Phase III, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With EGFR- or ALK-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ATTLAS, KCSG-LU19-04).
Sehhoon Park, Tae Min Kim, Ji-Youn Han, Gyeong-Won Lee, Byoung Yong Shim, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Sang-We Kim, Il Hwan Kim, Suee Lee, Yu Jung Kim, Ji Hyun Park, Sang-Gon Park, Ki Hyeong Lee, Eun Joo Kang, Ju Won Kim, Seong-Hoon Shin, Chan-Young Ock, Byung-Ho Nam, Jaebong Lee, Hyun-Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn
{"title":"Phase III, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With <i>EGFR</i>- or <i>ALK</i>-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ATTLAS, KCSG-LU19-04).","authors":"Sehhoon Park, Tae Min Kim, Ji-Youn Han, Gyeong-Won Lee, Byoung Yong Shim, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Sang-We Kim, Il Hwan Kim, Suee Lee, Yu Jung Kim, Ji Hyun Park, Sang-Gon Park, Ki Hyeong Lee, Eun Joo Kang, Ju Won Kim, Seong-Hoon Shin, Chan-Young Ock, Byung-Ho Nam, Jaebong Lee, Hyun-Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.01891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a driver mutation, the role of anti-PD-(L)1 antibody after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains unclear. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluates the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (ABCP ) in <i>EGFR-</i> or <i>ALK</i>-mutated NSCLC that progressed before TKI therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We compared the clinical efficacy of ABCP followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PC) followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 patients with activating <i>EGFR</i> mutation (n = 215) or <i>ALK</i> translocation (n = 13) were enrolled from 16 sites in the Republic of Korea and randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to either ABCP (n = 154) or PC arm (n = 74). The median follow-up duration was 26.1 months (95% CI, 24.7 to 28.2). Objective response rates (69.5% <i>v</i> 41.9%, <i>P</i> < .001) and median PFS (8.48 <i>v</i> 5.62 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.86]; <i>P</i> = .004) were significantly better in the ABCP than PC arm. PFS benefit increased as PD-L1 expression increased, with an HR of 0.47, 0.41, and 0.24 for PD-L1 ≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50%, respectively. Overall survival was similar between ABCP and PC arm (20.63 <i>v</i> 20.27 months, HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46]; <i>P</i> = .975). The safety profile of the ABCP arm was comparable with that previously reported, with no additional safety signals, but higher rates of treatment-related adverse events were observed compared with the PC arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this study is the first randomized phase III study to demonstrate the clinical benefit of anti-PD-L1 antibody in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with <i>EGFR-</i> or <i>ALK</i>-mutated NSCLC who have progressed on relevant targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1241-1251"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: In the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a driver mutation, the role of anti-PD-(L)1 antibody after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains unclear. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluates the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (ABCP ) in EGFR- or ALK-mutated NSCLC that progressed before TKI therapy.
Materials and methods: We compared the clinical efficacy of ABCP followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PC) followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results: A total of 228 patients with activating EGFR mutation (n = 215) or ALK translocation (n = 13) were enrolled from 16 sites in the Republic of Korea and randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to either ABCP (n = 154) or PC arm (n = 74). The median follow-up duration was 26.1 months (95% CI, 24.7 to 28.2). Objective response rates (69.5% v 41.9%, P < .001) and median PFS (8.48 v 5.62 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.86]; P = .004) were significantly better in the ABCP than PC arm. PFS benefit increased as PD-L1 expression increased, with an HR of 0.47, 0.41, and 0.24 for PD-L1 ≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50%, respectively. Overall survival was similar between ABCP and PC arm (20.63 v 20.27 months, HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46]; P = .975). The safety profile of the ABCP arm was comparable with that previously reported, with no additional safety signals, but higher rates of treatment-related adverse events were observed compared with the PC arm.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study is the first randomized phase III study to demonstrate the clinical benefit of anti-PD-L1 antibody in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with EGFR- or ALK-mutated NSCLC who have progressed on relevant targeted therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.