{"title":"Beyond Understanding","authors":"Rohan Ghatage","doi":"10.7227/jbr.5.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay establishes a philosophical connection between James Baldwin and the\n philosopher William James by investigating how the pragmatist protocol against\n “vicious intellectualism” offers Baldwin a key resource for\n thinking through how anti-black racism might be dismantled. While Richard Wright\n had earlier denounced pragmatism for privileging experience over knowledge, and\n thereby offering the black subject no means for redressing America’s\n constitutive hierarchies, uncovering the current of Jamesian thought that runs\n through Baldwin’s essays brings into view his attempt to move beyond\n epistemology as the primary framework for inaugurating a future unburdened by\n the problem of the color line. Although Baldwin indicts contemporaneous\n arrangements of knowledge for producing the most dehumanizing forms of racism,\n he does not simply attempt to rewrite the enervating meanings to which black\n subjects are given. Articulating a pragmatist sensibility at various stages of\n his career, Baldwin repeatedly suggests that the imagining and creation of a\n better world is predicated upon rethinking the normative value accorded to\n knowledge in the practice of politics. The provocative challenge that Baldwin\n issues for his reader is to cease the well-established privileging of knowledge,\n and to instead stage the struggle for freedom within an aesthetic, rather than\n epistemological, paradigm.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
This essay establishes a philosophical connection between James Baldwin and the
philosopher William James by investigating how the pragmatist protocol against
“vicious intellectualism” offers Baldwin a key resource for
thinking through how anti-black racism might be dismantled. While Richard Wright
had earlier denounced pragmatism for privileging experience over knowledge, and
thereby offering the black subject no means for redressing America’s
constitutive hierarchies, uncovering the current of Jamesian thought that runs
through Baldwin’s essays brings into view his attempt to move beyond
epistemology as the primary framework for inaugurating a future unburdened by
the problem of the color line. Although Baldwin indicts contemporaneous
arrangements of knowledge for producing the most dehumanizing forms of racism,
he does not simply attempt to rewrite the enervating meanings to which black
subjects are given. Articulating a pragmatist sensibility at various stages of
his career, Baldwin repeatedly suggests that the imagining and creation of a
better world is predicated upon rethinking the normative value accorded to
knowledge in the practice of politics. The provocative challenge that Baldwin
issues for his reader is to cease the well-established privileging of knowledge,
and to instead stage the struggle for freedom within an aesthetic, rather than
epistemological, paradigm.