Cytogenetics evaluation of 261 couples with first-trimester recurrent pregnancy loss: A prevalent case–control study

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Marine Medical Society Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.4103/jmms.jmms_105_22
Paresh Singhal, S. Raghavendra, Barun K. Chakrabarty, Ganesh Pendkur, C. Pendharkar, Gurpreet Sagoo
{"title":"Cytogenetics evaluation of 261 couples with first-trimester recurrent pregnancy loss: A prevalent case–control study","authors":"Paresh Singhal, S. Raghavendra, Barun K. Chakrabarty, Ganesh Pendkur, C. Pendharkar, Gurpreet Sagoo","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_105_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common occurrence which affects approximately 15-20% of couples. Chromosomal abnormality is an important cause of recurrent abortions especially if either of the partner is a carrier of balanced translocation. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples suffering from first trimester RPL and compare with normal control. Materials and Methods: A prospective case-control study, in which 261 couples with history of two or more abortions were evaluated for various chromosomal abnormalities; and compared with 190 healthy couples with no history of abortion and at least one normal biological child. Peripheral blood T-lymphocytes were cultured using RPMI-1640 medium for obtaining metaphases and chromosomal analysis. SPSS software and Student's t test were used. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 261 couples in RPL group, 240(91.95%) had normal karyotype, 17(6.51%) had major chromosomal abnormalities and 04(1.53%) had polymorphic variants. Most of the couples had two abortions (39.8%). Females were more commonly affected with M:F=0.214. Structural abnormalities (n=12,70.59%) were more frequent than numerical abnormalities (n=5,29.41%). There was no statistical correlation between age, number of abortions and major chromosomal abnormalities (p=0.06). Conclusion: Chromosomal aberrations in carrier parents, predispose them to RPL and can also be transmitted to the offspring which may results in imbalance in their genetic constitution, thus justifying the requirement of cytogenetic testing in these patients.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_105_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common occurrence which affects approximately 15-20% of couples. Chromosomal abnormality is an important cause of recurrent abortions especially if either of the partner is a carrier of balanced translocation. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples suffering from first trimester RPL and compare with normal control. Materials and Methods: A prospective case-control study, in which 261 couples with history of two or more abortions were evaluated for various chromosomal abnormalities; and compared with 190 healthy couples with no history of abortion and at least one normal biological child. Peripheral blood T-lymphocytes were cultured using RPMI-1640 medium for obtaining metaphases and chromosomal analysis. SPSS software and Student's t test were used. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 261 couples in RPL group, 240(91.95%) had normal karyotype, 17(6.51%) had major chromosomal abnormalities and 04(1.53%) had polymorphic variants. Most of the couples had two abortions (39.8%). Females were more commonly affected with M:F=0.214. Structural abnormalities (n=12,70.59%) were more frequent than numerical abnormalities (n=5,29.41%). There was no statistical correlation between age, number of abortions and major chromosomal abnormalities (p=0.06). Conclusion: Chromosomal aberrations in carrier parents, predispose them to RPL and can also be transmitted to the offspring which may results in imbalance in their genetic constitution, thus justifying the requirement of cytogenetic testing in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
261对妊娠早期复发性流产夫妇的细胞遗传学评估:一项流行的病例对照研究
引言:复发性流产(RPL)是一种常见的疾病,约有15-20%的夫妇受到影响。染色体异常是反复流产的重要原因,尤其是如果伴侣中的任何一方是平衡易位携带者。目前的研究旨在确定妊娠早期RPL夫妇染色体异常的发生率,并与正常对照组进行比较。材料和方法:前瞻性病例对照研究,对261对有两次或两次以上流产史的夫妇的各种染色体异常进行评估;并与190对没有堕胎史和至少一个正常亲生子女的健康夫妇进行了比较。使用RPMI-1640培养基培养外周血T淋巴细胞以获得中期和染色体分析。采用SPSS软件和Student t检验。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:RPL组261对夫妇中,240对(91.95%)染色体组型正常,17对(6.51%)染色体异常,04对(1.53%)染色体多态。大多数夫妇有两次流产(39.8%)。女性更常见的影响是M:F=0.214。结构异常(n=12,70.59%)比数量异常(n=5,29.41%)更常见。年龄、流产次数和主要染色体异常之间没有统计学相关性(p=0.06)。结论:携带者父母的染色体畸变,使他们易患RPL,也可能传播给后代,这可能导致他们的遗传结构失衡,从而证明对这些患者进行细胞遗传学检测的要求是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contrast-induced Nephropathy: Incidence and Reversibility in Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Autologous Fat Grafting: Whom does it satisfy: Patient or Surgeon? Beyond Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Expansive Realm of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease A Study of Sociodemographic Profile and Factors Associated with Dermatophytosis in Tropical Climates with Comparison among Treatment-Naive and Those Who Have Abused Topical Corticosteroids/Combination Baboon Syndrome Due to Clotrimazole Topical Preparation with Unusual Route of Entry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1