Radiofrequency ablation for thyroid Bethesda III nodules: preliminary results.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM European Thyroid Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-09 Print Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1530/ETJ-23-0105
Pi-Ling Chiang, Sheng-Dean Luo, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Chen-Kai Chou, Shun-Yu Chi, Yi-Fan Chen, Wei-Che Lin
{"title":"Radiofrequency ablation for thyroid Bethesda III nodules: preliminary results.","authors":"Pi-Ling Chiang, Sheng-Dean Luo, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Chen-Kai Chou, Shun-Yu Chi, Yi-Fan Chen, Wei-Che Lin","doi":"10.1530/ETJ-23-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for thyroid nodules with cytological atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS, Bethesda III).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 28 adults presenting with 30 initial Bethesda III nodules underwent thyroid RFA at a single medical center. Thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV or V according to the second aspiration were excluded. All RFA procedures were performed using the free-hand, 'moving-shot' technique under local anesthesia. Clinical features and demographics, RFA details, nodule volume reduction rate (VRR), and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 47.6 years, 82.1% of whom were females. Mean nodule volumes at pre-RFA, and at 6 months and 12 months post-RFA were 7.92, 2.42, and 1.25 mL, respectively, with a VRR of 77.9% at 6 months, and 87.4% at 12 months. Post-RFA complications were noted in two patients, one with transient vocal cord palsy and another with isthmus minor rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFA may be another safe alternative except for active surveillance or surgical excision for AUS/FLUS nodules with low-suspicion Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System features for patients who are unsuitable or strongly refuse surgery. Long-term results remain uncertain, thus further follow-up study is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":12159,"journal":{"name":"European Thyroid Journal","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Thyroid Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-23-0105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for thyroid nodules with cytological atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS, Bethesda III).

Materials and methods: A total of 28 adults presenting with 30 initial Bethesda III nodules underwent thyroid RFA at a single medical center. Thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV or V according to the second aspiration were excluded. All RFA procedures were performed using the free-hand, 'moving-shot' technique under local anesthesia. Clinical features and demographics, RFA details, nodule volume reduction rate (VRR), and complications were analyzed.

Results: The mean age of patients was 47.6 years, 82.1% of whom were females. Mean nodule volumes at pre-RFA, and at 6 months and 12 months post-RFA were 7.92, 2.42, and 1.25 mL, respectively, with a VRR of 77.9% at 6 months, and 87.4% at 12 months. Post-RFA complications were noted in two patients, one with transient vocal cord palsy and another with isthmus minor rupture.

Conclusion: RFA may be another safe alternative except for active surveillance or surgical excision for AUS/FLUS nodules with low-suspicion Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System features for patients who are unsuitable or strongly refuse surgery. Long-term results remain uncertain, thus further follow-up study is necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺Bethesda III结节的射频消融:初步结果。
目的:本研究的目的是评估射频消融术(RFA)治疗甲状腺结节的可行性,这些结节具有不确定意义的细胞学异型性或不确定意义(AUS/FLUS,Bethesda III)的滤泡病变。根据第二次抽吸,排除Bethesda IV或V型甲状腺结节。所有RFA手术都是在局部麻醉下使用徒手“移动注射”技术进行的。分析了临床特征和人口统计学、RFA细节、结节体积缩小率(VRR)和并发症。结果:患者平均年龄47.6岁,其中女性占82.1%。RFA前、RFA后6个月和12个月的平均结节体积分别为7.92、2.42和1.25 mL,6个月时的VRR为77.9%,12个月时为87.4%。两名患者出现RFA后并发症,一名为短暂性声带麻痹,另一名为轻微峡部破裂。结论:对于不适合或强烈拒绝手术的患者,RFA可能是另一种安全的选择,除了对AUS/FLUS结节进行积极监测或手术切除外,该结节具有低怀疑甲状腺成像报告和数据系统功能。长期结果仍不确定,因此有必要进行进一步的随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Thyroid Journal
European Thyroid Journal Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: The ''European Thyroid Journal'' publishes papers reporting original research in basic, translational and clinical thyroidology. Original contributions cover all aspects of the field, from molecular and cellular biology to immunology and biochemistry, from physiology to pathology, and from pediatric to adult thyroid diseases with a special focus on thyroid cancer. Readers also benefit from reviews by noted experts, which highlight especially active areas of current research. The journal will further publish formal guidelines in the field, produced and endorsed by the European Thyroid Association.
期刊最新文献
Real word outcomes of cabozantinib therapy in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Toward a treatment for thyroid hormone transporter MCT8 deficiency - achievements and challenges. Effects of iodine contrast media on thyroid function - a prospective study. Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis - a retrospective study from Southern India. Graves' hyperthyroidism treated with potassium iodide: early response and after 2 years of follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1