The Effect of WTO Membership on Service Sector Trade Liberalization

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of International Logistics and Trade Pub Date : 2022-02-16 DOI:10.24006/jilt.2022.e2
Chase Englund
{"title":"The Effect of WTO Membership on Service Sector Trade Liberalization","authors":"Chase Englund","doi":"10.24006/jilt.2022.e2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large portion of labor and trade in most countries is devoted to the service sector, and thus service sector impacts are crucial to a full understanding of the effects of WTO membership. The effect of WTO membership on trade volume has been subject to debate in the past, but critically, these studies have failed to examine service sector trade specifically. Conventional wisdom would seem to suggest that WTO membership should have boosted services trade, particularly after the implementation of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) in 1995. However, the relationship has yet to be rigorously tested. Here, I use data comprising 178 countries across a span ranging from 1995 until 2015 to examine the impact that WTO membership, and specifically WTO accession, has had on service sector trade levels relative to goods trade levels after the adoption of GATS. Statistical tests yield weak evidence for any significant relationship between WTO membership and service sector trade, with some possible exceptions for states that underwent many rounds of negotiations. This exception is explored further through a comparison of the WTO accessions of China and Vietnam. However, even in these extreme cases, it is difficult to find clear evidence of service sector liberalization. Overall, the findings imply that, in almost all cases, WTO rules and accessions have underemphasized service sector trade in favor of agricultural and goods trade, generating lopsided impacts to trade efficiency.","PeriodicalId":36581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2022.e2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large portion of labor and trade in most countries is devoted to the service sector, and thus service sector impacts are crucial to a full understanding of the effects of WTO membership. The effect of WTO membership on trade volume has been subject to debate in the past, but critically, these studies have failed to examine service sector trade specifically. Conventional wisdom would seem to suggest that WTO membership should have boosted services trade, particularly after the implementation of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) in 1995. However, the relationship has yet to be rigorously tested. Here, I use data comprising 178 countries across a span ranging from 1995 until 2015 to examine the impact that WTO membership, and specifically WTO accession, has had on service sector trade levels relative to goods trade levels after the adoption of GATS. Statistical tests yield weak evidence for any significant relationship between WTO membership and service sector trade, with some possible exceptions for states that underwent many rounds of negotiations. This exception is explored further through a comparison of the WTO accessions of China and Vietnam. However, even in these extreme cases, it is difficult to find clear evidence of service sector liberalization. Overall, the findings imply that, in almost all cases, WTO rules and accessions have underemphasized service sector trade in favor of agricultural and goods trade, generating lopsided impacts to trade efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加入WTO对服务业贸易自由化的影响
大多数国家的大部分劳动力和贸易都致力于服务业,因此服务业的影响对于充分理解加入世贸组织的影响至关重要。加入世贸组织对贸易量的影响过去一直存在争议,但至关重要的是,这些研究未能具体研究服务业贸易。传统观点似乎认为,加入世贸组织本应促进服务贸易,特别是在1995年实施《服务贸易总协定》之后。然而,这种关系尚待严格检验。在这里,我使用了涵盖1995年至2015年期间178个国家的数据,来研究加入世贸组织,特别是加入世贸组织,对服贸总协定通过后服务业贸易水平相对于商品贸易水平的影响。统计测试得出的证据不足以证明世贸组织成员资格与服务业贸易之间存在任何重大关系,但经历了多轮谈判的国家可能会有一些例外。通过对中国和越南加入世贸组织的比较,进一步探讨了这一例外情况。然而,即使在这些极端情况下,也很难找到服务部门自由化的明确证据。总体而言,调查结果表明,在几乎所有情况下,世贸组织规则和加入都低估了服务业贸易的重要性,有利于农业和货物贸易,对贸易效率产生了不平衡的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
Journal of International Logistics and Trade Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The mediating effect of eco-innovation on low-carbon supply chain practices toward manufacturing firm performance in Malaysia Global logistics and supply chain integration in the digital era: a focus on China's Belt and Road Initiative Main contents and implications of the 2023 revision of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises* Impact of the chips act on the GVC participation of China's electronics industry A conceptual framework of green supply chain integration toward enterprise performance through ambidextrous green innovation: an organizational capability perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1