Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 × 2: More Different than Similar

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1177/07342829231185854
J. Lopez, C. Johnson, L. Dai, M. H. Jones, M. Nodine, D. Cooper, S. Eckel
{"title":"Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 × 2: More Different than Similar","authors":"J. Lopez, C. Johnson, L. Dai, M. H. Jones, M. Nodine, D. Cooper, S. Eckel","doi":"10.1177/07342829231185854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 × 2 (AGQ 3 × 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.","PeriodicalId":51446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","volume":"41 1","pages":"764 - 776"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829231185854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 × 2 (AGQ 3 × 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应性学习量表模式与成就目标问卷3×2:差异大于相似
本研究检验了两种常用的成就目标工具:适应性学习量表(PALS)和成就目标问卷3×2(AGQ 3×2)之间的收敛有效性。验证性因素分析和结构方程模型在本科生样本中测试了量表内和量表间的关系(N=363)。主要研究结果表明,PALS和AGQ 3×2在各自的仪器内的关系比在量表之间的关系更强。PALS和AGQ 3×2乐器的掌握目标之间有一些相似之处,但这两种乐器的表现目标之间的关系较弱或不相关。这些发现表明/突出了成就目标理论测量中持续存在的差异。未来的研究应该考虑PALS和AGQ 3×2目标可能在工具上衡量不同的理论结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (JPA) publishes contemporary and important information focusing on psychological and educational assessment research and evidence-based practices as well as assessment instrumentation. JPA is well known internationally for the quality of published assessment-related research, theory and practice papers, and book and test reviews. The methodologically sound and impiricially-based studies and critical test and book reviews will be of particular interest to all assessment specialists including practicing psychologists, psychoeducational consultants, educational diagnosticians and special educators.
期刊最新文献
Resolving Dimensionality Issues of the Utretch Work Engagement Scale for Students Using an Integrative Data-Analytic Framework Psychometric Properties of the School Support Scale (SSS) for a Sample of Chilean Adolescents Interpretation Evidence for the Multidimensional Test Anxiety Scale: A Brief Report Perceived School Belonging Among Youth with Chronic Physical Illness Florence Bullying-Victimization Scales: Validation Study and Victimization Associations With Well-Being and Social Self-Efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1