Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection for the treatment of stent underexpansion.

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.5603/cj.96438
Mohsen Mohandes, Alberto Pernigotti, Cristina Moreno, Luis Mauricio Torres, Francisco Fernández, Diego Zambrano, Alfredo Bardají
{"title":"Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection for the treatment of stent underexpansion.","authors":"Mohsen Mohandes, Alberto Pernigotti, Cristina Moreno, Luis Mauricio Torres, Francisco Fernández, Diego Zambrano, Alfredo Bardají","doi":"10.5603/cj.96438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stent underexpansion is a challenge in interventional cardiology. Some off-label treatments, such as rotational atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and coronary lasing, have been used to overcome the problem. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection and subsequent balloon dilation to optimize stent expansion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection was used. After lasing, non-compliant balloon dilation at high pressure was performed to overcome the underexpanded point. The average increase in the minimum stent area (MSA) was measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and any complication related to the technique was evaluated. Additionally, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of death from any cause, new myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), were scrutinized in a long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen underexpanded stents were treated with laser between August 2017 and November 2022. In all cases but one, IVUS was used to evaluate the MSA before and after lasing. The MSA showed an average increase of 2.34 ± 1.57 mm² (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-3.21; p < 0.001) after laser application and balloon inflation. No complication related to the technique was detected. During a follow-up period of a median (interquartile range) of 457 (50-973) days, the combined MACE assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimator showed an event-free rate of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection is a safe method to optimize a stent underexpansion, with an acceptable event-free rate in long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.96438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stent underexpansion is a challenge in interventional cardiology. Some off-label treatments, such as rotational atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and coronary lasing, have been used to overcome the problem. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection and subsequent balloon dilation to optimize stent expansion.

Methods: Coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection was used. After lasing, non-compliant balloon dilation at high pressure was performed to overcome the underexpanded point. The average increase in the minimum stent area (MSA) was measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and any complication related to the technique was evaluated. Additionally, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of death from any cause, new myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), were scrutinized in a long-term follow-up.

Results: Sixteen underexpanded stents were treated with laser between August 2017 and November 2022. In all cases but one, IVUS was used to evaluate the MSA before and after lasing. The MSA showed an average increase of 2.34 ± 1.57 mm² (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-3.21; p < 0.001) after laser application and balloon inflation. No complication related to the technique was detected. During a follow-up period of a median (interquartile range) of 457 (50-973) days, the combined MACE assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimator showed an event-free rate of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-1).

Conclusions: Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection is a safe method to optimize a stent underexpansion, with an acceptable event-free rate in long-term follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉激光同时注射造影剂治疗支架扩张不足。
背景:支架扩张不足是介入心脏病学中的一个挑战。一些标签外的治疗方法,如旋磨术、血管内碎石(IVL)和冠状动脉激光治疗,已经被用来克服这个问题。本研究的目的是评估同时注射造影剂和随后球囊扩张以优化支架扩张的冠状动脉激光斑块切除术的安全性和有效性。方法:采用激光冠状动脉斑块切除术同时注射造影剂。激光发射后,在高压下进行不顺应性球囊扩张以克服膨胀不足点。通过血管内超声(IVUS)测量最小支架面积(MSA)的平均增加,并评估与该技术相关的任何并发症。此外,在长期随访中,对包括任何原因死亡、新发心肌梗死(MI)和靶病变血运重建(TLR)在内的主要心血管不良事件(MACE)进行了仔细检查。结果:2017年8月至2022年11月,16个未充分扩张的支架接受了激光治疗。在除一例外的所有病例中,IVUS用于评估激光发射前后的MSA。激光照射和球囊扩张后,MSA平均增加2.34±1.57 mm²(95%置信区间[CI]:1.47-3.21;p<0.001)。未发现与该技术相关的并发症。在中位数(四分位间距)为457(50-973)天的随访期内,Kaplan-Meier估计器评估的综合MACE显示无事件发生率为0.82(95%CI:0.59-1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A real-life clinical application of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocarditis - one-center observational retrospective study. Cardiovascular sequelae in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection survivors. Pregabalin and gabapentin-induced heart failure. A comparison of the management and five-year outcomes of patients treated for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 - insights from the PRESAGE registry. Effect of alcohol abuse on selected markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and endothelial function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1