Quality control of cytotoxic infusions disturbed by a change of infusion bag

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016
P. Quinio, Benoît Beiler, P. Lider, B. Demoré, J. Vigneron
{"title":"Quality control of cytotoxic infusions disturbed by a change of infusion bag","authors":"P. Quinio, Benoît Beiler, P. Lider, B. Demoré, J. Vigneron","doi":"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In our centralized unit for the preparation of anticancer drugs, quality control is carried out by flow injection analysis (FIA) with detection by photodiode array detector. Criteria of concentration acceptance were established with ±10% of the theoretical concentration. The infusions were prepared with polyolefin infusions bags (Easyflex). However, due to an Easyflex shortage, Viaflo infusion bags were used and cyclophosphamide (CPM) concentrations showed a 10% increase despite a similar manufacturing process. The objectives of this work were to study the influence of different containers on CPM concentrations measured by FIA and to investigate the origin of this artificial increase in concentration. Methods: Thirty infusions were prepared using 3 different infusion bags: Viaflo multilayer container, Ecoflac, low-density polyethylene, and Easyflex polyolefin bags. Vials of CPM 1g were reconstituted with 50mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. CPM was injected into 0.9% sodium chloride 250-mL infusion bags. Then 1mL samples were withdrawn to be analyzed by FIA, to determine CPM concentrations (ultraviolet detection at 205nm). Results: Mean CPM concentration values (n=10) were 3.52mg/mL for Viaflo infusions, 3.12mg/mL for Ecoflac infusions, and 3.16mg/mL for Easyflex infusions. CPM concentrations were higher in Viaflo infusion bags. This difference could be explained by e-caprolactam, a component released by the multilayer infusion bag. Conclusion: Viaflo infusion bags disturb outcomes of CPM dosage with a concentration artificially increased by about 10%. The FIA method cannot be used to quantify CPM at this concentration and at wavelength 205nm. Abbreviations: CPM = cyclophosphamide; FIA = flow injection analysis; HDPE = high-density polyethylene; HPLC = highperformance liquid chromatography; LDPE = low-density polyethylene; PDA = photodiode array; RP-HPLC = reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography; UV = ultraviolet.","PeriodicalId":39134,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In our centralized unit for the preparation of anticancer drugs, quality control is carried out by flow injection analysis (FIA) with detection by photodiode array detector. Criteria of concentration acceptance were established with ±10% of the theoretical concentration. The infusions were prepared with polyolefin infusions bags (Easyflex). However, due to an Easyflex shortage, Viaflo infusion bags were used and cyclophosphamide (CPM) concentrations showed a 10% increase despite a similar manufacturing process. The objectives of this work were to study the influence of different containers on CPM concentrations measured by FIA and to investigate the origin of this artificial increase in concentration. Methods: Thirty infusions were prepared using 3 different infusion bags: Viaflo multilayer container, Ecoflac, low-density polyethylene, and Easyflex polyolefin bags. Vials of CPM 1g were reconstituted with 50mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. CPM was injected into 0.9% sodium chloride 250-mL infusion bags. Then 1mL samples were withdrawn to be analyzed by FIA, to determine CPM concentrations (ultraviolet detection at 205nm). Results: Mean CPM concentration values (n=10) were 3.52mg/mL for Viaflo infusions, 3.12mg/mL for Ecoflac infusions, and 3.16mg/mL for Easyflex infusions. CPM concentrations were higher in Viaflo infusion bags. This difference could be explained by e-caprolactam, a component released by the multilayer infusion bag. Conclusion: Viaflo infusion bags disturb outcomes of CPM dosage with a concentration artificially increased by about 10%. The FIA method cannot be used to quantify CPM at this concentration and at wavelength 205nm. Abbreviations: CPM = cyclophosphamide; FIA = flow injection analysis; HDPE = high-density polyethylene; HPLC = highperformance liquid chromatography; LDPE = low-density polyethylene; PDA = photodiode array; RP-HPLC = reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography; UV = ultraviolet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输液袋更换干扰细胞毒性输液的质量控制
简介:在我们的抗癌药物集中制备单元中,质量控制通过流动注射分析(FIA)进行,并通过光电二极管阵列检测器进行检测。浓度接受标准采用理论浓度的±10%。用聚烯烃输液袋(Easyflex)制备输液。然而,由于Easyflex短缺,使用了Viaflo输液袋,尽管采用了类似的生产工艺,环磷酰胺(CPM)浓度仍增加了10%。这项工作的目的是研究不同容器对FIA测量的CPM浓度的影响,并研究这种人为增加浓度的原因。方法:使用3种不同的输液袋制备30种输液:Viaflo多层容器、Ecoflac、低密度聚乙烯和Easyflex聚烯烃袋。CPM 1g的小瓶用50mL 0.9%氯化钠重新配制。CPM注入0.9%氯化钠250mL输液袋中。然后提取1mL样品,通过FIA进行分析,以确定CPM浓度(205nm紫外检测)。结果:Viaflo输注的CPM平均浓度值(n=10)为3.52mg/mL,Ecoflac输注为3.12mg/mL,Easyflex输注为3.16mg/mL。Viaflo输液袋中CPM浓度较高。这种差异可以通过多层输液袋释放的成分e-己内酰胺来解释。结论:Viaflo输液袋干扰CPM剂量的结果,其浓度人为增加了约10%。FIA方法不能用于量化在该浓度和波长205nm下的CPM。缩写:CPM=环磷酰胺;FIA=流动注射分析;HDPE=高密度聚乙烯;HPLC=高效液相色谱法;LDPE=低密度聚乙烯;PDA=光电二极管阵列;RP-HPLC=反相高效液相色谱法;UV=紫外线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Genotypic variations of the CYP2D6 gene in patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: case series Alternative chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with Down syndrome Physicochemical stability of pemetrexed diarginine at 25 mg/mL in partially-used vials and at 3 and 12 mg/mL diluted in dextrose 5% or in sodium chloride 0.9% in polyolefin bags Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard of care in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Impact of COVID-19 of oncology pharmacy services: Results of 8-months survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1