Induction of labor after one previous cesarean: Predictors of vaginal birth

Saniyati Badri Bashirudin, Siti Zawiah Omar, Farah Gan, Mukhri Hamdan, Peng Chiong Tan
{"title":"Induction of labor after one previous cesarean: Predictors of vaginal birth","authors":"Saniyati Badri Bashirudin,&nbsp;Siti Zawiah Omar,&nbsp;Farah Gan,&nbsp;Mukhri Hamdan,&nbsp;Peng Chiong Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify independent predictors for vaginal delivery after induction of labor after one cesarean (IOLAC).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, the electronic medical record of 19064 women who delivered from January 2018–September 2022 in a university hospital in Malaysia were individually searched to identify cases of IOLAC. Preselected data points on characteristics and the outcome of mode of delivery were retrieved. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify predictor characteristics for the dichotomous outcomes of vaginal delivery vs unplanned cesarean delivery. Variables with crude p &lt; 0.05 were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of vaginal delivery after IOLAC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>819 IOLAC cases were identified. There were 465/819 (56.5 %) unplanned cesareans deliveries. Of the 14 selected characteristics, eight had p &lt; 0.05 on bivariate analysis. After adjustment, six characteristics, body mass index, height, ethnicity, parity, previous cesarean indication and Bishop score were independently predictive of vaginal birth but not maternal age or method of labor induction. Birthweight, labor induction indication, gestational age, haemoglobin level, diabetes and hypertension in pregnancy were not significant at the level of bivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Obesity, short stature, no prior vaginal delivery, previous cesarean indicated by failure to progress, unfavorable Bishop score and ethnicity were independent predictors for unplanned cesarean after IOLAC. These predictors should help guide women and their care providers in their shared decision-making about IOLAC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/86/main.PMC10582776.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify independent predictors for vaginal delivery after induction of labor after one cesarean (IOLAC).

Study design

In this retrospective cohort study, the electronic medical record of 19064 women who delivered from January 2018–September 2022 in a university hospital in Malaysia were individually searched to identify cases of IOLAC. Preselected data points on characteristics and the outcome of mode of delivery were retrieved. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify predictor characteristics for the dichotomous outcomes of vaginal delivery vs unplanned cesarean delivery. Variables with crude p < 0.05 were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of vaginal delivery after IOLAC.

Results

819 IOLAC cases were identified. There were 465/819 (56.5 %) unplanned cesareans deliveries. Of the 14 selected characteristics, eight had p < 0.05 on bivariate analysis. After adjustment, six characteristics, body mass index, height, ethnicity, parity, previous cesarean indication and Bishop score were independently predictive of vaginal birth but not maternal age or method of labor induction. Birthweight, labor induction indication, gestational age, haemoglobin level, diabetes and hypertension in pregnancy were not significant at the level of bivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Obesity, short stature, no prior vaginal delivery, previous cesarean indicated by failure to progress, unfavorable Bishop score and ethnicity were independent predictors for unplanned cesarean after IOLAC. These predictors should help guide women and their care providers in their shared decision-making about IOLAC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一次剖宫产后的引产:阴道分娩的预测因素
目的确定剖宫产术后阴道分娩的独立预测因素。研究设计在这项回顾性队列研究中,对2018年1月至2022年9月在马来西亚一所大学医院分娩的19064名女性的电子病历进行了单独搜索,以确定IOLAC病例。检索关于分娩方式的特征和结果的预选数据点。进行双变量分析,以确定阴道分娩与计划外剖宫产的二分结果的预测特征。粗p<;0.05纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析,以确定IOLAC后阴道分娩的独立预测因素。结果共发现IOLAC 819例。计划外剖腹产465/819例(56.5%)。在所选择的14个特征中,8个具有p<;0.05。调整后,六个特征、体重指数、身高、种族、产次、既往剖宫产指征和Bishop评分独立预测阴道分娩,但不预测产妇年龄或引产方法。出生体重、引产指征、胎龄、血红蛋白水平、妊娠期糖尿病和高血压在双变量分析水平上不显著。结论肥胖、身材矮小、既往无阴道分娩、既往剖宫产失败、不良的Bishop评分和种族是IOLAC后计划外剖宫产的独立预测因素。这些预测因素应有助于指导妇女及其护理提供者共同决策IOLAC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Foeto–Maternal outcomes of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks of gestation after induced or spontaneous labour Editorial Board Epidemiology and placental pathology of intrauterine fetal demise in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines Perinatal outcomes in indian women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS): Five year experience from a tertiary care centre Postmortem fertilization: New Italian government guidelines affirm the legitimacy of this procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1