Has the Crisis Introduced a New Paradigm in Banks' Credit Allocation? The Non-financial Corporations' Perspective

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1111/fmii.12141
Andresa Lopes, Vítor Oliveira, Ângelo Ramos, Fátima Silva
{"title":"Has the Crisis Introduced a New Paradigm in Banks' Credit Allocation? The Non-financial Corporations' Perspective","authors":"Andresa Lopes,&nbsp;Vítor Oliveira,&nbsp;Ângelo Ramos,&nbsp;Fátima Silva","doi":"10.1111/fmii.12141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the years prior to the onset of the global financial crisis, the sharp credit growth, in a context of optimistic income expectations, boosted by an increase in competition in the banking system, less restrictive lending criteria and favorable financing conditions in international wholesale debt market, led to a marked rise in the debt levels of non-financial corporations. In this paper, we use a panel data regression, with fixed effect estimators, to study how the relationship between bank credit granted to each firm and a set of firm-specific indicators, that measure overall balance sheet performance and riskiness, changed over the 2006–2017 period. The results suggest that, during and after the Portuguese sovereign debt crisis, the sensitivity of the bank credit granted to firms to overall balance sheet strength and riskiness of firms increased, except in the case of leverage, where the sensitivity decreased slightly. Nonetheless, banks on average lent more to lower leveraged firms than to higher leveraged firms throughout the period considered. The results also show that statistical significance slightly reduces with the size of the firm and, when compared with the pre-crisis sub-period, banks did not increase lending to higher leveraged large firms in the crisis and post-crisis sub-periods. Finally, we find that the most capitalized banks were the ones more willing and/or able to support firms, during the crisis, even firms that experienced a deterioration in their indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":39670,"journal":{"name":"Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments","volume":"30 2","pages":"31-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/fmii.12141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fmii.12141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the years prior to the onset of the global financial crisis, the sharp credit growth, in a context of optimistic income expectations, boosted by an increase in competition in the banking system, less restrictive lending criteria and favorable financing conditions in international wholesale debt market, led to a marked rise in the debt levels of non-financial corporations. In this paper, we use a panel data regression, with fixed effect estimators, to study how the relationship between bank credit granted to each firm and a set of firm-specific indicators, that measure overall balance sheet performance and riskiness, changed over the 2006–2017 period. The results suggest that, during and after the Portuguese sovereign debt crisis, the sensitivity of the bank credit granted to firms to overall balance sheet strength and riskiness of firms increased, except in the case of leverage, where the sensitivity decreased slightly. Nonetheless, banks on average lent more to lower leveraged firms than to higher leveraged firms throughout the period considered. The results also show that statistical significance slightly reduces with the size of the firm and, when compared with the pre-crisis sub-period, banks did not increase lending to higher leveraged large firms in the crisis and post-crisis sub-periods. Finally, we find that the most capitalized banks were the ones more willing and/or able to support firms, during the crisis, even firms that experienced a deterioration in their indicators.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机是否为银行信贷配置引入了一种新模式?非金融公司视角
在全球金融危机爆发前的几年里,在乐观的收入预期背景下,由于银行体系竞争加剧、贷款标准限制减少以及国际批发债务市场有利的融资条件,信贷急剧增长,导致非金融企业的债务水平显著上升。在本文中,我们使用固定效应估计器的面板数据回归来研究2006-2017年期间,每家公司获得的银行信贷与一组衡量整体资产负债表绩效和风险的公司特定指标之间的关系如何变化。结果表明,在葡萄牙主权债务危机期间和之后,银行授予企业的信贷对企业整体资产负债表实力和风险的敏感性增加,但杠杆的敏感性略有下降。尽管如此,在此期间,银行向杠杆率较低的公司发放的贷款平均多于向杠杆率较高的公司发放的贷款。结果还表明,随着公司规模的扩大,统计显著性略有降低,与危机前的子阶段相比,银行在危机和危机后的子阶段都没有增加对高杠杆大公司的贷款。最后,我们发现资本最充足的银行是那些在危机期间更愿意和/或有能力支持公司的银行,即使是那些指标恶化的公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments
Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments bridges the gap between the academic and professional finance communities. With contributions from leading academics, as well as practitioners from organizations such as the SEC and the Federal Reserve, the journal is equally relevant to both groups. Each issue is devoted to a single topic, which is examined in depth, and a special fifth issue is published annually highlighting the most significant developments in money and banking, derivative securities, corporate finance, and fixed-income securities.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Do banks adjust their capital when they face liquidity shortages? Evidence from U.S. commercial banks Piercing through the haze: Did PPP increase versus decrease bank efficiency? Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1