[Retrospective clinical-causal evaluation of a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients across the age spectrum in a primary care hospital].

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pneumologie Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2161-5866
Lea Madeleine Heiland, Rudolf Jörres, Sebastian Engelhardt, Peter Alter, Kathrin Kahnert, Jens Deerberg-Wittram, Thomas Unterweger, Stephan Budweiser
{"title":"[Retrospective clinical-causal evaluation of a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients across the age spectrum in a primary care hospital].","authors":"Lea Madeleine Heiland, Rudolf Jörres, Sebastian Engelhardt, Peter Alter, Kathrin Kahnert, Jens Deerberg-Wittram, Thomas Unterweger, Stephan Budweiser","doi":"10.1055/a-2161-5866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is often discussed that a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients may not be causally linked to the hospital stay, but no scientific data are available from Germany. Therefore, we analyzed to what extent a positive PCR test could be assessed as causal or secondary to admission according to clinical criteria in a tertiary care hospital of the first 4 months of 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SARS-CoV-2-positive patients of RoMed-Klinikum Rosenheim/Bavaria from 01/01/2022 to 30/04/2022 were included. Patients were divided into a group with COVID-19 as direct reason for admission (CAW), and a group, in which this did not apply according to a comprehensive clinical assessment (nCAW). Patients with no clear allocation to these groups were counted separately. Categorization was based on a multilevel procedure and performed by an internist experienced in COVD-19 (M.H.). It included all available clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings as well as treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>647 cases were included (age 10 days to 101 years, median 68 years; 49.5% women), including 13 patients in two admissions with positive PCR. 45.3% (n=293) were attributable to the group with COVID as the reason for admission, 48.8% (n=316) were not, no clear decision could be made in 35 patients, 3 patients were transferred from other clinics for isolation. In infants (up to 1 year), a positive PCR test was more frequently categorized as causative than in older patients. Leading symptoms of classification were found to be fatigue/fatigue, fever/chills, and cough on admission. Febrile convulsions accounted for the reason for admission in 10 cases of children (age 1.1-7.6 years). Length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (median (quartiles) 5 (2; 10) days for CAW, 5 (2; 12) for nCAW), nor did in-hospital mortality and median age of deceased or survivors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all clinical data revealed that positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR played a major and - according to clinical criteria - causative role for admission and hospitalization in nearly 50% of cases, whereas it was an incidental finding in just under 50%. These results confirm data from other countries and demonstrate that the role of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test for hospitalization can only be answered by a comprehensive and elaborate analysis of individual data.</p>","PeriodicalId":20197,"journal":{"name":"Pneumologie","volume":" ","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2161-5866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It is often discussed that a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients may not be causally linked to the hospital stay, but no scientific data are available from Germany. Therefore, we analyzed to what extent a positive PCR test could be assessed as causal or secondary to admission according to clinical criteria in a tertiary care hospital of the first 4 months of 2022.

Methods: SARS-CoV-2-positive patients of RoMed-Klinikum Rosenheim/Bavaria from 01/01/2022 to 30/04/2022 were included. Patients were divided into a group with COVID-19 as direct reason for admission (CAW), and a group, in which this did not apply according to a comprehensive clinical assessment (nCAW). Patients with no clear allocation to these groups were counted separately. Categorization was based on a multilevel procedure and performed by an internist experienced in COVD-19 (M.H.). It included all available clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings as well as treatment decisions.

Results: 647 cases were included (age 10 days to 101 years, median 68 years; 49.5% women), including 13 patients in two admissions with positive PCR. 45.3% (n=293) were attributable to the group with COVID as the reason for admission, 48.8% (n=316) were not, no clear decision could be made in 35 patients, 3 patients were transferred from other clinics for isolation. In infants (up to 1 year), a positive PCR test was more frequently categorized as causative than in older patients. Leading symptoms of classification were found to be fatigue/fatigue, fever/chills, and cough on admission. Febrile convulsions accounted for the reason for admission in 10 cases of children (age 1.1-7.6 years). Length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (median (quartiles) 5 (2; 10) days for CAW, 5 (2; 12) for nCAW), nor did in-hospital mortality and median age of deceased or survivors.

Discussion: A retrospective analysis of all clinical data revealed that positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR played a major and - according to clinical criteria - causative role for admission and hospitalization in nearly 50% of cases, whereas it was an incidental finding in just under 50%. These results confirm data from other countries and demonstrate that the role of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test for hospitalization can only be answered by a comprehensive and elaborate analysis of individual data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[初级保健医院不同年龄段住院患者严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型PCR阳性的回顾性临床因果评估]。
引言:人们经常讨论,住院患者的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型PCR阳性可能与住院没有因果关系,但德国没有可用的科学数据。因此,我们分析了根据2022年前4个月三级护理医院的临床标准,阳性PCR检测在多大程度上可以被评估为入院的因果关系或继发关系。方法:纳入2022年1月1日至2022年4月30日期间RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim/Bavaria的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性患者。患者被分为一组,新冠肺炎是入院的直接原因(CAW),另一组根据综合临床评估(nCAW)不适用。没有明确分配到这些组的患者被单独计数。分类基于多层次程序,由一名有新冠肺炎经验的内科医生进行。它包括所有可用的临床、放射学和实验室结果以及治疗决定。结果:包括647例病例(年龄10天至101岁,中位数68岁;49.5%为女性),其中13例患者在两次入院时PCR呈阳性。45.3%(n=293)可归因于以新冠肺炎为入院原因的组,48.8%(n=316)不可归因于新冠肺炎,35名患者无法做出明确决定,3名患者从其他诊所转入隔离。在婴儿(1岁以下)中,PCR检测呈阳性比老年患者更常被归类为病因。分类的主要症状是入院时疲劳/疲劳、发烧/发冷和咳嗽。10例儿童(年龄1.1-7.6岁)因热性惊厥入院。各组的住院时间没有显著差异(CAW的中位数(四分位数)为5(2;10)天,nCAW的中位数(2;12)天),住院死亡率和死者或幸存者的中位数年龄也没有显著差异。讨论:对所有临床数据的回顾性分析显示,根据临床标准,在近50%的病例中,严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型聚合酶链式反应阳性在入院和住院中起着主要和致病作用,而在不到50%的患者中,这是一个偶然发现。这些结果证实了其他国家的数据,并表明只有对个人数据进行全面细致的分析才能回答严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型PCR检测呈阳性对住院治疗的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumologie
Pneumologie RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
416
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie DGP Organ des Deutschen Zentralkomitees zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose DZK Organ des Bundesverbandes der Pneumologen BdP Fachärzte für Lungen- und Bronchialheilkunde, Pneumologen und Allergologen
期刊最新文献
[Cannabis and nicotine in German music videos]. [Pneumonia due to silent aspiration: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge]. [Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer]. [Recommendations for training courses in bronchoscopy - update 2024]. [The reality of bronchoscopy care in Germany: a survey by the German Respiratory Society].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1