Combinance in the Evolution of Language: Overcoming Limitations

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Cognitive Semantics Pub Date : 2018-08-02 DOI:10.1163/23526416-00402001
L. Talmy
{"title":"Combinance in the Evolution of Language: Overcoming Limitations","authors":"L. Talmy","doi":"10.1163/23526416-00402001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For early pre-language hominins, the vocal-auditory channel of communication as then organized may have been unable to accommodate any enhancement in the transmission of conceptual content due to three limitations: comparatively low degrees of parameter diversity, iconicity, and fidelity. We propose that these limitations were overcome by an evolutionary development that enabled an advance from the fixed holophrastic calls of earlier species to the open-ended spoken language of our own species. What developed was a “combinant” form of organization.Such combinance is a system in which smaller units combine to form larger units. At its smallest scale, this process yields a “clave”. In a clave, generally, units from an inventory at a lower tier combine to form the units of an inventory at the next higher tier in accord with a particular set of constraints. In turn, such claves function as the smaller units that combine to form a larger unit, a concatenation, where the higher tier of one clave serves as the lower tier of the next. The longest such concatenation in language consists of six successive claves. Phonetic features combine to form phonemes under the constraints of feature assembly; phonemes combine to form morphemes under the constraints of phonotactics; morphemes combine to form complex words under the constraints of morphology; morphemes and complex words combine to form expressions under the constraints of syntax; expressions combine to form a single speaker’s “monolog” under the constraints of discourse rules; and such monologs combine to form an exchange between speakers under the constraints of turn-taking.Our analysis characterizes communication at its most general and contrasts different channels of communication. In particular, the vocal-auditory channel of spoken language is extensively contrasted with the somatic-visual channel of signed language, whose classifier system largely lacks the three limitations of the former. To show this difference, the limitations are analyzed in detail (e.g., iconicity is shown to be based on six properties: prorepresentation, covariation, proportionality, proportional directness, cogranularity, and codomainality). In accord with this difference, the signed classifier system demonstrates the cognitive feasibility of communicating advanced conceptual content with little combinance, but the vocal-auditory channel is seen to have needed the incorporation of combinance for spoken language to evolve.","PeriodicalId":52227,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semantics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23526416-00402001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00402001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For early pre-language hominins, the vocal-auditory channel of communication as then organized may have been unable to accommodate any enhancement in the transmission of conceptual content due to three limitations: comparatively low degrees of parameter diversity, iconicity, and fidelity. We propose that these limitations were overcome by an evolutionary development that enabled an advance from the fixed holophrastic calls of earlier species to the open-ended spoken language of our own species. What developed was a “combinant” form of organization.Such combinance is a system in which smaller units combine to form larger units. At its smallest scale, this process yields a “clave”. In a clave, generally, units from an inventory at a lower tier combine to form the units of an inventory at the next higher tier in accord with a particular set of constraints. In turn, such claves function as the smaller units that combine to form a larger unit, a concatenation, where the higher tier of one clave serves as the lower tier of the next. The longest such concatenation in language consists of six successive claves. Phonetic features combine to form phonemes under the constraints of feature assembly; phonemes combine to form morphemes under the constraints of phonotactics; morphemes combine to form complex words under the constraints of morphology; morphemes and complex words combine to form expressions under the constraints of syntax; expressions combine to form a single speaker’s “monolog” under the constraints of discourse rules; and such monologs combine to form an exchange between speakers under the constraints of turn-taking.Our analysis characterizes communication at its most general and contrasts different channels of communication. In particular, the vocal-auditory channel of spoken language is extensively contrasted with the somatic-visual channel of signed language, whose classifier system largely lacks the three limitations of the former. To show this difference, the limitations are analyzed in detail (e.g., iconicity is shown to be based on six properties: prorepresentation, covariation, proportionality, proportional directness, cogranularity, and codomainality). In accord with this difference, the signed classifier system demonstrates the cognitive feasibility of communicating advanced conceptual content with little combinance, but the vocal-auditory channel is seen to have needed the incorporation of combinance for spoken language to evolve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言进化中的组合:克服局限
对于早期的前语言人类来说,由于三个限制:参数多样性、象似性和保真度相对较低,当时组织的沟通的声道可能无法适应概念内容传递的任何增强。我们提出,这些限制是通过进化的发展而克服的,进化的发展使我们能够从早期物种的固定全语短语呼叫发展到我们自己物种的开放式口语。发展起来的是一种“组合”的组织形式。这种组合是一种较小单元组合形成较大单元的系统。在最小的规模下,这个过程会产生一个“棒”。在克拉维中,通常情况下,根据一组特定的约束条件,较低级别库存的单位合并形成下一个较高级别库存的单元。反过来,这种棒的作用是较小的单元,它们结合在一起形成一个较大的单元,即串联,其中一个棒的较高层充当下一个的较低层。语言中最长的这种串联由六个连续的clave组成。语音特征在特征组装的约束下组合形成音素;音素在表音策略的制约下结合形成语素;语素在形态学的制约下组合形成复杂的词;语素和复杂词在句法的制约下结合形成表达;在话语规则的约束下,表达方式结合在一起形成了一个说话人的“独白”;这种单语组在轮流发言的约束下结合起来形成了说话者之间的交流。我们的分析以最普遍的沟通为特征,并对比了不同的沟通渠道。尤其是口语的声听觉通道与手语的体视觉通道有着广泛的对比,后者的分类器系统在很大程度上缺乏前者的三个局限性。为了显示这种差异,详细分析了其局限性(例如,象似性基于六个性质:按比例表示、协变、比例性、比例直接性、共域性和共域性)。根据这种差异,签名分类器系统证明了用很少的组合来传达高级概念内容的认知可行性,但人们认为,声道需要结合组合才能进化口语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semantics
Cognitive Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Overhauling Collostructional Analysis: Towards More Descriptive Simplicity and More Explanatory Adequacy Radial Representations of the Semantics of Reduplicative Constructions in Nigerian Pidgin (Naija) Words of Wonder: The Cognitive and Semantic Dimension of the Literal and Figurative Denominators for wonder in Old English Sources Inconsistency in Conceptual Metaphor Theory Speakers’ Gestures and Semantic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1