The modularity of the motor system

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophical Explorations Pub Date : 2021-07-28 DOI:10.1080/13869795.2021.1957204
M. Mylopoulos
{"title":"The modularity of the motor system","authors":"M. Mylopoulos","doi":"10.1080/13869795.2021.1957204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, I make a case for the modularity of the motor system. I start where many do in discussions of modularity, by considering the extent to which the motor system is cognitively penetrable, i.e. the extent to which its processing and outputs are causally influenced, in a semantically coherent way, by states of central cognition. I present some empirical findings from a range of sensorimotor adaptation studies that strongly suggest that there are limits to such influence under certain conditions. These results cry out for an explanation. In the remainder of the paper, I provide one: The motor system is cognitively penetrable, but nonetheless modular along broadly Fodorian lines, insofar as it is informationally encapsulated. This means that its access is limited to its own proprietary database in computing its function from input to output, which does not include the information stored in central cognition. I then offer a model of action control, from distal intention to action outcomes, that further helps to illustrate this picture and can accommodate the target empirical findings.","PeriodicalId":46014,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Explorations","volume":"24 1","pages":"376 - 393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13869795.2021.1957204","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2021.1957204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I make a case for the modularity of the motor system. I start where many do in discussions of modularity, by considering the extent to which the motor system is cognitively penetrable, i.e. the extent to which its processing and outputs are causally influenced, in a semantically coherent way, by states of central cognition. I present some empirical findings from a range of sensorimotor adaptation studies that strongly suggest that there are limits to such influence under certain conditions. These results cry out for an explanation. In the remainder of the paper, I provide one: The motor system is cognitively penetrable, but nonetheless modular along broadly Fodorian lines, insofar as it is informationally encapsulated. This means that its access is limited to its own proprietary database in computing its function from input to output, which does not include the information stored in central cognition. I then offer a model of action control, from distal intention to action outcomes, that further helps to illustrate this picture and can accommodate the target empirical findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电机系统的模块化
摘要在本文中,我为电机系统的模块化做了一个例子。我从许多人讨论模块化的地方开始,通过考虑运动系统在认知上可穿透的程度,即它的处理和输出在多大程度上以语义连贯的方式受到中心认知状态的因果影响。我提出了一系列感觉运动适应研究的一些经验发现,这些研究强烈表明,在某些条件下,这种影响是有限的。这些结果迫切需要解释。在论文的其余部分,我提供了一个:运动系统在认知上是可穿透的,但在信息封装的范围内,它仍然是广义的Fodorian线的模块化系统。这意味着,在计算其从输入到输出的功能时,其访问权限仅限于其自己的专有数据库,其中不包括存储在中央认知中的信息。然后,我提供了一个行动控制模型,从远端意图到行动结果,这进一步有助于说明这一情况,并可以适应目标实证结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
See what I didn’t do there? Mental illness, exemption & moral exclusion: the role of interpretative generosity Let’s not get ahead of ourselves: we have no idea if moral reasoning causes moral progress Bringing transparency to the de se debates Life and meaning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1