{"title":"The use of urine peptidomics to define dietary gluten peptides from patients with celiac disease and the clinical relevance.","authors":"Chiara Monachesi, Giulia Catassi, Carlo Catassi","doi":"10.1080/14789450.2023.2270775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Determination of urinary gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) has emerged as one of the most attractive test to monitor the adherence to the gluten-free diet (GFD) of patients with celiac disease (CD), being a simple, noninvasive and direct method to detect gluten contamination of the GFD.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We conducted a scoping review in Medline (PubMed) of articles published up to April 2023 that analyzed any aspect of the clinical relevance of the use of urinary GIP measurement in patients with CD. A total of 17 articles reporting the clinical use of urinary peptidomics for the follow-up of CD patients were finally included.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Available data suggest that a negative urinary GIP result is a reliable noninvasive predictor of intestinal mucosa healing in CD patients treated with the GFD, especially if testing three urine samples on different days including the weekend. Due to conflicting results about the sensitivity and the specificity of the urinary GIP determination, additional in-depth information is needed, particularly related to (1) the relationship between the amount of ingested gluten and the quantity of urinary GIP excreted in treated CD patients, (2) the GIP kinetics and best timing for sample collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50463,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Proteomics","volume":" ","pages":"281-290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2023.2270775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Determination of urinary gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) has emerged as one of the most attractive test to monitor the adherence to the gluten-free diet (GFD) of patients with celiac disease (CD), being a simple, noninvasive and direct method to detect gluten contamination of the GFD.
Areas covered: We conducted a scoping review in Medline (PubMed) of articles published up to April 2023 that analyzed any aspect of the clinical relevance of the use of urinary GIP measurement in patients with CD. A total of 17 articles reporting the clinical use of urinary peptidomics for the follow-up of CD patients were finally included.
Expert opinion: Available data suggest that a negative urinary GIP result is a reliable noninvasive predictor of intestinal mucosa healing in CD patients treated with the GFD, especially if testing three urine samples on different days including the weekend. Due to conflicting results about the sensitivity and the specificity of the urinary GIP determination, additional in-depth information is needed, particularly related to (1) the relationship between the amount of ingested gluten and the quantity of urinary GIP excreted in treated CD patients, (2) the GIP kinetics and best timing for sample collection.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Proteomics (ISSN 1478-9450) seeks to collect together technologies, methods and discoveries from the field of proteomics to advance scientific understanding of the many varied roles protein expression plays in human health and disease.
The journal coverage includes, but is not limited to, overviews of specific technological advances in the development of protein arrays, interaction maps, data archives and biological assays, performance of new technologies and prospects for future drug discovery.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies and a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale
Article highlights - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points.