SOVEREIGNTY AND LEGAL PERSONALITY: A LESSON FROM EUROPEAN UNION'S EVOLUTION TO SUPRANATIONALISM

M. B. Ulum
{"title":"SOVEREIGNTY AND LEGAL PERSONALITY: A LESSON FROM EUROPEAN UNION'S EVOLUTION TO SUPRANATIONALISM","authors":"M. B. Ulum","doi":"10.25041/lajil.v3i2.2517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sovereignty remains a crucial debate in international law. Simultaneously, regionalism offers a new pathway for which sovereignty is often contested whether it surrenders due to economic interests. This paper revisits the notion of state sovereignty in the light of economic globalization and enquires about legal personality in international relations. Overall, this paper emphasizes revisiting the concept of sovereignty and legal personality in this 21st century, which has evolved amidst the more globalized world due to international economic relations. The present study was based on historical and analytical methods as doctrinal research. The historical approach was adopted to study international treaties and agreements to know the historical background and evolution of international economic law institutions. Then, it exemplified the European Union's evolution that transcends the state boundaries, following the debate on the relevance of the state sovereignty after the Brexit case under the discussion of the waning of the state sovereignty. Finally, this discussion ended with the international legal personality owned by regional bodies, taking the EU and ASEAN as the comparison. At the outset, the EU was projected as the new governance structure that gradually disrupted the state concept under the Westphalian Peace 1648 due to its member states' desire to form the state-level structure. The European Union redefines the new model of sovereignty against the Westphalian model, which is incomparable to the ASEAN intergovernmental model and other regional bodies regarding sovereignty concerns and legal personality.","PeriodicalId":34314,"journal":{"name":"Lampung Journal of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lampung Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v3i2.2517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sovereignty remains a crucial debate in international law. Simultaneously, regionalism offers a new pathway for which sovereignty is often contested whether it surrenders due to economic interests. This paper revisits the notion of state sovereignty in the light of economic globalization and enquires about legal personality in international relations. Overall, this paper emphasizes revisiting the concept of sovereignty and legal personality in this 21st century, which has evolved amidst the more globalized world due to international economic relations. The present study was based on historical and analytical methods as doctrinal research. The historical approach was adopted to study international treaties and agreements to know the historical background and evolution of international economic law institutions. Then, it exemplified the European Union's evolution that transcends the state boundaries, following the debate on the relevance of the state sovereignty after the Brexit case under the discussion of the waning of the state sovereignty. Finally, this discussion ended with the international legal personality owned by regional bodies, taking the EU and ASEAN as the comparison. At the outset, the EU was projected as the new governance structure that gradually disrupted the state concept under the Westphalian Peace 1648 due to its member states' desire to form the state-level structure. The European Union redefines the new model of sovereignty against the Westphalian model, which is incomparable to the ASEAN intergovernmental model and other regional bodies regarding sovereignty concerns and legal personality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主权与法律人格:欧盟向超民族主义演进的经验教训
主权问题仍然是国际法中的一个重要辩论。同时,区域主义提供了一条新的途径,无论主权是否因经济利益而放弃,它都经常受到质疑。本文从经济全球化的角度重新审视了国家主权的概念,并对国际关系中的法律人格问题进行了探讨。总体而言,本文强调重新审视21世纪的主权和法人概念,这一概念是在国际经济关系日益全球化的世界中演变而来的。本研究以历史和分析方法为基础,作为理论研究。采用历史方法研究国际条约和协定,以了解国际经济法机构的历史背景和演变。然后,它举例说明了欧盟超越国家边界的演变,在英国脱欧案后关于国家主权相关性的辩论和国家主权减弱的讨论之后。最后,本文以欧盟和东盟为比较对象,以区域机构所拥有的国际法人资格为结束语。一开始,欧盟被认为是1648年威斯特伐利亚和平时期的新治理结构,由于其成员国希望形成国家级结构,该结构逐渐颠覆了国家概念。欧洲联盟针对威斯特伐利亚模式重新定义了新的主权模式,这是东盟政府间模式和其他区域机构在主权关切和法律人格方面无法比拟的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
ASEAN REGULATION OF SENSITIVE SPACE TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Legitimacy of The CJEU In the Settlement of Trade Mark Disputes of Non-European Union Foreign Companies: A Case Study PORTUGUESE IMPERIAL BUILDING IN THE KOTTE KINGDOM OF SRI LANKA AS A REFLECTION OF 16TH CENTURY INTERNATIONAL LAW RIGHT TO LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR COMMUNITIES UNABLE TO OBTAIN JUSTICE ACCORDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE Political and Cultural Boundaries in the Conflict between Indonesia and China in the South China Sea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1