Не (совсем) акмеистическая трагедия: Лаодамия Иннокентия Анненского и Юдифь Николая Недоброво

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC RUSSIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.10.003
Роман Мних (Roman Mnich)
{"title":"Не (совсем) акмеистическая трагедия: Лаодамия Иннокентия Анненского и Юдифь Николая Недоброво","authors":"Роман Мних (Roman Mnich)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article analyzes the intertextuality and motifs of the tragedies <em>Laodamia</em> by Innokenty Annensky and <em>Judith</em> by Nikolai Nedobrovo. These works reflect the main trends of Russian modernism: the interpretation of the world and European cultural heritage through Greek mythology and the Bible. <em>Laodamia</em> and <em>Judith</em> illustrate two different ways a classical text was received in the culture of the Silver Age: Nedobrovo’s reception is determined by the classicist tradition, Annensky’s reception – by romanticism. The analyzed tragedies are united by a system of motifs and images. The siege of the biblical Bethulia recalls the siege of Troy, and the image of a widow meeting not her husband, but “someone else”, is central to both plots – while Judith meets the shadow of her husband (statue) or enemy, she, like Laodamia, spends the night “not with him”. Annensky and Nedobrovo did not formally belong to the acmeist movement, but they both influenced the acmeists’ intertextual poetics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the intertextuality and motifs of the tragedies Laodamia by Innokenty Annensky and Judith by Nikolai Nedobrovo. These works reflect the main trends of Russian modernism: the interpretation of the world and European cultural heritage through Greek mythology and the Bible. Laodamia and Judith illustrate two different ways a classical text was received in the culture of the Silver Age: Nedobrovo’s reception is determined by the classicist tradition, Annensky’s reception – by romanticism. The analyzed tragedies are united by a system of motifs and images. The siege of the biblical Bethulia recalls the siege of Troy, and the image of a widow meeting not her husband, but “someone else”, is central to both plots – while Judith meets the shadow of her husband (statue) or enemy, she, like Laodamia, spends the night “not with him”. Annensky and Nedobrovo did not formally belong to the acmeist movement, but they both influenced the acmeists’ intertextual poetics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非阿克梅主义悲剧:安纳斯基的无辜的老挝人和尼古拉涅德沃的朱迪思
本文分析了因诺肯季·安嫩斯基的悲剧《老达米亚》和尼古拉·涅多布罗沃的悲剧《朱迪思》的互文性和母题。这些作品反映了俄罗斯现代主义的主要趋势:通过希腊神话和圣经来解释世界和欧洲文化遗产。劳达米亚和朱迪思说明了在白银时代文化中古典文本被接受的两种不同方式:涅多布罗沃的接受是由古典主义传统决定的,安涅斯基的接受是由浪漫主义决定的。所分析的悲剧是由一系列的母题和形象统一起来的。《圣经》中的贝特利亚之围让人想起特洛伊之围,而一个寡妇遇到的不是她的丈夫,而是“别人”的形象,是两个情节的中心——当朱迪思遇到她丈夫的影子(雕像)或敌人时,她像老达米亚一样,“没有和他在一起”过夜。安涅斯基和涅多布罗沃在形式上并不属于阿希姆主义运动,但他们都影响了阿希姆主义者的互文诗学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board В поисках симметрии. Андрей Битов и его последний роман Rebellion Against the Church in the Name of Christ – Nikolai Leskov’s Rebel Priests and Russian Cultural Tradition «Навь и явь» в «Дневнике мыслей» Алексея Ремизова. Январь – февраль 1953 г. Review Article: New Russian Literary History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1