Misconceptions about neuroscience – prevalence and persistence of neuromyths in education

Q3 Medicine Neuroforum Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.1515/nf-2020-0006
Finja Grospietsch, Jürgen Mayer
{"title":"Misconceptions about neuroscience – prevalence and persistence of neuromyths in education","authors":"Finja Grospietsch, Jürgen Mayer","doi":"10.1515/nf-2020-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Brain-friendly learning is a new catchphrase in school and university instructional practice. However, it often escapes the notice of the teachers and learners involved that neurodidactics is not simply a plausible concept – it can also be a myth if applied incorrectly. Numerous international studies show that both pre-service and in-service teachers as well as university educators endorse misconceptions on the topic of learning and the brain and orient their didactic conception on so-called neuromyths. This paper presents nine neuromyths on the topic of learning and memory. Based on a review of the current research, we discuss what determines their emergence and prevalence, to what extent neuromyths pose a problem for practice, and why and how both neurodidactics and neuromyths should be made an object of university instruction.","PeriodicalId":56108,"journal":{"name":"Neuroforum","volume":"26 1","pages":"63 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroforum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/nf-2020-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Brain-friendly learning is a new catchphrase in school and university instructional practice. However, it often escapes the notice of the teachers and learners involved that neurodidactics is not simply a plausible concept – it can also be a myth if applied incorrectly. Numerous international studies show that both pre-service and in-service teachers as well as university educators endorse misconceptions on the topic of learning and the brain and orient their didactic conception on so-called neuromyths. This paper presents nine neuromyths on the topic of learning and memory. Based on a review of the current research, we discuss what determines their emergence and prevalence, to what extent neuromyths pose a problem for practice, and why and how both neurodidactics and neuromyths should be made an object of university instruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于神经科学的误解——神经体操在教育中的普遍性和持久性
摘要脑力友好学习是中小学教学实践中的一个新的流行语。然而,相关的教师和学习者往往没有注意到,神经教学法不仅仅是一个看似合理的概念——如果应用不当,它也可能是一个神话。许多国际研究表明,职前和在职教师以及大学教育工作者都赞同对学习和大脑主题的误解,并将他们的教学理念定位于所谓的神经体操。本文介绍了关于学习和记忆的九种神经体操。在回顾当前研究的基础上,我们讨论了是什么决定了它们的出现和流行,神经体操在多大程度上对实践构成了问题,以及为什么以及如何将神经教学法和神经体操都作为大学教学的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroforum
Neuroforum NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Neuroforum publishes invited review articles from all areas in neuroscience. Readership includes besides basic and medical neuroscientists also journalists, practicing physicians, school teachers and students. Neuroforum reports on all topics in neuroscience – from molecules to the neuronal networks, from synapses to bioethics.
期刊最新文献
Non-coding repeat expansions associated with familial adult myoclonic epilepsy: a new paradigm of gene-independent monogenic disorders Catching up in Cologne – 31st Neurobiology Doctoral Students Workshop in Cologne Neuroforum: vom gedruckten Heft ins elektronische Zeitalter Forebrain development–an intricate balance decides between health and disease The visual representation of space in the primate brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1