Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Post-Communist Economies Pub Date : 2021-08-14 DOI:10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928
M. Misic, Anastassia V. Obydenkova
{"title":"Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia","authors":"M. Misic, Anastassia V. Obydenkova","doi":"10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Small hydropower plants (SHPs), despite being a renewable energy source, could have negative environmental effects. Nonetheless, many countries have promoted and subsidised them, leading to a rise in the number of environmental conflicts. How was the issue of SHPs framed in Serbia by the proponents and the opponents? How did the framing strategy change over time and why? And which factors increased attention to the topic, eventually leading a change of governmental policy? To address these questions, we analyse the Serbian mass media’s environmental framing of SHPs and conduct a content analysis of 359 articles written between 2000–2020 and published by major national online newspapers and news portals. We use the Discourse Network Analyser to demonstrate changes in framing strategies that, together with increased public pressure, contributed to a re-evaluation of the impact of SHPs and ultimately changed the government’s and the public’s standing on this issue.","PeriodicalId":46517,"journal":{"name":"Post-Communist Economies","volume":"34 1","pages":"684 - 713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Communist Economies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

ABSTRACT Small hydropower plants (SHPs), despite being a renewable energy source, could have negative environmental effects. Nonetheless, many countries have promoted and subsidised them, leading to a rise in the number of environmental conflicts. How was the issue of SHPs framed in Serbia by the proponents and the opponents? How did the framing strategy change over time and why? And which factors increased attention to the topic, eventually leading a change of governmental policy? To address these questions, we analyse the Serbian mass media’s environmental framing of SHPs and conduct a content analysis of 359 articles written between 2000–2020 and published by major national online newspapers and news portals. We use the Discourse Network Analyser to demonstrate changes in framing strategies that, together with increased public pressure, contributed to a re-evaluation of the impact of SHPs and ultimately changed the government’s and the public’s standing on this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境冲突、可再生能源,还是两者兼而有之?塞尔维亚小型水电站公众舆论
摘要小型水电站虽然是一种可再生能源,但可能会对环境产生负面影响。尽管如此,许多国家还是对其进行了推广和补贴,导致环境冲突的数量增加。支持者和反对者是如何在塞尔维亚提出SHP问题的?框架策略是如何随着时间的推移而变化的,为什么?哪些因素增加了人们对这个话题的关注,最终导致了政府政策的改变?为了解决这些问题,我们分析了塞尔维亚大众媒体对SHP的环境框架,并对2000年至2020年间撰写并由主要国家在线报纸和新闻门户网站发表的359篇文章进行了内容分析。我们使用话语网络分析器来展示框架策略的变化,加上公众压力的增加,有助于重新评估SHP的影响,并最终改变政府和公众在这个问题上的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Post-Communist Economies publishes key research and policy articles in the analysis of post-communist economies. The basic transformation in the past two decades through stabilisation, liberalisation and privatisation has been completed in virtually all of the former communist countries, but despite the dramatic changes that have taken place, the post-communist economies still form a clearly identifiable group, distinguished by the impact of the years of communist rule. Post-communist economies still present distinctive problems that make them a particular focus of research.
期刊最新文献
European integration and economic growth in emerging Europe: the role of institutions and policy factors External debt burden and economic growth: evidence from Central Asia The impact of special economic zones on industrial enterprises’ productivity in Russia Does one good turn deserve another? Evidence from China’s trade and aid policy Can SEE economies grow stronger together? Empirical evidence from the CEFTA region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1