Writing Precarity: Neoliberalism and the Globalized Atlantic

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.3368/cl.62.1.130
N. Islam
{"title":"Writing Precarity: Neoliberalism and the Globalized Atlantic","authors":"N. Islam","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.1.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"62 1","pages":"130 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.1.130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

n a 2019 issue of South Atlantic Quarterly titled “Neoliberalism’s Authoritarian (Re)turns,” editors Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore question the usefulness of the term neoliberalism to describe our contemporary moment marked by “the tawdry array of authoritarian (re)turns that have been witnessed in various parts of the world in the decade since the global financial crisis of 2008―from Trump to Turkey, from the Brexit debacle to the Brazilian coup, and much else besides.”1 This is but one example of contemporary skepticism toward the idea of neoliberalism, especially what it means, how it is used as an idea and a practice in different ways across global contexts, and what processes it cannot adequately account for. However, even as scholars acknowledge that the meaning of neoliberalism is not always readily apparent, they remain invested in understanding its influence on the cultural sphere. Literary scholarship in this area has sought to demonstrate how neoliberalism influences not only literary form and representation, but also shifts in method and genre such as the resurgence of realism and the memoir’s rise to prominence.2 Recent work has also
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写作的不稳定性:新自由主义与全球化的大西洋
在《南大西洋季刊》2019年的一期题为“新自由主义的威权主义(再)转向”的文章中,编辑Jamie Peck和Nik Theodore质疑新自由主义一词是否有助于描述我们当代的一个时刻,其标志是“一系列低俗的威权(再)自2008年全球金融危机以来的十年里,世界各地都发生了转折——从特朗普到土耳其,从英国脱欧到巴西政变,以及其他许多事情。”1这只是当代对新自由主义思想持怀疑态度的一个例子,尤其是它的含义,它如何在全球背景下以不同的方式被用作一种思想和实践,以及它无法充分解释什么过程。然而,尽管学者们承认新自由主义的含义并不总是显而易见的,但他们仍然致力于理解它对文化领域的影响。这一领域的文学学术试图证明新自由主义不仅影响文学形式和表现,而且影响方法和流派的转变,如现实主义的复兴和回忆录的崛起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Literature publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. CL published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; we also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J.M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, CL features the full diversity of critical practices.
期刊最新文献
What Lyric Is Missing: Anne Carson and the Contemporary Fragment Sally Rooney’s Sapiosexuals Race by Analogy? Omar El Akkad’s American Wars The Banality of Exception My Mother, My Self: Coming of Age on the Road in Sara Taylor’sThe Lauras
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1