Understanding students as hosts: moving beyond sightseeing

IF 2.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research Pub Date : 2021-07-10 DOI:10.1108/IJCTHR-09-2020-0215
Tanja Petry, B. Pikkemaat, Chung-Shing Chan, Ursula Scholl-Grissemann
{"title":"Understanding students as hosts: moving beyond sightseeing","authors":"Tanja Petry, B. Pikkemaat, Chung-Shing Chan, Ursula Scholl-Grissemann","doi":"10.1108/IJCTHR-09-2020-0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nNeither visitors of visiting friends and relatives (VFR) travel nor hosts are homogeneous segments (Griffin & Guttenberg, 2020). For this reason, this study aims to address students as hosts of VFR travel and analyzes differences in the visitor and the host segment. As a result, marketing implications for destination marketing organizations that seek to realize the potential of the student VFR segment arise.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research project adopts a multi-method approach to derive a deeper empirical understanding of visitors’ behaviors and the role of students hosting friends and relatives (SHFR). The quantitative study aims to reveal the relevance and differences between visits to friends (VF) and visits to relatives (VR), whereas the qualitative study elaborates on the findings of the quantitative study and seeks to understand the role and experiences of students as hosts.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings reveal that VR and VF travelers vary in terms of their expenditure. Hosts’ spending depends on visitors’ budgets; in general, both their direct and indirect (when relatives pay) spending increases when they have visitors. Furthermore, the data identify two distinct hosting styles: functional hosting is concerned with providing outstanding hospitality based on a more traditional, guest-oriented understanding of the role, whereas integrative hosting blurs the lines between hospitality and lifestyle based on a more modern, host-oriented understanding of the role.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nRegarding limitations, this study did not differentiate between students who were simultaneously locals and students who resided in the city only for study purposes. In a similar vein, the cultural background of the students was not considered in the research. Finally, the differences between VF and VR could further be explored in a quantitative follow-up study and in testing for significant differences in SHFR spending behaviors. Further research could examine whether domestic travelers, travelers with cultural proximity and/or short-distance VFR travelers are more likely to visit after COVID-19 as suggested by Backer and Ritchie (2017) in the case of crises and disaster.\n\n\nPractical implications\nStudents as hosts differ from other hosts in VFR travel in their reluctance to embrace conventional tourism products. This study found that place attachment makes hosts of VFR travelers passionate ambassadors and advertisers for the destinations; destination marketing organizations (DMOs) could support this already positive image by providing and supporting students with more detailed information about their cities and the opportunities they offer. Results are of particular relevance because the COVID-19 pandemic is forcing DMOs to develop destination strategies that incorporate social-distancing and avoid crowded places.\n\n\nSocial implications\nWhen students take their friends out to events and nightclubs, they contribute significantly to experiences that go beyond typical tourism activities such as sightseeing and shopping. By offering special discounts to visitors who come with their hosts, DMOs could help visitors delve more deeply into city life and thereby reduce the likeliness of crowded city centers. Considering the findings relating to the social and emotional qualities of VFR travel, DMO marketing to VFR travelers could benefit from promoting socio-cultural spaces and offerings that value groups’ social ties (e.g. family prices for families with adult children) or alumni status.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAccording to the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first which analyzes both, visitors and hosts of VFR travel using a two methods approach. Very recently, Griffin and Guttenberg (2020) miss VFR research focusing on the heterogeneity of the segment, and Backer et al. (2020) claim for more VFR research on the role of hosts carried out outside of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK and the USA. To the authors’ best knowledge, this study is the first which delivers empirical insights on SHFR in Central Europe.\n","PeriodicalId":51561,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-09-2020-0215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Neither visitors of visiting friends and relatives (VFR) travel nor hosts are homogeneous segments (Griffin & Guttenberg, 2020). For this reason, this study aims to address students as hosts of VFR travel and analyzes differences in the visitor and the host segment. As a result, marketing implications for destination marketing organizations that seek to realize the potential of the student VFR segment arise. Design/methodology/approach This research project adopts a multi-method approach to derive a deeper empirical understanding of visitors’ behaviors and the role of students hosting friends and relatives (SHFR). The quantitative study aims to reveal the relevance and differences between visits to friends (VF) and visits to relatives (VR), whereas the qualitative study elaborates on the findings of the quantitative study and seeks to understand the role and experiences of students as hosts. Findings The findings reveal that VR and VF travelers vary in terms of their expenditure. Hosts’ spending depends on visitors’ budgets; in general, both their direct and indirect (when relatives pay) spending increases when they have visitors. Furthermore, the data identify two distinct hosting styles: functional hosting is concerned with providing outstanding hospitality based on a more traditional, guest-oriented understanding of the role, whereas integrative hosting blurs the lines between hospitality and lifestyle based on a more modern, host-oriented understanding of the role. Research limitations/implications Regarding limitations, this study did not differentiate between students who were simultaneously locals and students who resided in the city only for study purposes. In a similar vein, the cultural background of the students was not considered in the research. Finally, the differences between VF and VR could further be explored in a quantitative follow-up study and in testing for significant differences in SHFR spending behaviors. Further research could examine whether domestic travelers, travelers with cultural proximity and/or short-distance VFR travelers are more likely to visit after COVID-19 as suggested by Backer and Ritchie (2017) in the case of crises and disaster. Practical implications Students as hosts differ from other hosts in VFR travel in their reluctance to embrace conventional tourism products. This study found that place attachment makes hosts of VFR travelers passionate ambassadors and advertisers for the destinations; destination marketing organizations (DMOs) could support this already positive image by providing and supporting students with more detailed information about their cities and the opportunities they offer. Results are of particular relevance because the COVID-19 pandemic is forcing DMOs to develop destination strategies that incorporate social-distancing and avoid crowded places. Social implications When students take their friends out to events and nightclubs, they contribute significantly to experiences that go beyond typical tourism activities such as sightseeing and shopping. By offering special discounts to visitors who come with their hosts, DMOs could help visitors delve more deeply into city life and thereby reduce the likeliness of crowded city centers. Considering the findings relating to the social and emotional qualities of VFR travel, DMO marketing to VFR travelers could benefit from promoting socio-cultural spaces and offerings that value groups’ social ties (e.g. family prices for families with adult children) or alumni status. Originality/value According to the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first which analyzes both, visitors and hosts of VFR travel using a two methods approach. Very recently, Griffin and Guttenberg (2020) miss VFR research focusing on the heterogeneity of the segment, and Backer et al. (2020) claim for more VFR research on the role of hosts carried out outside of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK and the USA. To the authors’ best knowledge, this study is the first which delivers empirical insights on SHFR in Central Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解学生作为东道主:超越观光
目的拜访亲友(VFR)旅行的访客和东道主都不是同质群体(Griffin&Guttenberg,2020)。因此,本研究旨在将学生作为VFR旅行的东道主,并分析访客和东道主群体的差异。因此,寻求实现学生VFR细分市场潜力的目的地营销组织的营销含义出现了。设计/方法论/方法本研究项目采用多种方法,对来访者的行为以及学生接待亲友的角色(SHFR)有更深入的实证理解。定量研究旨在揭示拜访朋友(VF)和拜访亲戚(VR)之间的相关性和差异,而定性研究则阐述了定量研究的结果,并试图了解学生作为东道主的角色和经历。调查结果显示,虚拟现实和虚拟现实旅行者的支出各不相同。东道主的支出取决于游客的预算;一般来说,当他们有访客时,他们的直接和间接(当亲属付费时)支出都会增加。此外,数据确定了两种不同的主持风格:功能性主持是基于对角色的更传统、以客人为导向的理解来提供出色的款待,而综合性主持则基于对角色更现代、以主人为导向的了解来模糊款待和生活方式之间的界限。研究局限性/含义关于局限性,本研究没有区分同时是当地人的学生和仅出于研究目的居住在城市的学生。同样,研究中也没有考虑学生的文化背景。最后,VF和VR之间的差异可以在定量随访研究和SHFR支出行为的显著差异测试中进一步探讨。进一步的研究可以检验国内旅行者、文化接近的旅行者和/或短途VFR旅行者是否更有可能在新冠肺炎后访问,如Backer和Ritchie(2017)在危机和灾难的情况下所建议的那样。实际含义作为东道主的学生与VFR旅行中的其他东道主不同,他们不愿意接受传统的旅游产品。这项研究发现,地点依恋使VFR旅行者的主人成为目的地的热情大使和广告商;目的地营销组织(DMO)可以通过向学生提供关于他们所在城市和他们提供的机会的更详细的信息来支持这种已经很积极的形象。结果具有特别的相关性,因为新冠肺炎大流行迫使地方管理组织制定目的地策略,将社交距离纳入其中,避免拥挤的地方。社会影响当学生带朋友去参加活动和夜总会时,他们会对超出观光和购物等典型旅游活动的体验做出重大贡献。DMO通过向与主人同行的游客提供特别折扣,可以帮助游客更深入地了解城市生活,从而降低拥挤市中心的可能性。考虑到与VFR旅行的社会和情感品质有关的研究结果,面向VFR旅行者的DMO营销可以受益于促进重视群体社会关系(例如,有成年子女的家庭的家庭价格)或校友身份的社会文化空间和产品。创意/价值据作者所知,本研究首次采用两种方法对VFR旅行的游客和主人进行分析。最近,Griffin和Guttenberg(2020)错过了专注于该细分市场异质性的VFR研究,Backer等人(2020)声称在澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大、英国和美国以外的地方进行了更多关于宿主作用的VFR研究。据作者所知,这项研究是第一次对中欧SHFR提供实证见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Culture, Tourism, and Hospitality Research focuses on building bridges in theory, research, and practice across the inter-related fields of culture, tourism and hospitality. Published with the IACTHR it encourages articles that advance theory and research on the roles of culture, tourism, and hospitality in the lives of individuals, households, and organizations. This includes the perspectives and interpretations of all stakeholders including participants and providers of tourism and hospitality services. The journal especially seeks to nurture interdisciplinary multicultural work among sociological, psychological, geographical, consumer, leisure, marketing, travel and tourism, hospitality, and sport and entertainment researchers. IJCTHR covers: -Tourist culture and behaviour -Marketing practices in tourism and hospitality, and how this relates to cultures -Consumer behaviour and trends in tourism and hospitality -Destination culture and destination marketing -International tourism and hospitality
期刊最新文献
The challenges of presenting traditional music in gastronomic establishments – the case of Slovenian Istria The relationship between employer image and employee commitment in family-run hospitality firms Interconnections between the cultural and creative industries and tourism: challenges in four Ibero-American capital cities Insights from sentiment analysis to leverage local tourism business in restaurants The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration in the hotel sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1