Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers for allograft injury after solid organ transplantation: current state-of-the-art

IF 0.1 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION Transplant Research and Risk Management Pub Date : 2019-06-27 DOI:10.2147/TRRM.S204233
S. Pattar, S. Greenway
{"title":"Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers for allograft injury after solid organ transplantation: current state-of-the-art","authors":"S. Pattar, S. Greenway","doi":"10.2147/TRRM.S204233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sabrina K Pattar Steven C Greenway 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Department of Pediatrics and Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 3Department of Cardiac Sciences and Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Abstract: Immune-mediated injury of a transplanted organ can lead to allograft dysfunction and even patient death. Acute cellular rejection typically occurs within the first months post-transplantation but patients are at life-time risk, particularly if there is medication non-compliance or reduction of immunosuppression due to complications. Therefore, safe and accurate monitoring of the donated organ for signs of rejection is essential for long-term survival of the transplanted organ and recipient. The current gold standard for rejection surveillance is through tissue biopsy and histology, which is costly, invasive, and subjective. Thus, efforts to develop non-invasive methods for the detection of rejection post-transplantation are a priority in the field. The first FDA-approved noninvasive assay, AlloMap, was developed in 2006 and monitored the peripheral expression of 11 genes associated with immune system activation. More recently, there has been a shift towards interrogating the status of the transplanted organ directly. Fragments of genomic DNA are released into the blood during cellular apoptosis and levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been shown to be elevated in the presence of organ injury, including after transplantation. Since the genomic characteristics of DNA are maintained in cfDNA (eg, sequence variants), this circulating molecule represents a promising organ-specific biomarker for allograft injury. DNA sequence variants have been used to distinguish donor and recipient cfDNA with or without a priori donor genotyping in a variety of solid organs post-transplant. Current research has established the groundwork and future multicenter trials will determine if this novel molecular diagnostic tool represents a viable alternative to tissue biopsy. Other nucleic acid molecules released from the transplanted organ (eg, microRNAs) are presently less well developed in comparison to cfDNA but may also represent potential novel biomarkers. This review summarizes current literature and evaluates the promises and pitfalls of circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers for allograft injury post-transplant.","PeriodicalId":41597,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Research and Risk Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TRRM.S204233","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Research and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TRRM.S204233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Sabrina K Pattar Steven C Greenway 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Department of Pediatrics and Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 3Department of Cardiac Sciences and Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Abstract: Immune-mediated injury of a transplanted organ can lead to allograft dysfunction and even patient death. Acute cellular rejection typically occurs within the first months post-transplantation but patients are at life-time risk, particularly if there is medication non-compliance or reduction of immunosuppression due to complications. Therefore, safe and accurate monitoring of the donated organ for signs of rejection is essential for long-term survival of the transplanted organ and recipient. The current gold standard for rejection surveillance is through tissue biopsy and histology, which is costly, invasive, and subjective. Thus, efforts to develop non-invasive methods for the detection of rejection post-transplantation are a priority in the field. The first FDA-approved noninvasive assay, AlloMap, was developed in 2006 and monitored the peripheral expression of 11 genes associated with immune system activation. More recently, there has been a shift towards interrogating the status of the transplanted organ directly. Fragments of genomic DNA are released into the blood during cellular apoptosis and levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been shown to be elevated in the presence of organ injury, including after transplantation. Since the genomic characteristics of DNA are maintained in cfDNA (eg, sequence variants), this circulating molecule represents a promising organ-specific biomarker for allograft injury. DNA sequence variants have been used to distinguish donor and recipient cfDNA with or without a priori donor genotyping in a variety of solid organs post-transplant. Current research has established the groundwork and future multicenter trials will determine if this novel molecular diagnostic tool represents a viable alternative to tissue biopsy. Other nucleic acid molecules released from the transplanted organ (eg, microRNAs) are presently less well developed in comparison to cfDNA but may also represent potential novel biomarkers. This review summarizes current literature and evaluates the promises and pitfalls of circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers for allograft injury post-transplant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环核酸作为实体器官移植后同种异体移植物损伤的生物标志物:最新进展
Sabrina K Pattar Steven C Greenway 1加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市卡尔加里大学卡明医学院生物化学和分子生物学系;2加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市卡尔加里大学卡明医学院儿科和阿尔伯塔儿童医院研究所;3加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市卡尔加里大学卡明医学院心脏科学系和阿尔伯塔省利宾心血管研究所摘要:移植器官的免疫介导损伤可导致移植物功能障碍,甚至导致患者死亡。急性细胞排斥反应通常发生在移植后的头几个月内,但患者面临终身风险,特别是如果出现药物不依从性或并发症导致免疫抑制减少的情况。因此,安全准确地监测捐赠器官的排斥反应迹象对于移植器官和接受者的长期生存至关重要。目前排异监测的金标准是通过组织活检和组织学,这是昂贵的、侵入性的和主观的。因此,开发用于检测移植后排斥反应的非侵入性方法是该领域的优先事项。美国食品药品监督管理局批准的第一种非侵入性检测方法AlloMap于2006年开发,监测了11个与免疫系统激活相关的基因的外周表达。最近,人们开始转向直接询问移植器官的状况。在细胞凋亡过程中,基因组DNA片段被释放到血液中,并且无细胞DNA(cfDNA)水平已被证明在器官损伤的情况下(包括移植后)会升高。由于cfDNA中保持着DNA的基因组特征(如序列变体),这种循环分子代表了一种很有前途的移植物损伤器官特异性生物标志物。DNA序列变体已被用于区分移植后各种实体器官中具有或不具有先验供体基因分型的供体和受体cfDNA。目前的研究已经奠定了基础,未来的多中心试验将确定这种新型分子诊断工具是否是组织活检的可行替代品。与cfDNA相比,从移植器官释放的其他核酸分子(如微小RNA)目前发育不太好,但也可能代表潜在的新生物标志物。这篇综述总结了目前的文献,并评估了循环核酸作为移植后同种异体移植物损伤的生物标志物的前景和陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tacrolimus Trough Level Variation and Its Correlation to Clinical Outcomes and Consequences in Solid Organ Transplantation Kidney Transplant Recipients with JC Virus Infection Have Decreased Function of the Transplanted Kidney A Unique Case of Tacrolimus-Induced Dysphagia and Dysarthria in the Absence of Diagnostic Findings Predictive Value of Delayed Graft Function Definitions Following Donation After Circulatory Death Renal Transplantation in the United Kingdom Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplantation, Retrospective Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1