team's reputation, avoiding losing the organisation's charitable status and retaining or obtaining government grants propel charity managers to alter the ratio. However, managers with more experience in a management position in charities and those with higher levels of education are less likely to engage in this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"106-123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/auar.12346","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We examine factors likely to influence charity managers’ propensity to manage their charitable program expense ratios. To this end, we survey 202 Canadian charities. First, we ask managers whether they think a high charitable program expense ratio is important. The results suggest that managers are less concerned with charitable program expense ratios when there are no regulatory restrictions for this figure, but they are more (less) inclined to post a high charitable program expense ratio when the charity depends on private donations (relies on government grants). We also find a positive relationship between education level and managers’ perception of the importance of having a high charitable program expense ratio. Second, for managers who believe having a high charitable program expense ratio is important, we use a logit model to analyse their propensity to manage the ratio upward. We show that improving the management team's reputation, avoiding losing the organisation's charitable status and retaining or obtaining government grants propel charity managers to alter the ratio. However, managers with more experience in a management position in charities and those with higher levels of education are less likely to engage in this practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慈善领域慈善项目费用比例的管理
我们考察了可能影响慈善经理人管理其慈善项目费用比率倾向的因素。为此,我们调查了202家加拿大慈善机构。首先,我们询问管理者,他们是否认为较高的慈善项目费用比率很重要。结果表明,在没有监管限制的情况下,管理者对慈善项目费用比率的关注程度较低,但当慈善项目依赖于私人捐赠(依赖于政府拨款)时,管理者更(不)倾向于公布较高的慈善项目费用比率。我们还发现教育水平与管理者对高慈善项目费用比率重要性的认知之间存在正相关关系。其次,对于那些认为拥有较高的慈善项目费用比率很重要的管理者,我们使用logit模型来分析他们向上管理比率的倾向。我们发现,提高管理团队的声誉,避免失去组织的慈善地位,保留或获得政府资助,推动慈善管理者改变比例。然而,在慈善机构的管理职位上有更多经验的经理和受过高等教育的经理不太可能参与这种做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Boundaries of Accounting The Shifting and Permeable Boundaries of Auditing: Evidence from Early Australian Examination Papers CEO Benevolence and Corporate Social Performance Integrated Reporting Impact on Core Organisational Practices: A Practice-Based Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1