Observational assessment for determining shoulder fault movements before and after corrective education in participants with chronic shoulder pain: Concurrent validity study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2023.09.008
{"title":"Observational assessment for determining shoulder fault movements before and after corrective education in participants with chronic shoulder pain: Concurrent validity study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Movement faults (MF), described as the alteration of joint position and motion, are an important factor associated with developing shoulder pathologies. However, determining or predicting the exact MF in participants with shoulder pain is limited by the absence of clinical tools and poor validity.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of the study was to determine the validity of using observational assessment to MFs or controlling MFs in subjects with chronic shoulder pain during shoulder elevation and external rotation.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Concurrent validity study</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-seven people with chronic shoulder pain were examined. The index test represented three observational assessments of MF during shoulder external rotation, elevation in the frontal plane, and elevation in the sagittal plane. Three-dimensional motion analysis represented the reference test. The movements of both shoulder joints were evaluated simultaneously, and the index and reference tests were performed concurrently.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity and specificity of observational detection were good to excellent (Se: 77.5%, Sp: 81.5%) for MF and excellent (Se: 85.7%, Sp: 100%) for controlling MF. The positive and negative predictive value was (PPV: 93.9, NPV: 57.1) for MF and (PPV: 100%, NPV: 82.8%) for controlling MF. The result of the positive and negative likelihood ratio was (PLR: 5.4, NLR: 0.26) for MF and (PLR: 0, NLR: 0.18) for controlling MF.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results revealed that the validity of the observational detection approach for identifying MFs was good to excellent. Moreover, the accuracy of this approach in detecting the control of MFs after patient education was excellent. There was good to excellent accuracy in most MFs once classified by their motion trajectories, except for scapula anterior tilt during glenohumeral joint external rotation or elevation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":"37 3","pages":"Pages 405-411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001345/pdfft?md5=80f301d29b13d0fdc9cde0f5fe715db3&pid=1-s2.0-S0894113023001345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Movement faults (MF), described as the alteration of joint position and motion, are an important factor associated with developing shoulder pathologies. However, determining or predicting the exact MF in participants with shoulder pain is limited by the absence of clinical tools and poor validity.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to determine the validity of using observational assessment to MFs or controlling MFs in subjects with chronic shoulder pain during shoulder elevation and external rotation.

Study Design

Concurrent validity study

Methods

Twenty-seven people with chronic shoulder pain were examined. The index test represented three observational assessments of MF during shoulder external rotation, elevation in the frontal plane, and elevation in the sagittal plane. Three-dimensional motion analysis represented the reference test. The movements of both shoulder joints were evaluated simultaneously, and the index and reference tests were performed concurrently.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of observational detection were good to excellent (Se: 77.5%, Sp: 81.5%) for MF and excellent (Se: 85.7%, Sp: 100%) for controlling MF. The positive and negative predictive value was (PPV: 93.9, NPV: 57.1) for MF and (PPV: 100%, NPV: 82.8%) for controlling MF. The result of the positive and negative likelihood ratio was (PLR: 5.4, NLR: 0.26) for MF and (PLR: 0, NLR: 0.18) for controlling MF.

Conclusions

The results revealed that the validity of the observational detection approach for identifying MFs was good to excellent. Moreover, the accuracy of this approach in detecting the control of MFs after patient education was excellent. There was good to excellent accuracy in most MFs once classified by their motion trajectories, except for scapula anterior tilt during glenohumeral joint external rotation or elevation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定慢性肩部疼痛参与者矫正教育前后肩部断层运动的观察性评估:并行有效性研究。
背景:运动断层(MF)被描述为关节位置和运动的改变,是与发展肩部疾病相关的一个重要因素。然而,由于缺乏临床工具和有效性差,确定或预测肩部疼痛参与者的确切MF受到限制。目的:本研究的目的是确定在肩部抬高和外旋过程中对慢性肩部疼痛受试者的MFs进行观察性评估或控制MFs的有效性。研究设计:并行有效性研究方法:对27名慢性肩痛患者进行检查。该指数测试代表了对肩部外旋、额平面抬高和矢状面抬高过程中MF的三种观察评估。三维运动分析代表了参考试验。同时评估两个肩关节的运动,同时进行指标和参考测试。结果:观察检测对MF的敏感性和特异性分别为良-优(Se:77.5%,Sp:81.5%)和优(Se:85.7%,Sp:100%),阳性和阴性预测值分别为(PPV:93.9,NPV:57.1)和(PPV:100%,NPV:828%)。MF的阳性和阴性似然比结果为(PLR:5.4,NLR:0.26),控制MF的阴性和阳性似然比结果(PLR:0,NLR:0.18)。此外,这种方法在患者教育后检测MFs控制的准确性非常好。大多数MFs一旦根据其运动轨迹进行分类,其准确性都很好,但在肩关节外旋或抬高过程中肩胛骨前倾除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The outcome difference between acute bony and tendinous mallet fingers treated conservatively in children. Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1