Responsible autonomy: The interplay of autonomy, control and trust for knowledge professionals working remotely during COVID-19

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Economic and Industrial Democracy Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1177/0143831X221140156
Neve Abgeller, R. Bachmann, T. Dobbins, Deirdre Anderson
{"title":"Responsible autonomy: The interplay of autonomy, control and trust for knowledge professionals working remotely during COVID-19","authors":"Neve Abgeller, R. Bachmann, T. Dobbins, Deirdre Anderson","doi":"10.1177/0143831X221140156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits the concept of responsible autonomy, analysing the interplay of employee autonomy, management control and trust experienced by knowledge professionals in the UK compelled to work remotely during the coronavirus pandemic. The authors theorise about the tensions and paradoxes of responsible autonomy in the contemporary context of the COVID-19 crisis, drawing on empirical findings gathered in May 2020 and May 2021. Many participants experienced increased autonomy and discretion, but also work intensification and blurred work–life boundaries. Interestingly, many accepted this paradox as a palatable trade-off for the autonomy of being able to work from home, particularly where there was reciprocal trust between employee and manager. Trust is the glue in responsible autonomy, yet exists in tension with intrusive managerial control.","PeriodicalId":47456,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X221140156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article revisits the concept of responsible autonomy, analysing the interplay of employee autonomy, management control and trust experienced by knowledge professionals in the UK compelled to work remotely during the coronavirus pandemic. The authors theorise about the tensions and paradoxes of responsible autonomy in the contemporary context of the COVID-19 crisis, drawing on empirical findings gathered in May 2020 and May 2021. Many participants experienced increased autonomy and discretion, but also work intensification and blurred work–life boundaries. Interestingly, many accepted this paradox as a palatable trade-off for the autonomy of being able to work from home, particularly where there was reciprocal trust between employee and manager. Trust is the glue in responsible autonomy, yet exists in tension with intrusive managerial control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负责任的自主:新冠肺炎期间远程工作的知识专业人员的自主、控制和信任的相互作用
这篇文章重新审视了负责任的自主性的概念,分析了在冠状病毒大流行期间被迫远程工作的英国知识专业人员所经历的员工自主性、管理控制和信任之间的相互作用。作者根据2020年5月和2021年5月收集的实证结果,对新冠肺炎危机当代背景下负责任自主的紧张关系和悖论进行了理论分析。许多参与者经历了自主性和自由裁量权的增强,但也经历了工作的强化和工作与生活界限的模糊。有趣的是,许多人认为这种悖论是在家工作的自主权的一种可以接受的权衡,尤其是在员工和经理之间相互信任的情况下。信任是负责任自治的粘合剂,但与侵入性管理控制存在紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Economic and Industrial Democracy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Economic and Industrial Democracy is an international peer reviewed journal that focuses on the study of initiatives designed to enhance the quality of working life through extending the democratic control of workers over the workplace and the economy. How those initiatives are affected by wider political, economic and technological factors are also of interest. Special emphasis is laid on international coverage of empirical material, including discussions of the social and economic conditions in various countries.
期刊最新文献
The employee representation plan movement in the United States 1913–1935: The attempted legitimation of novel organizational forms Neoliberalism by stealth? Labour reforms and institutional discontinuity in worker representation in France Crafting alternative work organisations: Paradoxes of workplace democracy and emancipation in worker-buyout cooperatives The union default: Increasing union membership by facilitating the experience of unionism and overcoming the role of inertia Elucidating the relationship between high-investment HR systems and workforce engagement: The role of employee education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1