Correlation between electrodiagnostic severity and Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire in surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome patients.

Jung Hoi Koo, Joo-Yul Bae, Kiwon Lee, Ha Sung Park
{"title":"Correlation between electrodiagnostic severity and Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire in surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome patients.","authors":"Jung Hoi Koo, Joo-Yul Bae, Kiwon Lee, Ha Sung Park","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2023.22057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate whether electrodiagnostic (EDX) findings reflect the preoperative symptom severity and functional impairment in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and (2) evaluate the relationship between EDX findings and the clinical outcomes reported according to the self-administered patient questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with idiopathic CTS who underwent carpal tunnel release between May 2016 and July 2018 were included. Carpal tunnel syndrome was clinically diagnosed and confirmed based on the EDX findings. The association between EDX findings, such as motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory latency, sensory amplitude, and severity (mild, moderate, and severe), and the Boston symptom and function scores were analyzed. The change in the Boston symptom and function scores from the preoperative baseline values (visit 1) to those recorded 1 year postoperatively (visit 5) was assessed. The effect of disease severity based on the EDX findings on the change in Boston symptom and function scores by visit was also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EDX severity, motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory latency, and sensory amplitude were not correlated with the Boston symptom and function scores preoperatively and postoperatively. Electrodiagnostic severity did not affect the improvement in the Boston symptom and function scores recorded at each visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no association between the EDX severity and perioperative Boston questionnaire scores, and the degree of improvement in patient symptoms and function did not differ according to the CTS severity based on the EDX findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, Prognostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10837589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.22057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate whether electrodiagnostic (EDX) findings reflect the preoperative symptom severity and functional impairment in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and (2) evaluate the relationship between EDX findings and the clinical outcomes reported according to the self-administered patient questionnaires.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with idiopathic CTS who underwent carpal tunnel release between May 2016 and July 2018 were included. Carpal tunnel syndrome was clinically diagnosed and confirmed based on the EDX findings. The association between EDX findings, such as motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory latency, sensory amplitude, and severity (mild, moderate, and severe), and the Boston symptom and function scores were analyzed. The change in the Boston symptom and function scores from the preoperative baseline values (visit 1) to those recorded 1 year postoperatively (visit 5) was assessed. The effect of disease severity based on the EDX findings on the change in Boston symptom and function scores by visit was also investigated.

Results: The EDX severity, motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory latency, and sensory amplitude were not correlated with the Boston symptom and function scores preoperatively and postoperatively. Electrodiagnostic severity did not affect the improvement in the Boston symptom and function scores recorded at each visit.

Conclusion: We found no association between the EDX severity and perioperative Boston questionnaire scores, and the degree of improvement in patient symptoms and function did not differ according to the CTS severity based on the EDX findings.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Prognostic study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腕管综合征患者的电诊断严重程度与Boston腕管问卷的相关性。
目的:本研究的目的是:(1)调查电诊断(EDX)结果是否反映腕管综合征(CTS)患者的术前症状严重程度和功能损害;(2)评估EDX结果与根据自行管理的患者问卷报告的临床结果之间的关系。方法:纳入2016年5月至2018年7月期间接受腕管松解术的诊断为特发性CTS的患者。腕管综合征是根据EDX检查结果进行临床诊断和确认的。分析EDX检查结果(如运动潜伏期、运动幅度、感觉潜伏期、感觉幅度和严重程度(轻度、中度和重度))与波士顿症状和功能评分之间的关系。评估波士顿症状和功能评分从术前基线值(访视1)到术后1年记录值(访问5)的变化。还调查了基于EDX结果的疾病严重程度对访视波士顿症状和功能评分变化的影响。结果:EDX严重程度、运动潜伏期、运动幅度、感觉潜伏期和感觉幅度与术前和术后Boston症状和功能评分无关。电诊断的严重程度不影响每次就诊时记录的Boston症状和功能评分的改善。结论:我们发现EDX严重程度与围手术期波士顿问卷评分之间没有关联,根据EDX结果,患者症状和功能的改善程度根据CTS严重程度没有差异。证据级别:IV级,预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical outcomes of cable plate fixation in treatment of Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective case series. A comprehensive review of scapulothoracic abnormal motion (STAM): evaluation, classification, and treatment strategies. Review of the treatment options and results of earthquake-related pelvic injuries after the Türkiye earthquake on 6th February. Treatment outcomes of concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures using Gamma3 nails with U-blade lag screws. Clinical effect of posterior-only approach debridement, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation for upper thoracic tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1