Two novel stereotactic radiotherapy methods for locally advanced, previously irradiated head and neck cancers patients

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2023.09.003
Damodar Pokhrel PhD, Josh Misa BS, Shane McCarthy MS, Eddy S. Yang MD, PhD
{"title":"Two novel stereotactic radiotherapy methods for locally advanced, previously irradiated head and neck cancers patients","authors":"Damodar Pokhrel PhD,&nbsp;Josh Misa BS,&nbsp;Shane McCarthy MS,&nbsp;Eddy S. Yang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>To determine the feasibility and utility of conebeam CT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy<span><span> for locally recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer<span> (HNC) patients on the Halcyon, a ring delivery system (RDS). This research aims to quantify plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and overall efficacy by comparing against novel clinical </span></span>TrueBeam<span><span> HyperArc method. Ten recurrent HNC patients who were treated at our institution on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) for 30 to 40 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions with noncoplanar HyperArc plans were re-planned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF). These plans were re-planned with the same Acuros-based dose engine. Additionally, we used site-specific full/partial coplanar VMAT arcs. PTV coverage, mean dose to </span>GTV<span>, maximum dose to organs-at-risk (OAR), beam-on time (BOT), and quality assurance (QA) results were investigated and compared. Halcyon provided highly conformal HNC SRT plans with slightly superior mean PTVD99 coverage (96.7% </span></span></span></span><em>vs</em> 95.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.071), and slightly lower mean GTV dose (37.8 Gy <em>vs</em> 38.2 Gy, <em>p</em> = 0.241) when compared to the HyperArc plans. Differences in plan conformality and maximum dose to OARs were statistically insignificant. Due to Halcyon's coplanar geometry, D2cm was significantly higher (<em>p</em> = 0.001) but Halcyon did result in a reduced normal brain dose by 1 Gy on average and up to 5.2 Gy in some cases. Halcyon provided similar patient-specific QA pass rates with a 2%/2mm gamma criteria (98.2% <em>vs</em> 98.5%) and independent in-house Monte Carlo second check results (97.7% <em>vs</em> 98.2%), suggesting identical treatment delivery accuracy. Halcyon plans resulted in slightly longer beam-on time (3.16 vs 2.30 minutes, <em>p</em> = 0.010), however door-to-door patient time is expected to be &lt;10 minutes. Compared to clinical TrueBeam HyperArc, Halcyon SRT plans provided similar plan quality and treatment delivery accuracy with a potentially faster overall treatment using fully automated patient setup and verification. Rapid delivery of recurrent HNC SRT may reduce intrafraction motion errors while also improving patient compliance and comfort. To provide high-quality of HNC SRT similar to HyperArc, we recommend Halcyon users consider commissioning this novel method. This method will be useful for remote and underserved patient cohorts including Halcyon-only clinics as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"49 2","pages":"Pages 114-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723000791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the feasibility and utility of conebeam CT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC) patients on the Halcyon, a ring delivery system (RDS). This research aims to quantify plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and overall efficacy by comparing against novel clinical TrueBeam HyperArc method. Ten recurrent HNC patients who were treated at our institution on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) for 30 to 40 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions with noncoplanar HyperArc plans were re-planned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF). These plans were re-planned with the same Acuros-based dose engine. Additionally, we used site-specific full/partial coplanar VMAT arcs. PTV coverage, mean dose to GTV, maximum dose to organs-at-risk (OAR), beam-on time (BOT), and quality assurance (QA) results were investigated and compared. Halcyon provided highly conformal HNC SRT plans with slightly superior mean PTVD99 coverage (96.7% vs 95.5%, p = 0.071), and slightly lower mean GTV dose (37.8 Gy vs 38.2 Gy, p = 0.241) when compared to the HyperArc plans. Differences in plan conformality and maximum dose to OARs were statistically insignificant. Due to Halcyon's coplanar geometry, D2cm was significantly higher (p = 0.001) but Halcyon did result in a reduced normal brain dose by 1 Gy on average and up to 5.2 Gy in some cases. Halcyon provided similar patient-specific QA pass rates with a 2%/2mm gamma criteria (98.2% vs 98.5%) and independent in-house Monte Carlo second check results (97.7% vs 98.2%), suggesting identical treatment delivery accuracy. Halcyon plans resulted in slightly longer beam-on time (3.16 vs 2.30 minutes, p = 0.010), however door-to-door patient time is expected to be <10 minutes. Compared to clinical TrueBeam HyperArc, Halcyon SRT plans provided similar plan quality and treatment delivery accuracy with a potentially faster overall treatment using fully automated patient setup and verification. Rapid delivery of recurrent HNC SRT may reduce intrafraction motion errors while also improving patient compliance and comfort. To provide high-quality of HNC SRT similar to HyperArc, we recommend Halcyon users consider commissioning this novel method. This method will be useful for remote and underserved patient cohorts including Halcyon-only clinics as well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种新的立体定向放射治疗方法,用于局部晚期、既往放疗过的头颈癌患者。
确定锥形束CT引导立体定向放射治疗在Halcyon环形输送系统(RDS)上局部复发、既往照射的癌症(HNC)患者的可行性和实用性。本研究旨在通过与新型临床TrueBeam HyperArc方法进行比较,量化计划质量、治疗交付准确性和总体疗效。10名复发性HNC患者在我们的机构接受TrueBeam(6MV-FFF)治疗,分3至5个部分进行3至40 Gy的非平面HyperArc计划,并在Halcyon(6MV-FF)上重新计划。这些计划是用同样的基于Acuros的剂量引擎重新规划的。此外,我们使用了特定地点的全/部分共面VMAT弧。研究并比较了PTV覆盖率、GTV平均剂量、危险器官最大剂量(OAR)、光束准时性(BOT)和质量保证(QA)结果。Halcyon提供了高度共形的HNC SRT计划,平均PTVD99覆盖率略高(96.7%对95.5%,p = 0.071),平均GTV剂量略低(37.8Gy vs 38.2Gy,p = 0.241)。计划一致性和OARs最大剂量的差异在统计学上不显著。由于Halcyon的共面几何形状,D2cm明显更高(p = 0.001),但Halcyon确实导致正常脑剂量平均减少1Gy,在某些情况下高达5.2Gy。Halcyon提供了类似的患者特异性QA通过率,具有2%/2mm伽马标准(98.2%对98.5%)和独立的内部蒙特卡罗第二次检查结果(97.7%对98.2%),表明治疗提供的准确性相同。Halcyon的计划导致波束接通时间略长(3.16比2.30分钟,p = 0.010),但预计挨家挨户的患者时间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Assessing proton plans with 3 different beam lines vs photon plans for early-stage lung cancer. Assessment of automated non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery planning in single isocenteric linac-based treatment for brain metastases with respect to planner's experience. Influence of aperture shape controller settings on dose distribution and treatment efficiency in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with a 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. Efficacy of hydrogel spacer compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. New Members List & Corporate Members List, Spring 2025
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1