Brain smart – Let's play safely: Evaluation of a concussion education program in schools

K. Falla, Sarah Randall, C. DeMatteo
{"title":"Brain smart – Let's play safely: Evaluation of a concussion education program in schools","authors":"K. Falla, Sarah Randall, C. DeMatteo","doi":"10.1177/20597002211024447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives There are two objectives for this paper. First, to determine effects of a concussion education program in a local school board in terms of concussion-specific knowledge in children and confidence in identifying and managing concussion in adults. Second, to identify differences and similarities in concussion knowledge between children who participate in sports and those who do not and between children with a history of one or more concussions and those without. Design A cross sectional survey regarding concussion knowledge was distributed randomly to students and adults at both pre- and posteducation timepoints. A concussion education program was disseminated across the school board for students between the distribution survey timepoints. Following the education program, adults and students completed their respective post-test surveys. Chi-squared tests in SPSS determined the significance of between-group differences. Results All 17 adults (100.0%) who had received concussion education recently reported confidence in their knowledge of concussion management, compared to 35.7% adults who had not received education for over a year (p = 0.020). For students, all of whom completed the concussion education training between the pre- and post-tests, there were no significant differences in concussion knowledge scores between athletes and non-athletes (either in or outside of school) or between those with a history of concussion and those without. There were no significant changes in concussion knowledge between the pre- and post-tests, except for one question. Conclusion Concussion education programs increase confidence of concussion management protocols in adults involved in sport, but they require improvements to better support knowledge amelioration, particularly for target groups that are at high risk of sustaining another injury.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20597002211024447","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002211024447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives There are two objectives for this paper. First, to determine effects of a concussion education program in a local school board in terms of concussion-specific knowledge in children and confidence in identifying and managing concussion in adults. Second, to identify differences and similarities in concussion knowledge between children who participate in sports and those who do not and between children with a history of one or more concussions and those without. Design A cross sectional survey regarding concussion knowledge was distributed randomly to students and adults at both pre- and posteducation timepoints. A concussion education program was disseminated across the school board for students between the distribution survey timepoints. Following the education program, adults and students completed their respective post-test surveys. Chi-squared tests in SPSS determined the significance of between-group differences. Results All 17 adults (100.0%) who had received concussion education recently reported confidence in their knowledge of concussion management, compared to 35.7% adults who had not received education for over a year (p = 0.020). For students, all of whom completed the concussion education training between the pre- and post-tests, there were no significant differences in concussion knowledge scores between athletes and non-athletes (either in or outside of school) or between those with a history of concussion and those without. There were no significant changes in concussion knowledge between the pre- and post-tests, except for one question. Conclusion Concussion education programs increase confidence of concussion management protocols in adults involved in sport, but they require improvements to better support knowledge amelioration, particularly for target groups that are at high risk of sustaining another injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聪明的大脑——让我们安全地玩耍:对学校脑震荡教育项目的评估
目标本文有两个目标。首先,确定当地学校董事会脑震荡教育计划对儿童脑震荡特定知识的影响,以及对识别和管理成人脑震荡的信心。其次,确定参加体育运动的儿童与不参加体育运动儿童之间以及有一次或多次脑震荡史的儿童与没有脑震荡史儿童之间脑震荡知识的差异和相似性。设计一项关于脑震荡知识的横断面调查在教育前和教育后的时间点随机分配给学生和成年人。在分布调查时间点之间,学校董事会为学生分发了脑震荡教育计划。教育计划结束后,成人和学生完成了各自的测试后调查。SPSS中的卡方检验确定了组间差异的显著性。结果所有17名接受过脑震荡教育的成年人(100.0%)最近都对自己的脑震荡管理知识表示有信心,而一年以上未接受过教育的成年人中这一比例为35.7%(p = 0.020)。对于所有在测试前和测试后完成脑震荡教育训练的学生来说,运动员和非运动员(无论是在校内还是校外)之间,或者有脑震荡史的学生和没有脑震荡病史的学生之间,脑震荡知识分别没有显著差异。除了一个问题外,在测试前和测试后,脑震荡知识没有显著变化。结论脑震荡教育项目提高了参与体育运动的成年人对脑震荡管理方案的信心,但它们需要改进,以更好地支持知识改进,特别是对于有再次受伤高风险的目标群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do concussed and non-concussed head trauma individuals have similar symptoms? A retrospective chart review of chronic post-concussive symptomatology Providing a clearer insight into how sport-related concussion and physical pain impact mental health, cognition, and quality of life Parents’/guardians’ experiences with their adolescents’ prolonged recovery from a sport-related concussion A mixed methods investigation into athletic trainer and dietitian's nutrition practices for sport-related concussion patients Using eye-tracking technology to measure cognitive function in mild traumatic brain injury: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1