The Revised American Occupational Therapy Association Fieldwork Performance Evaluations: Evaluation of Internal Structure, Response Processes, and Precision-Part 2.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5014/ajot.2023.050207
Anders Kottorp, Catherine Killian, Kathryn Duke, Caniece Leggett, Ruxandra Drasga, Katharine Preissner
{"title":"The Revised American Occupational Therapy Association Fieldwork Performance Evaluations: Evaluation of Internal Structure, Response Processes, and Precision-Part 2.","authors":"Anders Kottorp,&nbsp;Catherine Killian,&nbsp;Kathryn Duke,&nbsp;Caniece Leggett,&nbsp;Ruxandra Drasga,&nbsp;Katharine Preissner","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2023.050207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is an evidence-based need to assess the validity and reliability/precision of the revised American Occupational Therapy Association's Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) items for the occupational therapy student (OTS) and the occupational therapy assistant student (OTAS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate evidence of validity in relation to response processes, internal structure, and precision of the FWPEs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>OTS and OTAS fieldwork practice settings, United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred sixty-seven fieldwork educators participated in total, providing 228 OTS evaluations and 39 OTAS evaluations.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>A Rasch model was used to evaluate aspects of validity and precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rating scales provided evidence of the tools' overall validity. Thirty-two of 37 items on the FWPE for the OTS, and 27 of 31 items on the FWPE for the OTAS demonstrated acceptable fit, but the evidence of unidimensionality in the subscales and in the total scales was not fully supported. The total/reduced FWPE scales were able to separate students into at least four distinct groups of fieldwork performance. The relationships between the current and revised FWPEs indicate that the new scales measure different but related constructs of student fieldwork performance, compared with the current version.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings support that the revised FWPEs for the OTS and OTAS demonstrate preliminary evidence of internal structure, response processes, and precision, supporting evidence-based practice in fieldwork evaluations. What This Article Adds: This article highlights evidence demonstrating the validity and precision of the revised American Occupational Therapy Association's Fieldwork Performance Evaluation items and supports academic and fieldwork settings for occupational therapy students and occupational therapy assistant students.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There is an evidence-based need to assess the validity and reliability/precision of the revised American Occupational Therapy Association's Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) items for the occupational therapy student (OTS) and the occupational therapy assistant student (OTAS).

Objective: To evaluate evidence of validity in relation to response processes, internal structure, and precision of the FWPEs.

Design: Cross-sectional study design.

Setting: OTS and OTAS fieldwork practice settings, United States.

Participants: Two hundred sixty-seven fieldwork educators participated in total, providing 228 OTS evaluations and 39 OTAS evaluations.

Outcomes and measures: A Rasch model was used to evaluate aspects of validity and precision.

Results: The rating scales provided evidence of the tools' overall validity. Thirty-two of 37 items on the FWPE for the OTS, and 27 of 31 items on the FWPE for the OTAS demonstrated acceptable fit, but the evidence of unidimensionality in the subscales and in the total scales was not fully supported. The total/reduced FWPE scales were able to separate students into at least four distinct groups of fieldwork performance. The relationships between the current and revised FWPEs indicate that the new scales measure different but related constructs of student fieldwork performance, compared with the current version.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings support that the revised FWPEs for the OTS and OTAS demonstrate preliminary evidence of internal structure, response processes, and precision, supporting evidence-based practice in fieldwork evaluations. What This Article Adds: This article highlights evidence demonstrating the validity and precision of the revised American Occupational Therapy Association's Fieldwork Performance Evaluation items and supports academic and fieldwork settings for occupational therapy students and occupational therapy assistant students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订后的美国职业治疗协会实地工作绩效评估:内部结构、反应过程和精度评估第2部分。
重要性:有循证需要评估修订后的美国职业治疗协会针对职业治疗学生(OTS)和职业治疗助理学生(OTAS)的实地工作绩效评估(FWPE)项目的有效性和可靠性/准确性,设计:横断面研究设计。设置:OTS和OTAS实地考察实践设置,美国。参与者:总共有167名实地考察教育工作者参与,提供了228项OTS评估和39项OTAS评估。结果和测量:使用Rasch模型评估有效性和准确性。结果:评定量表提供了工具总体有效性的证据。OTS的FWPE 37个项目中有32个,OTAS的FWPE 31个项目中的27个显示出可接受的拟合,但分量表和总量表中的单维度证据并不完全支持。总的/减少的FWPE量表能够将学生分为至少四组不同的实地考察表现。当前和修订后的FWPE之间的关系表明,与当前版本相比,新的量表衡量的是不同但相关的学生实地考察表现结构。结论和相关性:研究结果支持OTS和OTAS的修订FWPE展示了内部结构、响应过程和准确性的初步证据,支持实地评估中的循证实践。本文补充:本文强调了证明修订后的美国职业治疗协会实地工作绩效评估项目有效性和准确性的证据,并支持职业治疗学生和职业治疗助理学生的学术和实地工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
期刊最新文献
Educating the Educator: Applying a Growth Mindset Approach to Prepare Educators for Major Changes in Occupational Therapy Education. Predictive Factors of State Licensure Board Disciplinary Actions in Occupational Therapy. The Hand Accumulation aNd Dexterity FUnctional Limits-Shriners (HANDFULS): A New Clinically Feasible Measure of Hand Volume and In-Hand Manipulation for Children. Bimanual Arm Trainer Versus Traditional Occupational Therapy Services in Upper Extremity Function. Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1