Fluoride Exposure and Skeletal Fluorosis: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Current Environmental Health Reports Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1007/s40572-023-00412-9
Federica Veneri, Inga Iamandii, Marco Vinceti, Linda S Birnbaum, Luigi Generali, Ugo Consolo, Tommaso Filippini
{"title":"Fluoride Exposure and Skeletal Fluorosis: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.","authors":"Federica Veneri, Inga Iamandii, Marco Vinceti, Linda S Birnbaum, Luigi Generali, Ugo Consolo, Tommaso Filippini","doi":"10.1007/s40572-023-00412-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relation between fluoride exposure and skeletal fluorosis (SF) using a novel statistical methodology for dose-response modeling.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Skeletal fluorosis, a major health issue that is endemic in some regions, affects millions of people worldwide. However, data regarding the dose-response relation between fluoride exposure and SF are limited and outdated. We included twenty-three studies in the meta-analysis. When comparing the highest versus the lowest fluoride category, the summary risk ratio (RR) for SF prevalence was 2.05 (95% CI 1.60; 2.64), with a value of 2.73 (95% CI 1.92; 3.90) for drinking water and 1.40 (95% CI 0.90; 2.17) for urinary fluoride. The RR by the risk of bias (RoB) was 2.37 (95% CI 1.56; 3.58) and 1.78 (95% CI 1.34; 2.36) for moderate and high RoB studies, respectively. The dose-response curve based on a one-stage cubic spline regression model showed an almost linear positive relation between exposure and SF occurrence starting from relatively low concentrations up to 5 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L, respectively, for water and urinary fluoride, with no substantial increase above this threshold. The RR for developing moderate-severe forms increases at 5.00 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L of water and urinary fluoride, respectively. Better-quality studies are needed to confirm these results, but greater attention should be given to water fluoride levels to prevent SF, in addition to the other potential adverse effects of fluoride exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10775,"journal":{"name":"Current Environmental Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"417-441"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Environmental Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-023-00412-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relation between fluoride exposure and skeletal fluorosis (SF) using a novel statistical methodology for dose-response modeling.

Recent findings: Skeletal fluorosis, a major health issue that is endemic in some regions, affects millions of people worldwide. However, data regarding the dose-response relation between fluoride exposure and SF are limited and outdated. We included twenty-three studies in the meta-analysis. When comparing the highest versus the lowest fluoride category, the summary risk ratio (RR) for SF prevalence was 2.05 (95% CI 1.60; 2.64), with a value of 2.73 (95% CI 1.92; 3.90) for drinking water and 1.40 (95% CI 0.90; 2.17) for urinary fluoride. The RR by the risk of bias (RoB) was 2.37 (95% CI 1.56; 3.58) and 1.78 (95% CI 1.34; 2.36) for moderate and high RoB studies, respectively. The dose-response curve based on a one-stage cubic spline regression model showed an almost linear positive relation between exposure and SF occurrence starting from relatively low concentrations up to 5 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L, respectively, for water and urinary fluoride, with no substantial increase above this threshold. The RR for developing moderate-severe forms increases at 5.00 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L of water and urinary fluoride, respectively. Better-quality studies are needed to confirm these results, but greater attention should be given to water fluoride levels to prevent SF, in addition to the other potential adverse effects of fluoride exposure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氟暴露与骨骼氟中毒:系统综述和剂量反应荟萃分析。
综述目的:我们使用一种新的剂量反应模型统计方法,对氟暴露与氟骨症(SF)之间的关系进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。最近的发现:氟骨症是一个主要的健康问题,在一些地区流行,影响着全世界数百万人。然而,关于氟暴露与SF之间的剂量反应关系的数据是有限的,并且已经过时。我们在荟萃分析中纳入了23项研究。当比较最高和最低氟化物类别时,SF患病率的总风险比(RR)为2.05(95%CI 1.60;2.64),饮用水为2.73(95%CI 1.92;3.90),尿氟为1.40(95%CI 0.90;2.17)。中度和高RoB研究的偏倚风险RR分别为2.37(95%CI 1.56;3.58)和1.78(95%CI 1.34;2.36)。基于一阶段三次样条回归模型的剂量-反应曲线显示,从水和尿氟的相对低浓度(分别高达5mg/L和2.5mg/L)开始,暴露和SF发生之间几乎呈线性正相关,在该阈值以上没有显著增加。当水和尿氟浓度分别为5.00 mg/L和2.5 mg/L时,发展为中重度的RR会增加。需要更高质量的研究来证实这些结果,但除了氟化物暴露的其他潜在不良影响外,还应更多地关注水的氟化物水平,以预防SF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.30%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Current Environmental Health Reports provides up-to-date expert reviews in environmental health. The goal is to evaluate and synthesize original research in all disciplines relevant for environmental health sciences, including basic research, clinical research, epidemiology, and environmental policy.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Tear Fluid as a Matrix for Biomonitoring Environmental and Chemical Exposures. A Review of Urban Planning Approaches to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures. Toxic Metals and Metalloids in Food: Current Status, Health Risks, and Mitigation Strategies. Using Geovisualizations to Educate the Public About Environmental Health Hazards: What Works and Why. Carcinogenic Mechanisms of Hexavalent Chromium: From DNA Breaks to Chromosome Instability and Neoplastic Transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1