The Landscape of Randomized Clinical Trial Meta-analyses on Statins for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review.

Panagiotis Skouras, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Mariam Markouli, Angelos Karagiannis, Lampis C Stavrinou
{"title":"The Landscape of Randomized Clinical Trial Meta-analyses on Statins for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Panagiotis Skouras, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Mariam Markouli, Angelos Karagiannis, Lampis C Stavrinou","doi":"10.2174/0118715273270503230928100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a type of non-traumatic SAH that can have detrimental effects on the central nervous system, resulting in severe disability or death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Early nimodipine is currently the only strongly recommended pharmacological treatment that has shown efficacy in improving neurological/functional outcomes in aSAH patients. Whether statin treatment is of benefit to aSAH patients is an issue that has generated considerable interest and debate. In the present scoping review, we mapped and analyzed the available literature on metaanalyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effect of statins on aSAH. Seventeen meta-analyses of RCTs, published between 2008 and 2023, were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatments in included meta-analyses were based on various regimens of simvastatin, pravastatin, pitavastatin or atorvastatin for up to 21 days. Eleven of the included reports indicated some beneficial effect of statin treatment, reducing rates of at least one of the following: cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia/delayed ischemic neurologic deficit, mortality or functional/ neurological outcome. In contrast, six meta-analyses, showed no such effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The limitations reported by several meta-analyses, included low patient numbers or disproportionate representation of patients from certain RCTs, differences in drug treatment, patient diagnostic criteria and outcome evaluation between RCTs, as well as poor data quality or lack of RCTs data. Knowledge of the reported limitations may aid the design of future clinical trials and/or their meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":93947,"journal":{"name":"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":"1320-1327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715273270503230928100141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a type of non-traumatic SAH that can have detrimental effects on the central nervous system, resulting in severe disability or death.

Methods: Early nimodipine is currently the only strongly recommended pharmacological treatment that has shown efficacy in improving neurological/functional outcomes in aSAH patients. Whether statin treatment is of benefit to aSAH patients is an issue that has generated considerable interest and debate. In the present scoping review, we mapped and analyzed the available literature on metaanalyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effect of statins on aSAH. Seventeen meta-analyses of RCTs, published between 2008 and 2023, were identified.

Results: Treatments in included meta-analyses were based on various regimens of simvastatin, pravastatin, pitavastatin or atorvastatin for up to 21 days. Eleven of the included reports indicated some beneficial effect of statin treatment, reducing rates of at least one of the following: cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia/delayed ischemic neurologic deficit, mortality or functional/ neurological outcome. In contrast, six meta-analyses, showed no such effects.

Conclusion: The limitations reported by several meta-analyses, included low patient numbers or disproportionate representation of patients from certain RCTs, differences in drug treatment, patient diagnostic criteria and outcome evaluation between RCTs, as well as poor data quality or lack of RCTs data. Knowledge of the reported limitations may aid the design of future clinical trials and/or their meta-analyses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他汀类药物治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的随机临床试验荟萃分析:范围界定综述。
引言:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)是一种非创伤性SAH,可对中枢神经系统产生有害影响,导致严重残疾或死亡。方法:早期尼莫地平是目前唯一被强烈推荐的药物治疗方法,在改善aSAH患者的神经/功能结果方面显示出疗效。他汀类药物治疗是否对aSAH患者有益是一个引起人们极大兴趣和争论的问题。在本范围界定综述中,我们绘制并分析了有关随机临床试验(RCT)荟萃分析的可用文献,这些试验旨在检查他汀类药物对aSAH的影响。确定了2008年至2023年间发表的17项随机对照试验荟萃分析。结果:纳入荟萃分析中的治疗是基于辛伐他汀、普伐他汀、匹伐他汀或阿托伐他汀的不同方案,持续21天。纳入的11份报告表明他汀类药物治疗具有一些有益效果,可降低以下至少一种疾病的发生率:脑血管痉挛、延迟性脑缺血/延迟性缺血性神经功能缺损、死亡率或功能/神经结果。相比之下,六项荟萃分析没有显示出这样的影响。结论:几项荟萃分析报告的局限性包括某些随机对照试验的患者数量低或患者比例过高,药物治疗、患者诊断标准和随机对照试验之间的结果评估存在差异,以及数据质量差或缺乏随机对照试验数据。了解报告的局限性可能有助于设计未来的临床试验和/或其荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parkinson's Disease: Unravelling the Medicinal Perspectives and Recent Developments of Heterocyclic Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors. Enhanced Neuroprotection in Experiment Multiple Sclerosis through Combined Rosiglitazone and Probiotic-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: Modulation of Cellular Signaling Pathways. Parkinson's Disease: A Progressive Neurodegenerative Disorder and Structure-Activity Relationship of MAO Inhibitor Scaffolds as an Important Therapeutic Regimen. Exploring Therapeutic Strategies: The Relationship between Metabolic Disorders and FOXO Signalling in Alzheimer's Disease. Proposed Hypothesis of TWEAK/Fn14 Receptor Modulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1