Far-side occupant responses based on current US side-impact protocol using finite element human body models

Syed Imam, Hwai Chang Wu, King H. Yang, S. Barbat
{"title":"Far-side occupant responses based on current US side-impact protocol using finite element human body models","authors":"Syed Imam, Hwai Chang Wu, King H. Yang, S. Barbat","doi":"10.1504/ijvs.2019.10023482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the applied vehicle side-impact occupant protection research to date has concentrated on near-side occupants. Currently, no regulation exists in North America for the far-side occupant protection. Real-world crash data has shown that occupants seated on the non-struck side, defined as 'far-side' occupants, are still subjected to a risk of injuries. The objective of this study is to investigate body responses for the far-side occupant using current US side impact protocols. Current side impact protocol in the USA is designed to meet side Moving Deformable Barrier (MDB) and fixed oblique pole impact. Two seating cases are addressed; the first case consisted of a far-side occupant in the first row (single occupant) to evaluate the interaction of the occupant to the structure. The second case, a near-side occupant, was added to the far-side occupant (two occupants in a row) to study the interaction of the occupant-to-occupant. A finite element human body model (50th male) was used as a far-side and near-side occupant. Simulation results indicated that the LINCAP barrier could potentially produce the significant head rotational acceleration and thoracic rib deflection if the far-side occupant was included in the existing near-side crash protocols.","PeriodicalId":35143,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vehicle Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vehicle Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvs.2019.10023482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of the applied vehicle side-impact occupant protection research to date has concentrated on near-side occupants. Currently, no regulation exists in North America for the far-side occupant protection. Real-world crash data has shown that occupants seated on the non-struck side, defined as 'far-side' occupants, are still subjected to a risk of injuries. The objective of this study is to investigate body responses for the far-side occupant using current US side impact protocols. Current side impact protocol in the USA is designed to meet side Moving Deformable Barrier (MDB) and fixed oblique pole impact. Two seating cases are addressed; the first case consisted of a far-side occupant in the first row (single occupant) to evaluate the interaction of the occupant to the structure. The second case, a near-side occupant, was added to the far-side occupant (two occupants in a row) to study the interaction of the occupant-to-occupant. A finite element human body model (50th male) was used as a far-side and near-side occupant. Simulation results indicated that the LINCAP barrier could potentially produce the significant head rotational acceleration and thoracic rib deflection if the far-side occupant was included in the existing near-side crash protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用有限元人体模型的基于当前美国侧面碰撞协议的远侧乘员响应
迄今为止,大多数应用车辆侧面碰撞乘员保护研究都集中在近侧乘员上。目前,北美没有关于远侧乘员保护的法规。真实世界的碰撞数据显示,坐在非碰撞侧的乘客(定义为“远侧”乘客)仍然有受伤的风险。本研究的目的是使用当前的美国侧面碰撞协议来调查远侧乘员的身体反应。美国目前的侧面碰撞协议旨在满足侧面移动可变形屏障(MDB)和固定斜杆碰撞的要求。处理了两个座位案例;第一种情况由第一排中的远侧乘员(单个乘员)组成,以评估乘员与结构的相互作用。第二种情况是,将近侧乘客添加到远侧乘客(一排两名乘客)中,以研究乘客与乘客之间的相互作用。使用有限元人体模型(第50名男性)作为远侧和近侧乘员。模拟结果表明,如果现有的近侧碰撞协议中包括远侧乘员,LINCAP护栏可能会产生显著的头部旋转加速度和胸肋偏转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Vehicle Safety
International Journal of Vehicle Safety Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IJVS aims to provide a refereed and authoritative source of information in the field of vehicle safety design, research, and development. It serves applied scientists, engineers, policy makers and safety advocates with a platform to develop, promote, and coordinate the science, technology and practice of vehicle safety. IJVS also seeks to establish channels of communication between industry and academy, industry and government in the field of vehicle safety. IJVS is published quarterly. It covers the subjects of passive and active safety in road traffic as well as traffic related public health issues, from impact biomechanics to vehicle crashworthiness, and from crash avoidance to intelligent highway systems.
期刊最新文献
Multi-objective optimisation design and fuzzy PID control for racing car variable rear wing system Driving safety of articulated vehicle on a typical interchange Multi-objective optimisation design and fuzzy PID control for racing car variable rear wing system Research on test scenarios of AEB pedestrian system based on knowledge and accident data Relationship between mobile phone addiction and driving accidents in two groups of drivers with and without accidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1