Dyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient-caregiver interventions and effects.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2023-004430
Xiaohang Liu, Tongyao Wang, Denise Shuk Ting Cheung, Pui Hing Chau, Mu-Hsing Ho, Yuanxia Han, Chia-Chin Lin
{"title":"Dyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient-caregiver interventions and effects.","authors":"Xiaohang Liu, Tongyao Wang, Denise Shuk Ting Cheung, Pui Hing Chau, Mu-Hsing Ho, Yuanxia Han, Chia-Chin Lin","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-004430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family caregiver's involvement in advance care planning (ACP) is essential to provide high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care and to ease the surrogate decision-making burden. However, no systematic review has focused on existing ACP interventions involving patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically summarise current ACP interventions involving patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five English and two Chinese databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The eligible studies were experimental studies describing original data. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools assessed the methodological quality. Narrative synthesis was conducted for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, twenty-eight articles were included. Fifteen studies were randomised controlled trials, and the rest 13 studies were quasi-experimental studies. The data synthesis identified: (1) Key intervention components: strategies to promote ACP, ACP discussion and follow-up, as well as the role of family caregivers; (2) Effects on intended outcomes: interventions have shown benefit on completion of ACP actions, while inconsistent findings were found on the process outcomes and quality of EOL care. In addition, a logic model for patient-caregiver dyadic ACP was created, and the underlying mechanisms of action included well-preparation, open discussion and adequate support for plan/action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides comprehensive evidence about patient-caregiver dyadic ACP, a promising intervention to better prepare for EOL communication and decision-making. A logic model has been mapped to give a preliminary indication for future implementation. More empirical studies are needed to improve this model and culturally adapt it in a real-world setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family caregiver's involvement in advance care planning (ACP) is essential to provide high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care and to ease the surrogate decision-making burden. However, no systematic review has focused on existing ACP interventions involving patients and their families.

Aim: To systematically summarise current ACP interventions involving patients and their families.

Methods: Five English and two Chinese databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The eligible studies were experimental studies describing original data. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools assessed the methodological quality. Narrative synthesis was conducted for data analysis.

Results: In total, twenty-eight articles were included. Fifteen studies were randomised controlled trials, and the rest 13 studies were quasi-experimental studies. The data synthesis identified: (1) Key intervention components: strategies to promote ACP, ACP discussion and follow-up, as well as the role of family caregivers; (2) Effects on intended outcomes: interventions have shown benefit on completion of ACP actions, while inconsistent findings were found on the process outcomes and quality of EOL care. In addition, a logic model for patient-caregiver dyadic ACP was created, and the underlying mechanisms of action included well-preparation, open discussion and adequate support for plan/action.

Conclusions: This review provides comprehensive evidence about patient-caregiver dyadic ACP, a promising intervention to better prepare for EOL communication and decision-making. A logic model has been mapped to give a preliminary indication for future implementation. More empirical studies are needed to improve this model and culturally adapt it in a real-world setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dyadic预先护理计划:对患者护理干预措施和效果的系统审查。
家庭登记者参与提前护理计划(ACP)对于提供高质量的临终关怀(EOL)和减轻替代决策负担至关重要。然而,尚未对涉及患者及其家属的现有ACP干预措施进行系统审查。本研究的目的是系统总结目前涉及患者及其家属的ACP干预措施。从成立到2022年9月,共检索了五个英文数据库和两个中文数据库。符合条件的研究是描述原始数据的实验研究。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具评估了方法论的质量。叙述性综合用于数据分析。总共收录了28篇文章。15项研究为随机对照试验,其余13项研究为准实验研究。数据综合确定:(1)关键干预组成部分:促进ACP的策略、ACP讨论和随访,以及家庭护理人员的作用;(2)对预期结果的影响:干预措施对完成ACP行动显示出益处,而对EOL护理的过程结果和质量发现不一致。此外,还建立了患者-护理者二元ACP的逻辑模型,其潜在的行动机制包括充分的准备、公开的讨论和对计划/行动的充分支持。本综述提供了关于患者-护理人员二元ACP的全面证据,这是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以更好地为EOL沟通和决策做好准备。已经映射了一个逻辑模型,为未来的实施提供了初步指示。需要更多的实证研究来改进这种模式,并在现实世界中对其进行文化调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Physical and emotional status, quality of life and activities of daily living in terminal cancer: prospective cohort study. Digital health for cancer symptom management in palliative medicine: systematic review. Tongue pressure, respiratory muscle and limb strength and functional exercise capacity in oesophageal cancer. End-of-life preferences of people with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Spiritual assessment in palliative care: multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1