Infection prevention and control measures in audiology practice within public healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Pub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI:10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.636
Nasim B Khan, Chenay R Charles, Naedene Naidoo, Amanda Nokubonga, Ndabenhle A Mkhwanazi, Hella M T E Moustache
{"title":"Infection prevention and control measures in audiology practice within public healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.","authors":"Nasim B Khan,&nbsp;Chenay R Charles,&nbsp;Naedene Naidoo,&nbsp;Amanda Nokubonga,&nbsp;Ndabenhle A Mkhwanazi,&nbsp;Hella M T E Moustache","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Audiologists have a clinical and ethical responsibility to create a working environment, designed to reduce the potential for cross-contamination or transmission of infections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the infection prevention and control (IPC) measures utilised and the opinions of audiologists and speech therapists, and audiologists (A/STAs) towards IPC in public healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative, descriptive survey was utilised and entailed completing an online questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha (0.82) indicated good internal consistency of the tool. Forty-nine A/STAs from 29 public healthcare facilities responded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (82%) followed a generic Department of Health policy on IPC, while 67% alluded to a discipline-specific policy. Participants had received training in infection control but indicated that further instruction was required for audiology-specific infection control procedures. Only 57% indicated that they 'sometimes' wore gloves with every patient during direct clinical contact. An association between the healthcare facility level and the wearing of gloves was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.025). Participants at regional and tertiary levels contended that gloves should be worn during most procedures versus those at district levels of care. While 96% washed their hands after each patient, only 76% washed their hands before each patient. Twenty-nine per cent indicated that they only 'sometimes' wore masks when in contact with patients with communicable diseases. Approximately one-third disinfected touch surfaces and toys, based on the clinician's discretion. The majority (86%) of participants, however, always followed the correct protocol for medical waste disposal. Despite training and the availability of policies, some practitioners displayed poor IPC practices in terms of universal precautions, personal protective equipment, handwashing and sterilisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further education, training and awareness related to appropriate IPC measures are recommended for audiologists. It is envisaged that this will lead to more effective IPC measures in audiology practice thereby reducing the risk of infection transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"66 1","pages":"e1-e14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.636","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Audiologists have a clinical and ethical responsibility to create a working environment, designed to reduce the potential for cross-contamination or transmission of infections.

Objectives: To describe the infection prevention and control (IPC) measures utilised and the opinions of audiologists and speech therapists, and audiologists (A/STAs) towards IPC in public healthcare facilities in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.

Method: A quantitative, descriptive survey was utilised and entailed completing an online questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha (0.82) indicated good internal consistency of the tool. Forty-nine A/STAs from 29 public healthcare facilities responded.

Results: Most participants (82%) followed a generic Department of Health policy on IPC, while 67% alluded to a discipline-specific policy. Participants had received training in infection control but indicated that further instruction was required for audiology-specific infection control procedures. Only 57% indicated that they 'sometimes' wore gloves with every patient during direct clinical contact. An association between the healthcare facility level and the wearing of gloves was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.025). Participants at regional and tertiary levels contended that gloves should be worn during most procedures versus those at district levels of care. While 96% washed their hands after each patient, only 76% washed their hands before each patient. Twenty-nine per cent indicated that they only 'sometimes' wore masks when in contact with patients with communicable diseases. Approximately one-third disinfected touch surfaces and toys, based on the clinician's discretion. The majority (86%) of participants, however, always followed the correct protocol for medical waste disposal. Despite training and the availability of policies, some practitioners displayed poor IPC practices in terms of universal precautions, personal protective equipment, handwashing and sterilisation.

Conclusion: Further education, training and awareness related to appropriate IPC measures are recommended for audiologists. It is envisaged that this will lead to more effective IPC measures in audiology practice thereby reducing the risk of infection transmission.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省公共医疗机构听力学实践中的感染预防和控制措施。
背景:听力学家有临床和伦理责任创造一个工作环境,旨在减少交叉污染或感染传播的可能性。目的:描述南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省公共医疗机构中使用的感染预防和控制(IPC)措施,以及听力学家、言语治疗师和听力学家(A/STA)对IPC的意见。方法:采用定量描述性调查,完成在线问卷。Cronbachα(0.82)表明该工具具有良好的内部一致性。来自29家公共医疗机构的49名A/STA做出了回应。结果:大多数参与者(82%)遵循了卫生部关于IPC的通用政策,而67%的参与者暗示了特定学科的政策。参与者接受了感染控制方面的培训,但表示需要进一步指导听力学特定的感染控制程序。只有57%的人表示,在直接临床接触期间,他们“有时”会给每位患者戴上手套。医疗机构级别和戴手套之间的关联被发现具有统计学意义(p=0.025)。地区和三级级别的参与者认为,与地区级别的护理相比,在大多数手术中都应该戴手套。96%的患者在每位患者之后洗手,只有76%的患者在每次患者之前洗手。29%的人表示,他们只是“有时”在与传染病患者接触时戴口罩。根据临床医生的判断,大约三分之一的人对触摸表面和玩具进行了消毒。然而,大多数(86%)参与者始终遵循正确的医疗废物处理方案。尽管进行了培训并制定了政策,但一些从业者在普遍预防措施、个人防护设备、洗手和消毒方面表现出了不良的IPC做法。结论:建议听力学家进行进一步的教育、培训和提高对适当IPC措施的认识。据设想,这将导致在听力学实践中采取更有效的IPC措施,从而降低感染传播的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Community-based infant hearing screening: Outcomes of a rural pilot programme. Communication Intervention in South Africa: Advocating for the Listening and Spoken Language Approach. Brainstem auditory evoked responses: Objective hearing threshold assessment in Holstein cows. The outcomes of an audiological management programme for neonates with hyperbilirubinaemia. Awareness of middle ear pathologies in South Africa: Towards a primordial preventive audiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1