Sixty Years of Confronting Diabetes and Kidney Disease

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151426
Friedrich C. Luft MD
{"title":"Sixty Years of Confronting Diabetes and Kidney Disease","authors":"Friedrich C. Luft MD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The good old days were not good, at least in terms of treating patients with type 2 diabetes. In the 1960s, the development of a radioimmunoassay for insulin permitted determination of the distinguishing features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The latter was treated with sulfonylureas and then phenformin, although the mechanisms of action at the time were unknown. The University Group Diabetes Program was a randomized controlled trial experienced by my medical generation, and the results were dramatic, both medically and legally. Next came the thiazolidinediones. All compounds were associated with weight gain and any end point benefits were uncertain. Nevertheless, basic science explained how glucose is sensed and even found a home for sulfonylureas in some patients. Next came the boom in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, sacred ground for many, albeit the benefits were less than astounding. Other wonder drugs came and went. Over the decades, great strides were made in defining the pathology of diabetic renal disease, which is appropriate because the condition has become a primary cause of end-stage renal failure. Nonetheless, recent advances have turned around a depressing situation and are reasons for optimism. We now have compounds that actually could help patients with type 2 diabetes. One hundred years after insulin's introduction, it is high time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0270929523001365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The good old days were not good, at least in terms of treating patients with type 2 diabetes. In the 1960s, the development of a radioimmunoassay for insulin permitted determination of the distinguishing features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The latter was treated with sulfonylureas and then phenformin, although the mechanisms of action at the time were unknown. The University Group Diabetes Program was a randomized controlled trial experienced by my medical generation, and the results were dramatic, both medically and legally. Next came the thiazolidinediones. All compounds were associated with weight gain and any end point benefits were uncertain. Nevertheless, basic science explained how glucose is sensed and even found a home for sulfonylureas in some patients. Next came the boom in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, sacred ground for many, albeit the benefits were less than astounding. Other wonder drugs came and went. Over the decades, great strides were made in defining the pathology of diabetic renal disease, which is appropriate because the condition has become a primary cause of end-stage renal failure. Nonetheless, recent advances have turned around a depressing situation and are reasons for optimism. We now have compounds that actually could help patients with type 2 diabetes. One hundred years after insulin's introduction, it is high time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对抗糖尿病和肾脏疾病60年。
过去的好日子并不好,至少在治疗2型糖尿病患者方面是这样。在20世纪60年代,胰岛素放射免疫分析法的发展允许确定1型和2型糖尿病的区别特征。后者先用磺脲类药物治疗,然后用苯乙双胍治疗,尽管当时的作用机制尚不清楚。大学糖尿病小组项目是我这一代医学界经历的一项随机对照试验,无论在医学上还是在法律上,结果都是惊人的。接下来是噻唑烷二酮。所有化合物都与体重增加有关,任何终点益处都不确定。尽管如此,基础科学解释了葡萄糖是如何被感知的,甚至为一些患者找到了磺酰脲类药物的归宿。接下来是肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统阻断的繁荣,这是许多人的圣地,尽管其益处并不惊人。其他神奇的药物来来往往。几十年来,在定义糖尿病肾病的病理学方面取得了巨大进展,这是合适的,因为糖尿病肾病已成为终末期肾功能衰竭的主要原因。尽管如此,最近的进展扭转了令人沮丧的局面,是乐观的理由。我们现在有了可以帮助2型糖尿病患者的化合物。胰岛素问世一百年后,是时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in nephrology
Seminars in nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Nephrology is a timely source for the publication of new concepts and research findings relevant to the clinical practice of nephrology. Each issue is an organized compendium of practical information that serves as a lasting reference for nephrologists, internists and physicians in training.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Advance Patient-Centered Research, Practice, and Policy in Nephrology. Patient-Reported Experience Measures to Evaluate and Improve the Quality of Care in Nephrology. Evaluating Medical Devices in Nephrology Using Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures. Navigating Choices in Nephrology: The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences in Economic Evaluations and Decisions in Health Care. Measuring Social Functioning in Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1