Repatriation or Redefection? Cold War Refugees as Contested Assets, 1955–1956

Q1 Social Sciences Dve Domovini Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI:10.3986/dd.2022.1.07
A. Mazurkiewicz
{"title":"Repatriation or Redefection? Cold War Refugees as Contested Assets, 1955–1956","authors":"A. Mazurkiewicz","doi":"10.3986/dd.2022.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the response of a united representation of Cold War era exiles (Assembly of Captive European Nations, ACEN) to the Moscow-inspired repatriation campaign of 1955. The article’s focus rests on the US-sponsored exile political activities carried under the aegis of the Free Europe Committee. The year 1955 serves as a particularly interesting moment when both key adversaries in the Cold War were engaged in programs using migration as a tool to advance their political goals. The issue of political exiles’ agency is signaled based on the Polish case in the context of American redefection programs and Washington’s response to the Soviet Bloc campaign to demoralize anti-communist escapees and induce their return.","PeriodicalId":35249,"journal":{"name":"Dve Domovini","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dve Domovini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/dd.2022.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines the response of a united representation of Cold War era exiles (Assembly of Captive European Nations, ACEN) to the Moscow-inspired repatriation campaign of 1955. The article’s focus rests on the US-sponsored exile political activities carried under the aegis of the Free Europe Committee. The year 1955 serves as a particularly interesting moment when both key adversaries in the Cold War were engaged in programs using migration as a tool to advance their political goals. The issue of political exiles’ agency is signaled based on the Polish case in the context of American redefection programs and Washington’s response to the Soviet Bloc campaign to demoralize anti-communist escapees and induce their return.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遣返还是再次感染?1955年至1956年,冷战时期难民作为竞争资产
这篇文章考察了冷战时期流亡者的联合代表(被俘欧洲国家大会)对1955年莫斯科发起的遣返运动的反应。这篇文章的重点是美国在自由欧洲委员会的支持下发起的流亡政治活动。1955年是一个特别有趣的时刻,冷战中的两个主要对手都参与了将移民作为推进其政治目标的工具的计划。政治流亡者的代理问题是基于美国重新感染计划背景下的波兰案件,以及华盛顿对苏联集团打击反共逃亡者士气并促使他们回国的运动的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dve Domovini
Dve Domovini Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Knjižna ocena - Gregor Antoličič, Maksimilijan. Cesar po Napoleonovi milosti Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba, 2022, 191 str. Reprezentacije doma in hrepenenja po domu v procesih nacionalizacije slovenske narodnozabavne glasbe Opomenjanje povezav med glasbo, identitetami in vrednotami Migracije nacionalizacije glasbe: od ljudske k narodnozabavni Book Review - Fabio Perocco (ed.), Migration and Torture in Today’s World Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, 2023, 290 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1