The Contortions and Convolutions of the “Speculative Turn”

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1353/dia.2021.0005
Thomas Sutherland
{"title":"The Contortions and Convolutions of the “Speculative Turn”","authors":"Thomas Sutherland","doi":"10.1353/dia.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Focusing principally on the once-feted philosophical movement of object-oriented ontology (OOO), this article examines how this movement fits into a broader “speculative turn,” which seeks to reverse the purportedly wrongheaded emphasis of post-Kantian critical philosophy on the finitude of the subject, and once again unleash the fecund potentialities of speculative thought. Identifying several incongruities and tensions that traverse this project, it is argued that OOO exemplifies the difficulties faced when attempting to articulate a decidedly pre-critical metaphysics without accounting for the question of subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":"49 1","pages":"108 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2021.0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Focusing principally on the once-feted philosophical movement of object-oriented ontology (OOO), this article examines how this movement fits into a broader “speculative turn,” which seeks to reverse the purportedly wrongheaded emphasis of post-Kantian critical philosophy on the finitude of the subject, and once again unleash the fecund potentialities of speculative thought. Identifying several incongruities and tensions that traverse this project, it is argued that OOO exemplifies the difficulties faced when attempting to articulate a decidedly pre-critical metaphysics without accounting for the question of subjectivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“思辨转向”的起伏与卷积
摘要:本文主要关注一度备受推崇的面向对象本体论哲学运动,探讨这一运动如何融入更广泛的“思辨转向”,试图扭转后康德批判哲学对主体有限性的错误强调,再次释放思辨思维的巨大潜力。通过识别贯穿该项目的几个不协调和紧张关系,有人认为OOO体现了在不考虑主观性问题的情况下,试图阐明一种明确的批判前形而上学所面临的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
期刊最新文献
Heidegger Tonight: A Philosophical Dialogue Fascination With The Obscure: An Interview With Peter Trawny Rethinking Authenticity, Anarchy, and Collective Action: An Interview with Peg Birmingham Object-Oriented Heidegger: An Interview with Graham Harman Crossroads in the Flesh: An Interview with Mariana Ortega
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1