Role of autoantibodies targeting interferon type 1 in COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.7 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Translational Autoimmunity Pub Date : 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jtauto.2023.100219
Abolfazl Akbari , Alireza Hadizadeh , Mahdi Amiri , Neshat Najaf Najafi , Zahra Shahriari , Tannaz Jamialahmadi , Amirhossein Sahebkar
{"title":"Role of autoantibodies targeting interferon type 1 in COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Abolfazl Akbari ,&nbsp;Alireza Hadizadeh ,&nbsp;Mahdi Amiri ,&nbsp;Neshat Najaf Najafi ,&nbsp;Zahra Shahriari ,&nbsp;Tannaz Jamialahmadi ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.1016/j.jtauto.2023.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Impairment of the type I interferon (IFN–I) signaling pathway is associated with increased severity of COVID-19 disease. Here we have undertaken a systematic review and meta = analysis on the association between the severity of COVID-19 and IFN-1 autoantibodies (AAbs; aIFN-1, aIFN-α, aIFN-ω, and aIFN-β).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases, including Medline [PubMed], Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, were systematically searched to find papers on the role of aIFN-1 and its subtype AAbs in the severity of COVID-19 infection. Data on the prevalence of aIFN-1, aIFN-α, aIFN-ω, and aIFN-β were pooled using random- or fixed-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on disease severity. Odds ratios (OR) for COVID-19 disease outcome, including length of hospital stay, ICU admission and death, were calculated in relation to positive or negative plasma IFN-1 AAbs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 33 studies with 13023 patients were included. The overall prevalence of circulating aIFN-1, aIFN-α, and aIFN-ω AAbs was 17.8 % [13.8, 22.8], 7.2 % [4.7, 10.9], and 4.4 % [2.1, 8.6], respectively, and the overall prevalence of neutralizing aIFN-1, aIFN-α, aIFN-ω, and aIFN-β AAbs was 7.1 % [4.9, 10.1], 7.5 % [5.9, 9.5], 8.0 % [5.7, 11.1] and 1.2 % [0.4, 3.5], respectively. Circulating aIFN-α (OR = 4.537 [2.247, 9.158]), neutralizing aIFN-α (O = 17.482 [8.899, 34.342]), and neutralizing aIFN-ω (OR = 12.529 [7.397, 21.222]) were significantly more frequent in critical/severe patients than in moderate/mild patients (p &lt; 0.001 for all). Anti–IFN–1 was more common in male subjects (OR = 2.248 [1.366, 3.699], p = 0.001) and two COVID-19 outcomes including ICU admission (OR = 2.485 [1.409, 4.385], p = 0.002) and death (OR = 2.593 [1.199, 5.604], p = 0.015) occurred more frequently in patients with positive anti–IFN–1.</p><p>Conclusion: aIFN-1 and its subtypes AAbs are associated with severe and critical COVID-19 disease and may be a predictive marker for a poor prognosis, particularly in men.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Autoimmunity","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909023000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Impairment of the type I interferon (IFN–I) signaling pathway is associated with increased severity of COVID-19 disease. Here we have undertaken a systematic review and meta = analysis on the association between the severity of COVID-19 and IFN-1 autoantibodies (AAbs; aIFN-1, aIFN-α, aIFN-ω, and aIFN-β).

Methods

Four databases, including Medline [PubMed], Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, were systematically searched to find papers on the role of aIFN-1 and its subtype AAbs in the severity of COVID-19 infection. Data on the prevalence of aIFN-1, aIFN-α, aIFN-ω, and aIFN-β were pooled using random- or fixed-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on disease severity. Odds ratios (OR) for COVID-19 disease outcome, including length of hospital stay, ICU admission and death, were calculated in relation to positive or negative plasma IFN-1 AAbs.

Results

A total of 33 studies with 13023 patients were included. The overall prevalence of circulating aIFN-1, aIFN-α, and aIFN-ω AAbs was 17.8 % [13.8, 22.8], 7.2 % [4.7, 10.9], and 4.4 % [2.1, 8.6], respectively, and the overall prevalence of neutralizing aIFN-1, aIFN-α, aIFN-ω, and aIFN-β AAbs was 7.1 % [4.9, 10.1], 7.5 % [5.9, 9.5], 8.0 % [5.7, 11.1] and 1.2 % [0.4, 3.5], respectively. Circulating aIFN-α (OR = 4.537 [2.247, 9.158]), neutralizing aIFN-α (O = 17.482 [8.899, 34.342]), and neutralizing aIFN-ω (OR = 12.529 [7.397, 21.222]) were significantly more frequent in critical/severe patients than in moderate/mild patients (p < 0.001 for all). Anti–IFN–1 was more common in male subjects (OR = 2.248 [1.366, 3.699], p = 0.001) and two COVID-19 outcomes including ICU admission (OR = 2.485 [1.409, 4.385], p = 0.002) and death (OR = 2.593 [1.199, 5.604], p = 0.015) occurred more frequently in patients with positive anti–IFN–1.

Conclusion: aIFN-1 and its subtypes AAbs are associated with severe and critical COVID-19 disease and may be a predictive marker for a poor prognosis, particularly in men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
靶向干扰素1型自身抗体在新冠肺炎严重程度中的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介:I型干扰素(IFN-I)信号通路的损伤与新冠肺炎疾病的严重程度增加有关。在此,我们对新冠肺炎严重程度与IFN-1自身抗体(AAbs;aIFN-1、aIFN-α、aIFA-ω和aIFN-β)之间的关系进行了系统回顾和meta分析。方法:四个数据库,包括Medline[PubMed]、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus,系统检索了关于aIFN-1及其亚型AAbs在新冠肺炎感染严重程度中的作用的论文。关于aIFN-1、aIFN-α、aIFN-ω和aIFN-β患病率的数据使用随机或固定效应模型进行汇总。根据疾病严重程度进行亚组分析。计算新冠肺炎疾病结果的比值比(OR),包括住院时间、入住ICU和死亡,与血浆IFN-1 AAbs阳性或阴性相关。结果:共纳入33项研究,涉及13023名患者。循环aIFN-1、aIFN-α和aIFN-ωAAbs的总患病率分别为17.8%[13.8,22.8]、7.2%[4.7,109]和4.4%[2.1,8.6],中和性aIFN-1、aIFN-α、aIFM-ω和aIFN-βAAbs的总体患病率分别是7.1%[4.9,110.1]、7.5%[5.9,9.5]、8.0%[5.7,111]和1.2%[0.4,3.5]。循环aIFN-α(OR=4.537[2.247,9.158])、中和aIFN-β(O=17.482[8.899,34.342])和中和aIFNω(OR=12.529[7.397,22.222])在危重/重症患者中的发生率明显高于中轻度患者(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
Journal of Translational Autoimmunity Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
33
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic value of β1 adrenergic receptor autoantibodies for microvascular obstruction in patients with STEMI with Post-PCI: A prospective cohort study Autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular risk: Mendelian randomization analysis for the impact of 19 autoimmune diseases on 14 cardiovascular conditions The interplay between epidermal barrier distribution, microbiota composition, and immune infiltrate defines and stratifies psoriasis patients and is associated with disease severity Homeostatic signals, including IL-7 and self-MHC recognition, induce the development of peripheral helper T cells, which are enriched in the joints of rheumatoid arthritis C3 glomerulopathy is highly prevalent in French Polynesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1