The “legitimation” of hostility towards immigrants’ languages in press and social media: Main fallacies and how to challenge them

Q2 Arts and Humanities Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Pub Date : 2018-06-26 DOI:10.1515/lpp-2018-0006
A. Musolff
{"title":"The “legitimation” of hostility towards immigrants’ languages in press and social media: Main fallacies and how to challenge them","authors":"A. Musolff","doi":"10.1515/lpp-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract On the basis of internet forum and press media data, this article studies the expression of hostile attitudes towards multilingualism and multiculturalism in the context of debates about immigration. The forum data are drawn from the BBC’s Have Your Say website, which is a moderated forum that excludes polemical and abusive postings. Nevertheless, it still seems to provide its users ample opportunity for airing strongly anti-immigrant attitudes. The narratives in which these attitudes are being expressed are exemplary stories of the posters’ supposed encounters with the use of foreign languages in the street, in the workplace or at school. This presence of foreign languages in the British public sphere is evaluated as being (at least) problematic and is “explained” as a result of mass immigration, which serves to reinforce the scenario of a culture mix that will destroy British “home” culture. Media coverage of immigration partly supports such vilification of multilingualism and multiculturalism, and the reports and comments often seem to be drawn from similar narrative-argumentative templates as those of the discussions on Have Your Say. In conclusion, we argue that counterspeech informed by Critical Discourse Analysis has to develop alternative narratives and figurative scenarios that question the bias against linguistic and cultural diversity.","PeriodicalId":39423,"journal":{"name":"Lodz Papers in Pragmatics","volume":"14 1","pages":"117 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/lpp-2018-0006","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lodz Papers in Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract On the basis of internet forum and press media data, this article studies the expression of hostile attitudes towards multilingualism and multiculturalism in the context of debates about immigration. The forum data are drawn from the BBC’s Have Your Say website, which is a moderated forum that excludes polemical and abusive postings. Nevertheless, it still seems to provide its users ample opportunity for airing strongly anti-immigrant attitudes. The narratives in which these attitudes are being expressed are exemplary stories of the posters’ supposed encounters with the use of foreign languages in the street, in the workplace or at school. This presence of foreign languages in the British public sphere is evaluated as being (at least) problematic and is “explained” as a result of mass immigration, which serves to reinforce the scenario of a culture mix that will destroy British “home” culture. Media coverage of immigration partly supports such vilification of multilingualism and multiculturalism, and the reports and comments often seem to be drawn from similar narrative-argumentative templates as those of the discussions on Have Your Say. In conclusion, we argue that counterspeech informed by Critical Discourse Analysis has to develop alternative narratives and figurative scenarios that question the bias against linguistic and cultural diversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体和社交媒体上对移民语言的敌意“合法化”:主要谬论和如何挑战它们
摘要基于互联网论坛和新闻媒体的数据,本文研究了在移民辩论的背景下,对多语主义和多元文化主义的敌对态度的表达。论坛数据来自英国广播公司的Have Your Say网站,这是一个有节制的论坛,不包括争论性和辱骂性的帖子。尽管如此,它似乎仍然为用户提供了充分的机会来表达强烈的反移民态度。表达这些态度的叙事是海报在街上、工作场所或学校中使用外语的典型故事。外语在英国公共领域的存在被评估为(至少)有问题,并被“解释”为大规模移民的结果,这有助于强化文化混合的情景,破坏英国的“本土”文化。媒体对移民的报道在一定程度上支持了对多语主义和多元文化主义的诋毁,这些报道和评论似乎往往来自于与《有你的发言权》讨论类似的叙事性辩论模板。总之,我们认为,批判性话语分析所提供的反诉必须发展出替代叙事和比喻场景,以质疑对语言和文化多样性的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writer and participant visibility in quantitative and qualitative research: a corpus-assisted study of human agent verbs in health science publications The most common graphicons in Mexican Spanish speaking WhatsApp communities composed of school parents Ecological discourse analysis and meaning interpretation of BBC news reports on 2019 Australian bushfires from the perspective of transitivity system A multimodal contrastive analysis of regulations and instructions during the COVID-19 lockdown in the context of the Island of Madeira and the United Kingdom Apology strategies in Tashelhit: linguistic realization and religious influence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1