Safe and valid? A systematic review of the psychometric properties of culturally adapted depression scales for use among Indigenous populations.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-09-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2023.52
Michelle Yang, Quinta Seon, Liliana Gomez Cardona, Maharshee Karia, Gajanan Velupillai, Valérie Noel, Outi Linnaranta
{"title":"Safe and valid? A systematic review of the psychometric properties of culturally adapted depression scales for use among Indigenous populations.","authors":"Michelle Yang, Quinta Seon, Liliana Gomez Cardona, Maharshee Karia, Gajanan Velupillai, Valérie Noel, Outi Linnaranta","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2023.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing culturally sensitive psychometric measures of depression may be an effective strategy to improve acceptance, response rate, and reliability of psychological assessment among Indigenous populations. However, the psychometric properties of depression scales after cultural adaptation remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened the Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, Global Health, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases through three levels of search terms: Depression, Psychometrics, and Indigenous, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed metrics for reliability (including Cronbach's alpha), validity (including fit indices), and clinical utility (including predictive value).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 31 studies included the review, 13 different depression scales were adapted through language or content modification. Sample populations included Indigenous from the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Most cultural adaptations had strong psychometric properties; however, few and inconsistent properties were reported. Where available, alphas, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, construct validity, and incremental validity often indicated increased cultural sensitivity of adapted scales. There were mixed results for clinical utility, criterion validity, cross-cultural validity, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, predictive value, and likelihood ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modifications to increase cultural relevance have the potential to improve fit and acceptance of a scale by the Indigenous population, however, these changes may decrease specificity and negative predictive value. There is an urgent need for suitable tools that are useful and reliable for identifying Indigenous individuals for clinical treatment of depression. This awaits future work for optimal specificity and validated cut-off points that take into account the high prevalence of depression in these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"10 ","pages":"e60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.52","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementing culturally sensitive psychometric measures of depression may be an effective strategy to improve acceptance, response rate, and reliability of psychological assessment among Indigenous populations. However, the psychometric properties of depression scales after cultural adaptation remain unclear.

Methods: We screened the Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, Global Health, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases through three levels of search terms: Depression, Psychometrics, and Indigenous, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed metrics for reliability (including Cronbach's alpha), validity (including fit indices), and clinical utility (including predictive value).

Results: Across 31 studies included the review, 13 different depression scales were adapted through language or content modification. Sample populations included Indigenous from the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Most cultural adaptations had strong psychometric properties; however, few and inconsistent properties were reported. Where available, alphas, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, construct validity, and incremental validity often indicated increased cultural sensitivity of adapted scales. There were mixed results for clinical utility, criterion validity, cross-cultural validity, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, predictive value, and likelihood ratio.

Conclusions: Modifications to increase cultural relevance have the potential to improve fit and acceptance of a scale by the Indigenous population, however, these changes may decrease specificity and negative predictive value. There is an urgent need for suitable tools that are useful and reliable for identifying Indigenous individuals for clinical treatment of depression. This awaits future work for optimal specificity and validated cut-off points that take into account the high prevalence of depression in these populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全有效?一项针对土著人口使用的文化适应抑郁量表的心理测量特性的系统综述。
背景:实施对文化敏感的抑郁症心理测量措施可能是提高土著人口心理评估的接受度、反应率和可靠性的有效策略。然而,文化适应后抑郁量表的心理测量特性仍不清楚。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南,通过抑郁、心理测量和土著三个级别的搜索词筛选Ovid Medline、PubMed、Embase、Global Health、PsycInfo和CINAHL数据库。我们评估了可靠性(包括Cronbachα)、有效性(包括拟合指数)和临床实用性(包括预测值)的指标。结果:在纳入综述的31项研究中,通过语言或内容修改调整了13种不同的抑郁量表。样本人口包括来自美洲、亚洲、非洲和大洋洲的土著人。大多数文化适应具有强烈的心理测量特性;然而,报道的性质很少且不一致。在可用的情况下,字母表、评分者间和重测信度、结构有效性和增量有效性通常表明适应量表的文化敏感性增加。临床效用、标准有效性、跨文化有效性、敏感性、特异性、受试者操作特征曲线下面积、预测值和似然比的结果参差不齐。结论:增加文化相关性的修改有可能提高土著人口对量表的适应度和接受度,然而,这些变化可能会降低特异性和阴性预测值。迫切需要有用和可靠的合适工具来识别用于抑郁症临床治疗的土著人。考虑到这些人群中抑郁症的高患病率,这有待于未来的最佳特异性和验证临界点的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
期刊最新文献
Mental health plans and policies across the WHO European region. Shared experiences, shared support: A qualitative study on the importance of relatability in interpersonal relationships for youth mental health in South Africa. The Polish version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Short Form (ERQ-S): Psychometric properties, Polish norms and relationships with psychopathology and well-being. Mental health and quality of life following breast cancer diagnosis in patients seen at a tertiary care hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: A qualitative study. Mental health vulnerability in multicultural families: Risk factors among homogenous country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1